72
submitted 2 hours ago by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Axon says cops are asking it to make its automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) look different from Flock cameras because Flock vandalism has become so widespread, according to comments Axon’s CEO made in a now deleted webinar.

The comments highlight how Axon is trying to take advantage of sustained opposition against Flock's license plate cameras, with one law enforcement customer suggesting a camera redesign would “help with the optics while we batten down the hatches” as the backlash spreads.

As 404 Media has reported, some towns and cities are switching from Flock to Axon’s cameras after cops did lookups for ICE in Flock, tracked a woman who self-administered an abortion, and have repeatedly abused their access to stalk ex-spouses. ALPRs constantly scan the license plate, brand, model, and other identifying features of all vehicles that drive past the camera and then make this timestamped log of activity searchable by law enforcement without a warrant.

In an August 26 webinar that was hosted on Axon’s official Vimeo page called “From backlash to trust,” Axon Chief Customer Officer Mike Wagers took a question from the remote audience and asked, “is there any talk — and there has been talk — to redesign Outpost, our fixed ALPR camera, to not look exactly like a Flock camera?”

“We are looking at [...] do we change the general shape,” Rick Smith, Axon’s CEO, replied. At another point in the webinar, Smith brought up Axon’s Lightpost product, which is an ALPR and AI-powered camera that attaches to an existing streetlight. “Frankly, we’ve had a lot of customers saying, hey, we’d like something that looks different because there is all this blowback. ​​It's harder to vandalize because it's up higher,” he said.

Smith also said, “We’ve had some people say they’d like to see us make just a different camera, because our ALPR camera looks like an ALPR camera.” Another idea Smith brought up, pending customer feedback, is to go in the other direction and make ALPRs more explicit, with signs showing where they are located and a description of the city’s ALPR policies.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 21 points 1 hour ago

Doesn't matter, destroy them anyway.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Doesn’t matter, destroy them anyway.

You going to be able to reach these?

an ALPR and AI-powered camera that attaches to an existing streetlight. “Frankly, we’ve had a lot of customers saying, hey, we’d like something that looks different because there is all this blowback. ​​It’s harder to vandalize because it’s up higher

Maybe a paintball gun? What about a crossbow?

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago

I think a higher powered laser pointer could ruin the camera lens.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 42 minutes ago

Or fry the sensor.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

A pruning pull with a rope that lets you hit a taped on spray paint can should do the trick.

Or an RC heli that does similar.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Tons of flock cameras are mounted similarly, Flock just provided the option of the freestanding pole mount to make them more flexible for less built up areas so lots have used those.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago

Motivation breeds innovation.

[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

I really am hoping for a esp32 hack that we can just force a looped viseo feed into them. Destroying is cool. But disabling them without them knowing. Chef's kiss.

I heard their security is absolute garbage.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 33 minutes ago

They're getting better after all the hacks and blowback. Randomized MACs, disabling Bluetooth, transmitting only on activity to hide packet traffic, and using cell as a primary connection.

Which means they're scared.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I bet someone clever can build a stingray and capture the cell signal.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 6 minutes ago

"People hate the Flock cameras so we'll replace them with a different brand of camera." Are they really that stupid to think it's the "Flock" part and not the "camera" part that people are upset about? Or that making them look different will make everyone go, "oh, that's all right then as long as they don't look like the Flock ones go ahead and surveil us"?

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 13 points 1 hour ago

The stupid fuckers who think ALPRs are a good idea are also the stupid fuckers that think that the public only hate Flock ALPRs.

They can’t understand that the public hate all ALPRs.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 hour ago

They can’t understand that the public hate all ALPRs.

Oh no, they 100% understand that. They are betting on more obfuscation of the installations being enough to fool the idiot public into thinking they're not being tracked.

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 59 minutes ago

It is amazing how stupid people assume everyone else is as stupid as them. Dunning-Kruger effect in full force.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 40 minutes ago

The problem is a lot of people really are that stupid. That's what gets us into these messes.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

It! Methheads and crackis…. The new look has more copper. Just saying.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

They don't get that the only winning move PR-wise is to drop those cameras and work on transparency.

[-] Dagamant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Cops: people are attacking them because they are black

People: what?

Cops: it’s what we would do…

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)

News

39046 readers
3285 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS