309
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Here is every Democrat who voted to take funding away from universities that boycott Israel:

  • Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts)
  • Kathy Castor (Florida)
  • Gilbert Ray Cisneros Jr. (California)
  • Jim Costa (California)
  • Joe Courtney (Connecticut)
  • Henry Cuellar (Texas)
  • Donald G. Davis (North Carolina)
  • Lois Frankel (Florida)
  • Laura Gillen (New York)
  • Jared F. Golden (Maine)
  • Vicente Gonzalez (Texas)
  • Greg Landsman (Ohio)
  • George Latimer (New York)
  • Susie Lee (Nevada)
  • John W. Mannion (New York)
  • Jared Moskowitz (Florida)
  • Donald Norcross (New Jersey)
  • Jimmy Panetta (California)
  • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington)
  • Josh Riley (New York)
  • Bradley Scott Schneider (Illinois)
  • Hillary J. Scholten (Michigan)
  • Kim Schrier (Washington)
  • Brad Sherman (California)
  • Darren Soto (Florida)
  • Haley M. Stevens (Michigan)
  • Thomas R. Suozzi (New York)
  • Shri Thanedar (Michigan)
  • Dina Titus (Nevada)
  • Ritchie Torres (New York)
  • Juan Vargas (California)
  • Eugene Simon Vindman (Virginia)
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

So the other day I asked what the Republican-lite supporters excuse for Democrats once again saving Republicans and then also voting to condemn socialism and now this.

So what's the excuse du jour for supporting fascism? Literally voting to punish speech here, what's the excuse?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I mean, don't vote for them...

But not voting for anyone else with a D by their name because of these asshats, is just going to let these asshats take over the party.

Most Americans don't get to vote in any election that has any of them on a ballot.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 1 month ago

Counterpoint, if we don't vote for these D then we end up with an R in their district which is just worse in every way.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Women with funny laughs tend to.do this, it seems.

I’m guessing it’s not about fascist ideology, and more about those AIPAC paid vacations they’ve already packed their luggage for. Doesn’t change that they are a piece of shit, only if they have corn or peanuts.

Okay - I just made myself gag.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Brings to mind that saying about sitting for dinner with 9 Nazis right?

[-] Wataba@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

So people who refused to get up and leave (vote) when the Nazis barged in and took their seat at the table are just as culpable then.

Good to know.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah, I see you choose to be obtuse and dense as a fruit cake.

You mean the people who refused to get up and leave and then voted for fascism are just as culpable? Yes.

You mean a leadership that will do fuck all to punish these Republican-lite assholes for literally voting for Nazi policies are just as culpable. Yes.

The other members who left the table and voted no on this issue. No. For now.

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They do this to fracture the Dem party. Keep your adversaries in disarray.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, mine's up there and in general most hate that but he's still far better than a Republican in his spot.

Hopefully next time we have a primary challenger worth voting for because his challenger voted for trump. Yeah....

So I'll put up with him for another two years because while his Israel bullshit sucks it's the better of the two options in almost any other issue on the table.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And when does the whole "still better than nothing" stop being a viable option when you're still marching toward fascism with no meaningful resistance from the supposed opposition?

Honestly it's past time to stop voting for these Republican-lite, fascist enablers.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

It's never not a viable option. Voting takes a whole five minutes. There's literally no excuse to not participate and minimize damage. Whether you decide to do more after that is what this should influence, not whether you vote. If you choose to not vote then you're just a useful idiot.

Abstaining is propaganda pushed by Republicans. I don't know if you actually believe the message you're pushing or if you just bought the bullshit they sold you, but if you actually believe it then you're only harming your own cause. There's a reason this message gets spread so much, and it's because it's paid for. The only thing abstaining does is makes you feel superior while, in reality, you accomplish nothing.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

And you're the useful idiot that Republican-lite love. Vote blue no matter who, never think about changing the status quo, never hold them accountable for their actions. Just keep on swimming. They love their moderate do nothing useful idiots.

And abstaining from voting as a form of protest is a time honored tradition. But sure go ahead and provide proof that Republicans are pushing abstaining from voting. They're pushing propaganda about the security of voting to enact laws curtailing the right to vote, plenty of evidence for that. Honestly, you sound like conspiracy theory Republican with your bought and paid message speil, going to blame it on George Soros next?

As far as you state abstaining/protest voting does nothing, I believe it does depending on how it's done. We've certainly seen how it has changed politics with Ross Perot and how it lead to MAGA. We've seen how it affected things recently with Dearborn abandon voters and how their stance has accelerated saying fuck AIPAC.

No thanks to your moderate paradise of slow walking fascism, I'll consider acceleration and live with the consequences sooner rather than later.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Youre the useful idiot Republicans love. Congrats.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And, he knew you would vote that way. Good job!

[-] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Allowing yourself to be manipulated by a shithead in hopes of getting rid of them later is generally preferable to shooting yourself in the foot and ending up with an even bigger shithead

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Perky@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

Oh look, Cuellar is being a sack of shit, what a huge surprise.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He really is the Fetterman of the House.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, he's shit but I mean, Texas. Not saying he gets a pass but, Texas.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Proud that my Rep, Melanie Stansbury is not on this list. I would have been shocked if she had been.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Upset that my rep, Auchincloss is. I knew he would be.

Really I'm more upset that he won by 50 points.

[-] Lorchedar@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago

Damn. Mine's on the list (Panetta).

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

This one is the east side and full of republicans. Not surprising, but disappointing for Kim Shrier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington's_8th_congressional_district

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

She has been voting along AIPAC's lines for a while. Sadly she doesn't seem to have any serious challengers to unseat her. She is deffo a DINO.

[-] Casuls_Die_Thrice@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Hmm; my rep's not on the list, but the one for a district adjacent to mine is.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Surprised resident shit bird Ed Case isn't on that list.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The link on the page of the Roll Call just takes you to the link I provided, which states the bill has only been introduced and not passed.

There have been several actions such as including it with a group of other bills for consideration or sending it to committees.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I posted the roll call of votes. They voted, it passed. The progress bar is behind.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep, your right, I read the number wrong. The page is behind, the clerks page logged the votes today on the resolution. That's definitely my bad.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Either way. These people need voted out.

[-] savvie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

MGP of WA — what a surprise!!! /s

[-] HostilePasta@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah Minnesota winning again.

[-] peacepath@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Excuse me to be naive, but since democrats voted against slavery abrogation, how can it be seen as anything else than a far-right party?

Republican are clearly far-rightists too, ok... but still...

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

In case you're genuinely curious and not trolling, I'll explain. Parties in the US are not fixed around a particular ideology or set of stances, but have changed frequently throughout history and often take completely opposite positions from their past iterations. Many historians like to divide US political history into eras called party systems to indicate when parties are roughly cohesive and when they go through major changes, and during the civil war era we were in the Third Party System. During the third party system the Democratic party's base was made up primarily of white southerners (though there were northern supporters as well) and after the civil war they fought against Reconstruction in order to uphold white supremacy (the only issue that united Democratic voters in the north and south at the time).

Though there isn't consensus among historians yet, many consider us to be in the Seventh Party System now, so as you can imagine a lot has changed since then. I'll let you do your own reading on that topic.

[-] peacepath@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Thanks, it makes it more clear...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
309 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31338 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS