this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
116 points (96.0% liked)

Buy European

10735 readers
165 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The EU wants to decrease reliance on American technology. Hereโ€™s what happened when a POLITICO reporter tried to live and work without it.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The only American software I run is FOSS. I've got no problems with FOSS devs of any country. American corporations are the swollen sore on your lip you keep biting. Get rid of them and the world's your oyster.

[โ€“] vogi@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I kinda feel like all dumb phones have to do is ship with an Signal client, the lack of WhatsApp was apparently the driving reason why the reporter went back and I think its more reasonable to expect friends to move to Signal than to SMS. (Its also really unsecure)
There are a couple of community made clients I wonder how hard it is to implement the signal protocol.

[โ€“] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

It's open. Just compile your own client. Though it's be allowed on the Signal network. So you have speed up a server too. American and open isn't a problem.

[โ€“] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Signal is American too though

[โ€“] vogi@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I mean tbh it feels like the EU is putting more pressure on private chats than America does, at least right now. I am not sure how things are in Asia. I think the bigger problem is their reliance on AWS if Bezos or some friend of his does not want Signal to be a thing they can probably just switch it off fairly easy.

[โ€“] Europellinore@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

True, but itโ€™s not owned by privacy enemy and trump slave Zuckerberg, or a similar big tech bro

[โ€“] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To be fair, I recently discovered RCS messages. Very cool. I've been using those quite a bit recently and with many people I do not need Whatsapp anymore.

[โ€“] vogi@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I did try RCS with a couple of friends and its great.

The only problem I have with it is the same I have with WhatsApp is that I cannot make sure what is happening on the server side (or even on the client side for that matter if its closed source) and what they are doing with the meta data. It seems like they would still be able to map out with whom I talk to and when (even if the content is encrypted which is not the default with RCS i believe).

[โ€“] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Messages are end to end encrypted, I believe it is by default.

Google definitely has some metadata if you use the android app, at the very least the list of your contacts.

Regarding who you talk to, maybe: messages do not necessarily go through the servers of Google, it depends whether your carrier has their own servers.

Either way, I do see this as a great advantage over Whatsapp: while this system is still mostly controlled by Google the underlying technology most definitely is designed for decentralization and I know quite a few carriers are beginning to support it.

[โ€“] tramdan@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can't use RCS without Google, though.

[โ€“] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't use WhatsApp without Meta. What's your point?

[โ€“] tramdan@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point is not relying on US tech. It's in the title.

[โ€“] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

The person went back to the smartphone in order to use WhatsApp. I feel RCS is a better option as it doesn't strictly need Google, the reason why it is google is that google has developed the only application which supports RCS.

[โ€“] Edges@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'll never understand the hold whatsapp has on people

[โ€“] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

It's not even whatsapp specifically. I used to live in a place that only did Viber. Which is just Whatsapp with ads, themed purple. Everyone was on it, and people on whatsapp were maybe 50/50 at best. But without Viber, you didn't exist and couldn't message anyone and expect a response.

[โ€“] LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The network effect: If everyone you ever message is there and stays there, it's hard to leave...

[โ€“] mabeledo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, itโ€™s pretty clear from a sociological perspective: whatโ€™s the point of a messaging app you cannot use to message anyone?

I swear sometimes Lemmy people need to go out a bit more often.

[โ€“] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I think it's more that Lemmy folks assume a lot of universal context from what they know. So maybe get out more and need to interact with humans, but also experience more of the world.

Some American that only uses iMessage will have no idea what entire continents of people use Whatsapp more than anything else, including to just make calls.

[โ€“] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

Fr omg, it's like they can't comprehend having a social life

[โ€“] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Go split your emails over 3 different clients and open only some in 1 and others in another.

For me it's no big deal but centralisation feels good in lots of circumstances.

[โ€“] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I'll never understand the hold any of these apps have on people.

[โ€“] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's physchology I think.

People who feel they need to have regular communal celebration of their every thought and act really struggle to consider losing a few contacts who refuse to move to better alternatives. People who are happy to recieve the same ego strokes through fewer closer peers are ok with the move.

Same with leaving Facebook, Twitter, etc..

[โ€“] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

With messaging apps unless the new app does something new they want, people won't even think about it. Here in Spain the only other app is telegram because it has a bunch of extra things, if the new app does the same why bother. A year ago I installed Signal, only three of my contacts were there and no one else has appeared since.

Edit: I just checked, now I have 8 contacts on Signal. Yay! Maybe there is hope

[โ€“] Europellinore@europe.pub 3 points 2 days ago

Here (Netherlands) basically all our family and friends app groups moved to Signal. Only some groups with parents of the kidsโ€™ school class, or colleagues, stubbornly keep clinged to whatsapp. For most cases, some negative news items about whatsapp/Meta/zuckerberg with regards to privacy and/or Zuckerbergs Trump-fetisjism, created enough momentum to move at least half of the group to another app (signal in this case). Afterwards, FOMO usually does the job in getting the other people over as well.

[โ€“] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Some people actually have a social life and that often requires texting people that aren't just your close friends you could convince of switching to Signal

[โ€“] dmalteseknight@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am confused as to why they went with a dumb phone. Why not go with a non american degoogled android phone? Or to even go a step further, get a sailfish OS powered phone.

[โ€“] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The narrator did not want to buy things just for an experiment.

Notice this sentence (emphasis mine):

On that first morning, with my iPhone shut off, I reached for a Nokia brick from Finland.

[โ€“] dmalteseknight@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Pardon me if I am being presumptuous but the title seem to imply that the author was going to use somewhat equivalent non US alternatives rather than rummaging through what they already own.

To use an analogy, it is as if you have an article titled "I survived 72 hours without eating processed foods" and the author opted not to buy non processed alternatives and just work with with whatever they have at their home. Then you learn it was a couple of onions and a tomato they had in the fridge. If they say they were starving by the end of the experiment, it does not really paint an honest picture of how hard it is to get by without processed foods.

I believe the title and the article were written by different people