67
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by supersquirrel@lemmy.ca to c/world@quokk.au

But 44% of the vote for a party that is officially classified as “extreme right” is not normal. It is a black day for European democracy, even if it occurs in a small east German state.

...

While Saxony-Anhalt (and Germany itself) may have dodged the worst outcome because the AfD won’t automatically fulfil its ambition of forming the first far-right state government in Germany since the Nazi era, there is no reason to assume it will be so lucky at the next election. Neither will other German states, such as Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in two weeks’ time, or other countries, such as France next year. No country is immune from the far right and, perhaps even more worryingly, no far-right party or politician is too extreme for political success (as the US has shown). We must therefore update our analyses and strategies.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/09/07/esuu-s07.html

The Nazis achieved a better result in a state election on only two occasions before Hitler’s coming to power in January 1933—in May 1932 in Oldenburg, with 48.4 percent, and June 1932 in Mecklenburg-Schwerin, with 49 percent. In Anhalt (part of what is now Saxony-Anhalt), the Nazis secured 40.7 percent in April 1932 and formed one of the first Nazi-led state governments. In the Reichstag election in November 1932, the last before Hitler’s appointment as chancellor, the Nazis received 33.1 percent. Since the end of the Third Reich, no far-right party has ever again achieved a comparably high election result.

This result does not mean that every AfD voter is a Nazi. The AfD is not a fascist mass party. It is a product of the shift to the right across the entire bourgeois political spectrum and owes its rise to the degeneration of the trade unions and the parties that once claimed to represent the interests of the workers. They have betrayed the workers so often and so thoroughly that the AfD has been able to capitalise on the outrage and frustration this has caused.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Deyis@beehaw.org 9 points 1 week ago

What can be done to stop the far-right when their political opposition is too lacklustre to make any meaningful change? There's only so many Nazis I can personally punch.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

We must try ignoring the problem and ganging up on leftists because the simplicity and violence feels good!

/s

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 1 week ago

The World Socialist Website is a Chinese propaganda site that support the Chinese Communist Party, including its aggression against Taiwan. Some may say that it fits to the topic as the Chinese government support Germany’s far-right as we know, but this wsws/org is not a reliable source of information. This is a pure propaganda source.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Literally the only thing I seem to see you do @tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org is fearmonger about China and I don't think it is very effective.

Please come up with a new obsession.

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 1 week ago

Even if this were true, it's better than supporting a dictatorial regime as you apparently do.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

How is your unbacked up accusation I supposedly support a dictatorial regime ontopic to this post?

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why you don't have a single post about the dictatorship that are allied to the West? You are not against dictatorships , you are against any countries who compete with the west dominance

[-] redparadise@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Using the Guardian is implicitly supporting the dictatorial regime of the United States, the US is incredibly undemocratic democratic given how capitalists have completely unfettered access to manipulate and run elections through their money.

Hell even worse in how negative ramifications of those affect the entire world through US imperialism, including its aggressions towards China, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, Mexico, Palestine, Niacaragua, Yemen etc..

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Using the Guardian is implicitly supporting the dictatorial regime of the United States

The guardian is from the UK

[-] redparadise@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Neither is WSWS from China

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Oopsie Poopsie, you levied fair criticism on China on Lemmy, prepare to be down voted to oblivion by the tankies

Take my upvote and try to stay afloat

[-] F6FHellcat@feddit.online 3 points 1 week ago

The far right.
AKA the regular, normal people.

[-] GardenGeek@europe.pub 3 points 1 week ago

The voters? Most likely... perhaps a bit simple-minded, since they obviously either don't read or don't understand their party's platform.

The party leaders? They are highly corrupt neoliberals, often Nazis and fascists as well. There's nothing “normal” about them.

[-] FluidBeef@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago

Pig farmers and tailors.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2454 readers
1000 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS