223
submitted 21 hours ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

DEVIGHAT, Nepal (AP) — Rescue teams searched on Thursday for hundreds of missing people along the Nepal-China border after a catastrophic and deadly torrent of floods and mud swept through several communities a day earlier following a glacier collapse.

The disaster left at least 168 people dead and more than 1,300 missing, including foreigners and pilgrims, and displaced hundreds of people across the Himalayan region.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] stretch2m@infosec.pub 11 points 6 hours ago

If I lived anywhere downstream of a glacier, I would be getting quite nervous. Those videos are harrowing. The one at the border crossing looks like a scene from a Hollywood disaster movie.

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Donate to the Nepal Red Cross

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 10 points 7 hours ago

Melting glaciers have become more common because of human-caused climate change.

Holy crap! I'm not used to the media acknowledging anthropogenic climate change! Thank you, Associated Press!

[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

There's gotta be way more missing than that. Those videos are completely insane.

[-] Tiral@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

There are. It's the CCP, well they were taken over by the CCP, it's like Hong Kong.... it's CCP controlled but called Hong Kong. Anyways, you need to probably 5x the missing toll from whatever is publicly reported. China is still dying in the hill that they had 60k covid deaths when it's closer to 1-1.5 million.

[-] motoxjake@lemmy.zip 41 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Terrifying video and the lives lost is saddening.

[-] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 22 points 18 hours ago

Terrifying video

my god you weren't exaggerating, that is absolutely horrific

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago

Jesus christ I can't believe how fast that water/debris is moving. It almost looks like VFX from a movie.

[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Thought the same. Looks like that movie 2012 or something, it just doesn’t seem believable that something that cataclysmic could happen. Horrifying and tragic

[-] WizardGed@lemmy.ca 16 points 19 hours ago

That's devastating, the kind of power behind that and with how fast it must have moved I doubt there was much of a chance for those in the way to escape. Not much you can do to stop a massive glacier like that from collapsing in this warming world. The people affected by this have my deepest sympathies.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 hours ago

The video showed the timeframe for it. About ten paces worth of running was the most they had.

[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 5 points 20 hours ago

has it been proven to be a glacier collapse? I listened to a Nepalese Govt radio interview in which they stated it was an earthquake

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/27/what-caused-the-catastrophic-flash-flood-in-nepal-and-tibet-and-how-does-a-glacier-collapse

However, the US Geological Survey (USGS) said that while the event was initially reported to be caused by a magnitude 4.4 earthquake, further analysis showed the “seismic event was a glacial collapse and debris flow that caused subsequent catastrophic impacts downstream” and “no earthquake had occurred”.

The USGS noted the glacial collapse had registered as a magnitude 5.2 seismic event on the Richter scale, occurring near the border between Nepal and China at 8.37am local time on Wednesday.

According to Assoc Prof Daniel Shugar, a geomorphologist at the University of Calgary in Canada, initial satellite analysis showed a 0.2 sq km chunk of ice “collapsed about 1.2km vertically”.

“What I can see in … satellite imagery from Planet Labs, the lower part of a glacier broke off at about 5,200 metres and crashed onto the valley floor about 1,200 metres below,” he wrote on Bluesky.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 hours ago

So much carnage from something so relatively small, but doing the math, a 0.2 cubic chunk would weigh a nice massive 200 million metric tons.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

That would be 8,000,000 cubic meters, mostly ice I think. Seems to be happening a lot lately.

This one from alaska last year was 64M cubic meters of rock (related to melting glaciers I guess?):

The sheer power of that amount of rock plunging into the fjord in under a minute created a gigantic wave almost 500 metres tall.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1m253033m4o

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 7 points 19 hours ago

I think the latest theory is that is was a landslide that caused a partial glacier collapse, and the force of that registered as an earthquake on instruments.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
223 points (99.6% liked)

News

38974 readers
2611 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS