152

Julia Curlee briefed presidents and became the White House’s senior career intelligence official. Then a far-right campaign targeted her for being transgender.

Julia Curlee spent nearly two decades carrying the country’s secrets.

She worked in war zones, traveled to 35 countries, briefed presidents, and boarded Air Force One with the President’s Daily Brief. She was trusted to decide what some of the world's most powerful people needed to know before beginning their days.

But in a remarkable first-person account published Monday by The Atlantic, Curlee describes how the second Trump administration came to view something else as dangerously sensitive: the fact that one of its most experienced intelligence officials was a transgender woman.

Her identity was never a secret inside the government. Trump officials had known about it during his first term, when Curlee briefed senior White House officials and became Vice President Mike Pence’s daily intelligence briefer. It became intolerable, she writes, only when the public might learn about it.

“The White House had needed me,” Curlee writes. “Trump officials had known I was trans from day one.”

Curlee joined the CIA in 2007 and became the first officer at the agency to transition openly and continue serving. She had dreamed of becoming an intelligence officer since childhood. Her other lifelong conviction — that she should have been born a woman — seemed, for years, incompatible with that calling.

She transitioned in 2013. Her first day at work as Julia passed without incident. Four years later, she wrote about the experience in The Atlantic under the pseudonym Jenny Hall, explaining how living openly had made her a more effective intelligence officer. The CIA later used the essay in college recruiting, according to Curlee.

Then came an assignment to prepare and deliver the President’s Daily Brief during Trump’s first administration. The work required arriving around midnight, studying intelligence through the early morning, and entering the West Wing before dawn.

Curlee eventually became Pence’s briefer. It was an unlikely pairing. Pence had spent years opposing marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. Curlee was a gay transgender woman, a wife, and a mother.

Yet Pence, she says, treated her as a trusted professional. He took notes, asked questions, and invited Curlee’s family to the White House when her assignment ended. There, he took her mother’s hand and said, “You must be very proud of your daughter.”

For Curlee, the moment proved that public service could rise above politics. She could serve an administration whose policies she opposed, and its leaders could recognize her expertise and humanity.

That belief brought her back to the White House under President Joe Biden, where she served as a National Security Council director. It also persuaded her to remain when Trump returned to office in January 2025.

As Biden’s political appointees departed, Curlee became the senior career intelligence official in the White House. She helped prepare the incoming administration to assume power, even as colleagues warned that she could become a target.

On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

She stayed.

Three days into the administration, roughly 160 National Security Council employees detailed from other agencies were abruptly ordered to leave the White House. Curlee was spared. She assembled what remained of her team and continued briefing officials.

The arrangement lasted 69 days.

Curlee was visiting family in Roanoke, Virginia, when she received a Saturday phone call telling her that her White House assignment had ended. She said that officials did not explain. In the same conversation, they asked her to return Monday because they still needed her work.

After hanging up, Curlee saw that far-right provocateur Laura Loomer had posted about a transgender person “Biden holdover” inside the White House, accused the unnamed official of hating Trump, and asked her followers to help identify the person.

Curlee returned to work anyway. She spent three more days completing a budget project and transferring the portfolio she had managed for nearly two years.

“We need you. We need your service. But we don’t want anyone to know you are here,” she writes of the message she received.

Curlee does not claim to have proof that Trump or Loomer personally ordered her removal because she is transgender. She was never given a reason. But her account leaves little ambiguity about the sequence: Her identity had been known and accepted while her work remained useful and private. Once it threatened to become public, her service no longer protected her.

Days later, Trump fired several other National Security Council officials after meeting with Loomer, who had urged him to purge officials she considered insufficiently loyal.

Curlee returned to the CIA. There, she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

In an accompanying Radio Atlantic interview, Curlee delivered a painful reversal of the message she once offered LGBTQ+ young people.

“Now I could not in good conscience advise any LGBT American to apply to work at CIA,” she said.

🗃️

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

Eh, she had been doing that job for decades, and didn't agree with Trump politically. Someone else voted for the leopards who ate her face.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 17 points 1 month ago

Hey, what job was that again?

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Has the CIA historically been anti-trans? That's the only way this makes halfway sense as a leopard eating face situation.

You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don't see this fitting the theme.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 17 points 1 month ago

Yes.

You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don’t see this fitting the theme.

What do you earnestly believe the CIA does‽

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

Anti-Trans because Laura Loomer had Trump's ear for a second. Probably told him there is a secret trans conspiracy deep state.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

She didn’t deserve it merely for existing. From my perspective, she deserved it for her asinine, inexplicable decision to continue serving an administration that clearly didn’t respect people like her. She continued to serve an administration that had become an enemy.

She could have just walked away, but instead walked across the street to piss at Starbucks, then walked right back.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

She was only two years away from a retirement pension when trump took office the second time.

Walking away from a career is not as easy as you're making it out to be. You think her work experience would apply to literally any civilian job outside of government contracting?

One thing about government employees is that they learn to ride out the waves when the political leanings of the administration switch back and forth. They learn to detach their personal beliefs and opinions from whoever is in office, because their job isn't supposed to be political.

This administration is an anomaly in that regard. But many careerists stayed under the belief that if they could keep the government working long enough, a new administration would come in and fix whatever this one breaks. They probably trusted in checks and balances to prevent things from getting this out of hand.

But yeah, two years away from a retirement pension, and then have to leave and go be a barista somewhere? In this economy?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Am I supposed to feel sorry for her because she decided to keep working for a fascist? She gambled the freedom of others on her pension. Fuck that.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Whoever your boss is, he's probably a fascist too. I've heard more than one leftist say there's no ethical employment under capitalism, that people just have to survive how they can. It's how they justify to themselves the fact that their whole lives are spent working to make oligarchs richer.

But obviously it doesn't apply when it's someone else doing it. No, can't have that can we?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you’re probably right. One of the things I hate most is hypocrisy. Sometimes I forget how easy it is to fall into that trap myself.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Happens to the best of us

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I can't believe you even had to ask that.

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

You're telling me you don't believe that the CIA hasn't always been a threat to trans people?

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

It's the CIA, do you think CIA only holds good secrets?

You mfs went berserk when all the shit about CIA came out and then called whistleblowers terrorists and what not, but didn't aim to fix a single fucking thing.

Yet you still think the people who work for them should get the benefit of the double and think they don't agree with the administration they work with?

If she didn't agree with Trump there would be a treasure trove of leaks and whistleblowing going through this bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Bud, the US government is the leopard. She betrayed everyone else by joining its actual genocide facilitation team as a trans woman; one of the groups the genocide facilitation team has targeted aggressively for decades.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago

Leopards would never eat MY face, said the woman who briefed face eating leopards

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago

On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

She stayed.

This is where my sympathy for her evaporated, and even causes me to question her judgment.

Make no mistake - I don’t agree with the administration’s actions, even a little. However, staying in a situation where you’re clearly, undeniably not wanted is a terrible choice.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Should climate scientists just quit then because Trump doesn't like what they're telling him about clean coal?

[-] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Why just quit, they can flee to a country that still cares about climate science and continue working on important research. The US isn't going to produce anything worthwhile in that field for at least two more years, the only studies they'll fund are ones that say coal, oil and natural gas are good for the environment.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

You’re acting like that’s so easy.

I sympathize with the notion, but quitting one's living is scary, especially if they have people To support. Immigrating somewhere else, finding a place that will take you, uprooting your whole life, is hard.

[-] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Actual insane argument. How the fuck do people think its so easy to just uproot and move like that. That is a major life choice and can be insanely hard and stressful.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's easy to argue from a chair.

...But yeah. The internet is littered with stories of academics who did just this, and how insanely hard it was for them. And the ones who write articles in major newspapers are the ones who sucessfully transitioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, leave the country to for a place that will accept them and their talents. Let the cespit rot and guard a socity that accepts you and is worth fighting for. America isn't the only place on earth hiring people like this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If your specific job is to advise Trump about climate science ... might as well, yeah. That's just a waste of time.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Remember, being trans doesn't exclude someone from being a massive piece of shit. You can even be transgender and anti LGBT. See Caitlyn Jenner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

This is not leopards eat my face material. Her job was to summarize intelligence for any elected official.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

I respectfully disagree.

The job changed on her, as jobs occasionally do. It became summarizing intelligence for an elected official who only recognized two sexes. She decided to stay regardless. The message of hateful intolerance was written on the wall as clearly as possible. Her choice to ignore that reality is how she got her face eaten.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

The job changed on her to Trump 1, then again to Biden, then again to Trump 2.

And she stayed because elected leaders need intelligence gathered from their own sources so they can make the best decision for their people.

Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

That’s a good point. Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

Would you add every other federal employee who lost their job?

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

If they lost it because of an obvious discriminatory policy against them, but they chose to ignore reality and remain a good little worker bee anyway, then yes.

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

That seems like appeasement to the asshole who want's them gone.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

That not appesment, that you chossing to move on and away from a country that clearly doesn't value you considering they let him in their in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alapakala@quokk.au 4 points 1 month ago

for any elected official

no no no

Let’s set some honest good faith arguments:

  • Who exactly does she answer to?
  • What intelligence did she gather?
  • For what purpose is that intelligence gathered?

Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

[-] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
  • The executive branch
  • Intelligence from every spy & spy satellite presumably.
  • To keep the president informed

Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

Yes. A decision has to be made with the best available information.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Emotional@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

I'm not a fan of the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

Anyway, here's my hot take: she doesn't deserve to be discriminated against.

[-] orioler25@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

You're wrong. It isn't "victim blaming" to condemn traitors. This woman helped the single greatest threat to trans people internationally, allowed the CIA to recruit more traitors with her words, apparently even aided in the establishment of a regime within the metropole that explicitly intends to eradicate trans people within its borders. This woman only left after they made her and not after trans people were fucking ridiculed for being trans in the new fucking work camps?

I wish you people would actually defend trans people the way you defend toothless liberal values, this woman is not an ally and never has been. If any of you people think cooperation with fascists benefits us in any way, here you go.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

Nobody on both threads are discriminating her for being trans. We are discriminating a snitch for snitching against others’ wills. What part of espionage is deserves blaming‽

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Every time I hear about something like this I get the feeling that it’s actually because that person is ethical and wouldn’t sell their secrets to the highest bidder rather than being about the thing they say.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 6 points 1 month ago

I hate how the intelligence “community” is already defending her selling secrets to The White House, because foreigners also do not deserve their secrets stay secret. Cry me a river, your job was snitching to leopards where prey is at!

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

FFS of all the people you KNOW can keep a fucking secret...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
152 points (93.2% liked)

LeopardsAteMyFace

943 readers
230 users here now

'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS