12
submitted 1 week ago by beep@piefed.world to c/space@mander.xyz
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

The article this pop-sci article is based on is weird.

It takes a number of observations of near-surface water ice, slaps a 30x multiplier on there, and then calls that an estimate of the total water mass on the moon. No justification for the 30x multiplication, no error bars, no citations for actual estimations. Just call it "one billion" and work from there.

It seems like the purpose of the article is not to get accurate answers, but to put down tech bro fantasies.

[-] jobble@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Couldn't a moon city just recycle water the same way the International Space Station does?

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
12 points (92.9% liked)

Space

2628 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS