412

cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11349801

Archived version

...

The federal government of Canada will help to fund “a sovereign broadband backbone that connects Canadians from coast to coast to coast, with more direct and secure links to Europe and Asia,” Prime Minister Mark Carney announced.

A “broadband backbone” is the high-capacity core of the internet network that carries traffic between cities and countries. Speaking with reporters later, Mr. Carney said the backbone would also include connections to the Arctic.

...

Representatives for Canada’s major telecom companies supported Mr. Carney’s announcement .... As Mr. Carney’s government continues to seek alternatives to reduce dependence on the United States, calls have grown to develop more networking infrastructure that would avoid routing Canadian data through U.S. internet exchanges, thereby exposing that data to potential surveillance.

...

Researchers at the University of Toronto and York University studying the journey taken by data between two points in Canada have found that, among their data sets, about a quarter of those journeys routed through American interchanges, exposing that information to access by the U.S. National Security Agency.

...

Mr. Carney did not provide further details about the broadband project. However, discussions about the ownership and financing model for the project are currently being held between telecom companies and the Major Projects Office, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter.

...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 71 points 5 days ago
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

Goddamn he's on fire.

The madder Trump gets at Canada, the more sure we can be that we're moving in the right direction.

Then there's Little PP with the jelly spine who thinks we should play nice. I don't know how the fuck anyone supports him at this point. Basically "lay back and think of England". Pathetic.

[-] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Carney needs to stomp on the Moneris sale, or work with the EU to replace it. The US is already weaponizing payment systems against people they don't like (literally "don't like", not even folks with criminal accusations of any sort...)

[-] nickspacek@piefed.ca 30 points 5 days ago

Hopefully we can also get sovereign internet services to our entire population. Where I live in NB, 20 minutes outside the capital city, the options are: overloaded and poor reception to Xplore fixed wireless (which was sold to a US company is 2022), strangled and under-invested DSL circa 1995 from Bell, or Starlink.

[-] excursion22@piefed.ca 8 points 5 days ago

It's fascinating how different access can be in places where Robellus aren't the only options. I live in a town of 6000, 1+ hours away from any major centre and I get 1 gig fibre, all because of Sasktel.

It still amazes me how utilities can be privately owned. There's literally no benefit to it.

[-] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Get ready for your airport to be privately owned. If the this federal government could get rid of Saskfel they would.

[-] imvii@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

I'm across the water from you in PEI. Same thing. I've got Bell fibre at my company in town, but my home is hooped for Canadian based internet. We HAD to go with Starfink because it is literally our only option outside of 2 Mbps DSL which is impossible given we need to do video meetings.

Granted, my house is in the woods in the boonies, but still. I hate giving money to Starfink.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago

As an American, please do this, my government should not be in charge of the global internet

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Not be in charge of global anything you mean.

[-] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago
[-] derp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In terms of cross-country/continental communication, this provides a bit more context on the current dependencies Canada faces. This is a great move in the right direction.

https://www.submarinecablemap.com/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Awesome! Don’t a few undersea cables already route through Canada? That should make it easier!

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Courtesy @derp@dbzer0.com

https://www.submarinecablemap.com/

There are actually surprisingly few intercontinental submarine cables with an end-point in Canada and all of the ones to Europe go via Britain which, as shown by the Snowden Revelations, do bulk surveillance on everything going via the cables with end-points in Britain and pass that data to the US.

At first sight there seem to be only 2 "clean" submarine cables with end-points in Canada, one to Greenland and one to Japan.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

UBC has several big pipes, I'm sure there's some on the East Coast too

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago

Canada stepping up to fill the void the tea USA leaves would be so cool

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Who is going to take over iCANN and all the other American organizations in control of the internet.

[-] MasterOKhan@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We honestly could just make our own alternative to iCANN, no one says we have to use the same DNS root servers as everyone else, we could run our own. It’s time we stop making the internet so centralized, it really wasn’t supposed to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mHtt@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

also Canada needs nukes.

ITS LITERALLY THE ONLY THING AMERICA UNDERSTANDS.

[-] wampus@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So, I seem to recall that early in the trade dispute, the Ford government in Ontario ripped up a Starlink deal they'd been working on, making a big show about not giving them more leverage. The next week, Rogers inked a deal with Starlink to provide satellite peering/connections to their customers, and then the Ontario government could get that service through a "Canadian" telco.

Point being, I don't believe a word our government says when it comes to their intentions with regards to detangling from US tech oligarchs, especially when they're leaning on companies like Bell, Rogers and Telus, which are massively dependent on US tech oligarchs. They'll "build up" a "sovereign" internet setup, by outsourcing the work to either American companies directly, or to Canadian companies acting as proxies for American companies to spare some optics. Sorta like how "Telus" doen't actually have Canadian sovereign email, they just resell google or microsoft. Hell, Telus's VoIP product, "Business Connect", is just a rebrand of Ring Central. They literally point users to the Ring Central manuals, because our big rich hugely profitable mighty telco, can't even write/maintain their own branded documentation. Even routes through RC servers down south for most calls.

It's also likely worth highlighting that some of those big telcos, like Telus, have like $19.5 billion in long term debt, with a market cap of like $20 billion. There's talk of big overhauls being required for Telus, as it's become too outsourced/unfocused, and its debt's out of control. But hey, Carney just announced a government bailout! Yay, liberal hand outs to big business! Canada foots the bill for the infrastructure, the Telcos get the profits, and it sounds like they'll get to completely write off taxes for a while too.

As for people in this thread mentioning things like "Good the US shouldn't control the internet", I don't think they really grasp the state that Canada's internet is in. There are practically no east west data cables / redundancy around, we just use the US's backbone most of the time. Almost all of our software reaches south for updates / patches etc, as the US doesn't put any of those things into Canada, even on proxy boxes -- but also, it's way faster for a server in Vancouver to grab updates from Seattle, than it is to route data to the east coast. This is partly due to our country having crazy bad population distributions, with metropolitan areas like Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal each having more people than entire provinces such as Manitoba and Sask -- it's nearly impossible to justify huge infrastructure spends in communities of like 500-1000 people. At best, this is likely to fill that infrastructure gap a bit -- but it won't change our dependency on US tech in a more practical way.

It's been like 2 years+ of this shit, and we still can't get something like a fairphone through the regular telcos -- like 99% of cell phones in Canada are Google or Apple, totally entrenched in those ecosystems. That's how much the telcos care about Data Sovereignty/Canada.

[-] WasabiWabbit@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Not to mention we have very little, basically zero sovereign cloud compute.

[-] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Gotta build them data centers though! For the American tech fascists to use!

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

Cool, now fix internet and cell prices to match europe and asia. I do not give a shit where my encrypted traffic gets routed if it costs 5x as much as the rest of the world.

[-] ohshit604@lemmy.halstead.host 9 points 5 days ago

Skeptical ye ol Carney will achieve this in his current term, it’s a lot of work to do, and even if he does I suspect this will just be another tool to track Canadians.

[-] non_burglar@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Now this is finally getting to core problems with American dominance in tech.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As the PM of a member nation of the Five Eyes, I'm pretty sure he's keenly aware of the mass surveillance done on the Internet traffic of everybody (even of that from nations referred to as "allies") routed through nodes controlled by Five Eyes member nations and the uses of that info for industrial espionage and political interference.

When setting up his sovereign internet network might want to bypass the UK too, by the way, given that as the Snowden Revelations showed they were some of the worst at this and already back then used their control of the end-points of most Atlantic underwater cables connecting Europe to North America, to do massive amounts of surveillance on Internet traffic between Europe to North America and then gave tons of that info to the US.

Including Britain in this network would just be a two-step way of giving the info to the US rather than direct.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago

Given that we don't know exactly what they're building, how it will be financed, or who will own it, I guess we're all free to imagine that it will involve something other than just giving lots of money to the Canadian telecom cartel.

And three years ago, after the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission said it would require some large telecom companies to share access to their fibre networks with competitors ...

Three years! How much progress have they made since then in restoring competition to the market for home Internet service? Any at all? At a glance it looks like the rate for TPIA is still prohibitively high, leading to retail prices from Teksavvy — the only independent ISP I know of which still exists — which are roughly double what I'm currently paying through Bell's flanker brand. It's looking like the promised repair of the once-great system will never happen. Not under a Liberal government, anyway. It will continue to be left to rot. Go on Carney, prove me wrong.

Edit to add: Here is Teksavvy once again pointing out that the wholesale rates set by the CRTC, like the ones Bell was complaining about 3 years ago, are still higher than the retail prices charged by the dominant providers.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

I don't think it takes away from the value of what Carney is proposing here - kind of two very different problems really - but you're absolutely right that more competition in our telecoms sector is something we desperately need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iamthetot@piefed.ca 6 points 5 days ago

Big if true. Some pretty important details still need to be decided.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Excellent. gO Canada!

[-] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 3 points 5 days ago

👀 four eyes minus American five eyes 👀

Good deal.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

I'm all in favour of this, this is a way better boondoggle than Sovereign AI.

[-] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Lethamyr's UK ping is about to get better.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
412 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

12419 readers
656 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS