10
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn't patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the "Translate Page" feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there's no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed "spammy" or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you're logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google's end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I'd be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto's. Can't really control that.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] stevles@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Duck is as good as Google was before they got gimped by laws and insane levels of advertising. Have been using it religiously for months, no issues.

[-] Bumrocky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This. Can't tell you the last time I used Google directly.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don't want to get scraped themselves?

That's the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

[-] MadBits@europe.pub 0 points 1 week ago

That's why everyone should try and avoid google and use some alternatives.

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

DuckDuck is literally right here.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

And it'll even sometimes show relevant results!

Seriously though, noai.ddg is my default, but I still have to switch to google way too often.

[-] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago
[-] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wasn't aware of Qwant. It seems to build its own index instead of relying on other providers (great), and has proper backing to be a viable competitor in something so big (the French government seems to endorse it; along with institutional use in EU parliament?).
I just tested it and unfortunately got a 403 however (FORBIDDEN). Though I was behind an endpoint of a very popular VPN for some testing, that sucks regardless.

Actually, before I could post this, I tried the search refresh and it worked somehow.
To test again I switched to another server of the same VPN provider (same selected country) and tried searching. Same error, which didn't go away after doing the refresh. So they might have some sort of spam prevention measure which eases itself automatically, but I feel like it could definitely be implemented better if that's the case.

Edit: Yep, if you sit on that 403 page for 5-6 minutes without doing anything and then hit the relaunch your search button, things work as intended afterwards.

[-] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

turn off your adblocker

edit: lmao why so many downvotes? this is what qwant does when you use an adblocker

[-] pumpupthejam@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago

Who raw dogs the Internet?

[-] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

if you have a good adblocker, you can turn it off for sites that have responsible policies with privacy and advertising and are barely scraping by as it is.

if you can't turn your adblocker for specific sites, get a better one. ublock origin is great.

in case you can't stand ads and need an ethical search engine get something like kagi. you have to pay for it but these websites can't operate for free. don't leech off companies that are struggling.

[-] Seimhe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Surprised nobody has mentioned Ecosia yet. Web searches there are responsible for planting 250,000,000 trees. I can’t think of a better justification for using a search engine.

[-] Danitos@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

From there FAQ:

Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. [...]

How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

[...] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. [...]

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Looks like they have a browser too. Anyone know if it's chromium?

[-] Seimhe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[-] LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 week ago

Of course it is. I will never not be surprised by the overabundance of chromium based browsers. You’ve got 50:5 Chrome vs. Firefox/Swiftkit alternatives. It’s pathetic honestly.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87986 readers
2500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS