128
I'd prefer if she stayed away.
everyone would prefer if she stayed away. However the DNC is probably going to push her again as they consider her the 'safe' candidate who is not going to upset their donors or push any sort of real change like people want.
I.E. the candidate that will lose, but they can shrug their shouldres and go "but we twied"
load more comments
(1 replies)
Of course the democrats are stupid enough to bring Kamala Harris back into play.
Hey, shes still fresh off fucking up the last election. She still has plenty of get up and go for fucking up this one.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Please just go away already.
Fuck
load more comments
(15 replies)
Why? Does he want to lose?
load more comments
(7 replies)
So is she pretending to move left or is El Sayed going to make a pivot to the status quo?
Why would El-Syaed agree to such a thing.
From NBC:
Roxie Richner, a spokesperson for El-Sayed, told NBC News on Wednesday that “Abdul is thrilled to welcome Vice President Harris to Michigan for a conversation about improving Black maternal health and bringing down healthcare costs.”
Richner added: “He looks forward to hearing directly from Black women and healthcare providers and discussing how he’ll continue that work in the Senate. There’s no better choice for Michiganders than Abdul when it comes to making healthcare more affordable, and he’s grateful Vice President Harris will join him in spreading that message.”
Okay, that is actually on brand for him. Glad to see it isn't because of her foreign policy
I share your sentiment to a degree. However, Kamala remains popular with centrist liberal voters who are still sore she lost the 2024 election. Having her endorse El-Sayed on his campaign trail could entice voters who see him as “extreme.”
At this point, he needs every last vote he can conjure. It’s politics in 2026. Such is the state of a corrupt, two-party, winner-take-all electoral system.
load more comments
(54 replies)
Could she… not?
"Please forget about me throwing Gaza under the bus a couple of years ago. It's a two-party system!"
And, sadly, that's accurate. It pisses me off that there has been no accountability for this, but she is still head and shoulders above anything smelling like MAGA.
Kamala single handedly invaded Gaza and murdered babies with her bare hands.
Jesus christ MAGA isn't even the biggest threat to the left, it's the single issue leftists.
Are they doing that thing that parents do to try and get their kids to stop doing something by showing interest in it?
I guess Third Way is sending in their nuke.
She's going to run in 2028, isn't she? She's trying to ride his coattails.
I think this is one of those necessary evil type of things.
He's very vulnerable with centrists, because they suck and don't think blue no matter who applies to them, apaic is spending on Rogers, and the Democratic Jewish community is fundraising for his Republican opponent.
Like it or not, unity will be important to him if he wants to win and help enact progressive policies.
Plus if he's talking about black healthcare, to black women, she's as good as any right now outside of Jocelyn Elders.
Of course of she had any wits about her she'd use this setting to also apologize for her snub of the Muslim community.
Ooh. This is probably not a good idea. She's toxic as fuck.
load more comments
(3 replies)
El-Sayed needs black women to vote. Kamala is a poor substitute for Obama, but she'll do folks.
If you only invite your friends to the party, you limit the number of new friends you can make. Sometimes you invite that annoying guy with the hot sister.
🤮
Oh, FFS, I hope she doesn't run again. JFC.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
128 points (92.7% liked)
politics
31160 readers
1748 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS