124
rule (lemmy.nz)
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 days ago

This is your reminder that that pic of Stalin was HEAVILY edited by the KGB to make him look more handsome.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

just to remind that, even before photo-manipulation software and digital photography became the default, photographers regularly edited photographs in the darkroom during exposure. It's not difficult to prevent scars & blemishes from appearing on the final print.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

And all the names in editing tools stem from that time (dodging, burning etc)

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, I'd like a source too. The pic has been floating around a lot, first time I hear it's edited.

This version is on Wikipedia, no mention of it being modified (it looks different from the one in OP but as far as I see just due to sharpness and contrast):

[-] muzzle@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 days ago

Since it took me a while to understand :

The top pictures are Stalin and Hasan Piker. The bottom pics are Trotskij and Sam Hyde.

Sam Hyde is associated with alt-right edgy internet subcultures, while Hasan Piker is a prominent left-wing political commentators on Twitch.

​After winning a creator boxing match in 2022, Hyde issued an aggressive, surreal callout to Piker. He generally dismissed or ignored the challenge.

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You actually understood it better than I did, and I posted it, lol

[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

He had smallpox at age 6 and was heavily scarred on his face and neck. Looking for pre-edit photos if I can find them.

[-] kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

that sounds like an interesting read, please do post a reference if you can!

[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

Jokes aside I'm actually curious too

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Source? If you don't provide any I'm going to assume it's propaganda/cope.

I mean they're the same group that released these images of Lenin, were they also doctored?

[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago
[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago

Wow, solid. Thanks for following up

Not even ascribing any value judgments to damage done by a childhood disease. I just wanted to see how the photos were changed

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So, it has to be admitted that there's no strong, direct evidence for it. The main argument in that thread is that he's supposed to have some scarring, but none of the other photos from the time period show them either, so the guy just concludes they all must've been edited.

And yes, the look is somewhat different from the other photos, mainly the eyes, more widely open than on the other pics. But people can hold different facial expressions...

[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, ok. You can choose to believe in sexy Stalin if you want. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It's not going to make much of a difference for me either way, I don't like people just because they're sexy.

You dropped an arm there, btw, here you go: \

Make sure you reinforce it this time, type it like this: \\

[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the arm tip, I always forget. Have a keyboard shortcut in my phone for that guy, haha.

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Now his arms are short, wtf 😓

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯

Turns out it takes three slashes, one has to block the underscores from italicising the middle

[-] ephrin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Haha, there we go! Third time’s a charm.

[-] paranoia@feddit.dk 8 points 3 days ago

lemmy.ml

Ok sorry but that's kind of hilarious

[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago

It's not even a bit. They just do that

[-] kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

~~asking for a source(s) to back up a claim is perfectly reasonable thing to do, .ml user or not~~

oops conflated you with the original poster of the main comment sorry

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 days ago

You hate Malaysians or something?

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

.ml is Mali.

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago

That's not what the ".ml" means in this context. Perhaps it ought to, though, I always thought english speakers buying up all the .io or .ai domains felt a little colonialist.

In this case, "ml" means Marxist-Leninist. (And that's what person who created lemmy intended it to mean, that's not just me saying it.)

[-] FleetwoodLinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

The devs have stated before that the Mali TLD used to be free and that's why they picked it. https://lemmy.ml/post/68360/58307

[-] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

Calling Trotsky right-wing is fucking brain dead

hasan stop getting hotter challenge

[-] minty@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Naruto and Sasuke

[-] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

Why did you have to remind me of Sam Hyde?

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Ngl I saved this meme a long time ago. I remembered I found it funny, but as I was posting it here I realised I forgot who's the guy in the lower right. Some right wing shithead, but I just couldn't remember the name.

So, thank you for reminding me of Sam Hyde 👍

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
124 points (95.6% liked)

196

6741 readers
1218 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS