175
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

when a lego project calls for a civil engineer

[-] picnicolas@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

When a Lego loving kid becomes a civil engineer

[-] Hal@piefed.nz 20 points 3 days ago

Damn, and I thought I was doing well building from the floor to the ceiling. Mine was freestanding though, it didn't need cranes to hold it up.

The cranes aren’t holding it up the cable stays are keeping it from falling over.

[-] Hal@piefed.nz 7 points 3 days ago

Sorry you're right, it's not cranes and they aren't holding it up just keeping it steady. But my tower didn't need that, I built it strong enough it could atand of it's own accord.

Only to the ceiling, mind you. I don't have enough lego to go up 36 metres.

Theirs is strong enough to stand it’s just not stable enough to.

[-] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Weird distinction. I could pile concrete blocks 5 miles up. They are strong enough, just not stable enough. So, this would be the tallest supported lego structure.

If you stacked them into a five mile high pyramid they’d be strong enough and stable enough too.

[-] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Have you tried designing a TMD system to keep a tower stright at all times

[-] Hal@piefed.nz 1 points 2 days ago

I wonder if there's a separate record that doesn't allow the cables, where teams need to use these kinds of things to prevent it falling. Would probably have to be done indoors, away from wind.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

My brother and I did the same thing once as kids. God, that was a blast. Dad even helped us put the last bricks at the top.

[-] procrastitron@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t count unless those are Lego brand guide wires.

(Although I’d let it slide if they were Mega Bloks wires)

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

They should have built a Lego pyramid, wouldn't have needed the cables.

[-] HuePony@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

It would cost like new data center

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

How tall can a lego structure get before the base bricks fail?

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the corridor crew has a video on this and they mention the hydraulic press experiment @9:40 and added some cool visuals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68oXafUzirE

spoiler~375'000 bricks ~ 3.6km

And in the end, they show a pyramid around that height (4x higher than Burj Khalifa, just smaller than the mount Fuji) and how much it would cost, which is completely unrealistic at that point, as it'd use up all the oil in the world.

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

I don't have numbers for you, but here's some Lego vs. a hydraulic press and it survives pretty well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l10hJxV4SGo

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

At least as tall as a traffic cone I'd say.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well they're on a wide base to distribute load among many bricks.

Do this enough and the only limit is bricks melting under the heat of the pressure.

[-] Alexfire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

At first I thought the base of it was blurred out for some reason lol!

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Incoming sibling to wreck that tower

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
[-] AviAdi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It's fantastic!

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
175 points (94.4% liked)

interestingasfuck

9753 readers
930 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS