this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
176 points (100.0% liked)

News

38841 readers
2220 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PJM Interconnection, the grid operator serving 67 million people across 13 states and Washington, D.C., asked federal regulators on Thursday to approve rules that would cut power to new data centers ahead of households during supply shortages, Reuters reports.

The filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission follows two consecutive capacity auctions that failed to secure enough generation, and PJM's board projects roughly 70 GW of new large load by 2038 against roughly 15 GW of generation retired since 2022.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

50MW-plus data centers must bring their own electricity generation to avoid shutoffs

And the fossil fuel death-cultists who usurped the government are champing at the bit to let them have it in the most polluting way possible.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 10 minutes ago

Backup generators are the only reasonable alternative at this scale if the grid goes down. Battery banks last minutes, and are only good to allow for diesel to kick in.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 44 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

That aerial picture though. Imagine spending your life's savings into a house in a quiet neighbourhood with direct access to a nice nature waterfront walk and this monstrosity gets built almost in your backyard.

[–] robear@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I think you've confused suburban McMansions with a nice place to live.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 14 points 13 hours ago

A bit of a guess but I think this is the data centre in the picture: https://maps.app.goo.gl/8MGY8u3cfdPEGDyC8?g_st=ac

Here it is in a zoning map with the data centre circled:

IP is zoning for an industrial park and GI is "General Industry: District for industrial uses that are incompatible with residential uses due to the prevalence of outdoor storage and emissions of noise and odor."

Sure, zoning changes but given the distribution and proximity to the airport and quarries it seems unlikely it's all amendments. This very wary engineer is literally begging people to read zoning maps and flood plain maps before buying a house.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Any politician who says they are for a data center moratorium. In other words, no new data centers. For a period of at least 10 years while we do an environmental economical and health study I’m voting for.

For the record, I tend to vote, pure democratic line. But if the Republicans came out in favor of this going against data centers. I’m sorry I’d be voting for them. And any politician who knocks on my door or any of their door knockers that they have out here I tell them that. I don’t want to vote for Republicans, but if they’re willing to shut down this madness about data centers in neighborhoods, Or anywhere near neighborhood. Or having private citizen, subsidize electrical power consumption for data centers. I’m voting for that politician.

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Admitting you'd belive a republican is wild. Why would you trust them???

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"I'm willing to over look the continued support of the genocide of immigrants in my country if it gets rid of data centers," is a pretty wild take.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Single-issue anti-genocide voters ended up forcing the outcome that maximized genocide, so IDGAF what they have to say about it.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Single-issue anti-genocide voters ended up forcing the outcome that maximized genocide

By not voting for a Democrat.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I should've paid more attention to the GP's comment, where he said he'd even be willing to vote Republican. Single issue anti-data-center voters are just as fucked up.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Great then get the democrats to vote against data centers. I’ve tried. Over and over again. They keep saying “yeah we’ll stop the data centers or at least put a pause on them” then they do nothing. So at this point… I’m doing what is needed to stop the data centers: so start making calls to the democrats and help fix this. Or I’ll vote for those that will. And to be honest I do not want to vote for a Republican.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Data center owners: “Diesel generators, it is!”

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 hours ago

"If I can burn it, it'll turn it."

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That might be good for nuclear SMR manufacturers. If what you're being told is "you cannot run a high-electricity-load business and have reliable power from the grid---you need to find a large source of electricity near where you operate", someone who can deploy a shit-ton of off-the-shelf sustained power generation at a particular location might have themselves a market.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

The US is yet to produce a deployed SMR. In Canada construction of our first started in 2025 and it's expected to come online in 2030, so probably after 2030. These timelines don't look amazing at all for deploying power for the needs of hyperscale datacenters.

[–] churrodestroyer@lemmy.zip 0 points 13 hours ago

It's the only thing that makes sense.