Ohhh, so THIS was the "consensual besteality" 'ol googly-eyes Patel was referring to...
I am out of the loop here, but somehow not surprised.
The FBI quietly issued guidance this past spring lifting a categorical hiring ban on applicants who had previously engaged in prostitution, and said that it would instead consider the context of the behaviour in at least some cases. The bureau made a similar change regarding bestiality.
"We did not want to punish victims of bestiality, victims who were trafficked. We did not want to make it an automatic disqualification for the FBI to consider you,” Patel said.
If thay was what they meant they should have written about 'not excluding victims of' instead of 'consider the context'.
Thank you for the link!
If that was actually the intent they could have avoided all the drama by adding broader language to the entire document allowing exceptions on a case by case basis for prohibited behaviors which occurred while the applicant was a victim of trafficking and coercion. This sounds a lot more like an excuse made after the fact to defend an indefensible decision.
I really hope someone in congress follows up on this and demands to know how many agents were hired with these behaviors on their record, and of those how many had been identified as victims of trafficking. Make them go on record with it.
I'm skeptical about the phrasing "engaged in prostitution", I think the beastiality bit is a smokescreen to distract from that part. I don't think the fbi has had to turn down a lot of former hookers, I think they've had to turn down lot of men who have "engaged with prostitutes" from the other end of the transaction. They are removing this restriction so they can hire more sexual predators.
(inb4 "not all men who hire prostitutes are sexual predators". I know. I'm a sex worker. The ones Donald Trump and Kash Patel want to hire are going to be sexual predators).
Legitimately thanks for that. That had stood out to me as "one of these things is not like the others" but my mind only went to sex workers, I did not think at all about men who bought prostitutes.
Uhh...who exactly are the "victims" in a bestiality incident? 🤨
The israeli iof used dogs to rape palestinians.
I am willing to put money down that similar things happened on Epstein island, his texas (I think it was texas) ranch, and in a certain florida golf club
Often prostitutes who are only doing it to survive or women who are being trafficked.
Those women are not applying to be in the FBI though, which is why I doubt that is who Patel is claiming are being kept from becoming agents.
I'm turned on by authority so FBI Belle is kinda....
I'm just picturing her taking that knot like a champ.
She had no idea he was going to transform into a human -- she was 100% ready for beast form.
TO BE FAIR i don't think any of the characters are supposed to know about sex. Not because they're in a kids disney movie, but because they're medieval peasants
Where do you think medieval peasants came from? Just sprouted from the ground?
The queen, obviously.
Literally
I have a feeling that medieval peasants had a fairly good grasp of sex, seeing how they raised animals and all. They knew.
Plus wtf else were they supposed to do
They also didn't think birds had sex, so I don't put much stock in making the connection between humans and other animals. They probably didn't even see people as animals
Speaking monolithically
Animals and people are different !
In terms of what goes where and with what result, nah, not really.
Not really. We function pretty much the same.
They grew up in one room houses...
“Charlie close your eyes or forget going to see Wonka this weekend!”
I know this so don't worry. They are, however, perfect and innocent unicorns, as any good fantasy novel with dragons will tell you.
(Dam was really looking forward to taking that doggy dick out for a spin)
She wanted that Beast Cock
shes into the wild side.
I am ashamed that I understood what this means
Alternative interpretation:
This entire incident was a misguided, half-drunk attempt to make the FBI inclusive and welcoming for furries.
they looked at their IT department and decided they should have more of those kind of people
Exactly, they were like, "shit all the people who know how to actually make computers work hate our fucking guts, how do we seem more friendly to them?"
This feels like misdirection away from something else going on, but there's so many dumpster fires all going on at the same time, it's hard to say.
Maybe include that elon still wants to make catgirls but they do want them to have human rights so lable them as animals but then you have to worry about beastiality
"Human" catgirls would still be women and they're already attacking women's rights as it is. They would first need to overturn Bush II's ban on human-animal hybrids that promised better organ transplants.
Just fyi we hunt zooaphiles
Oh I know, but try to put yourself in the mindset of someone who is prevalent to making snap judgments based on aesthetics, who has never actually interacted with any furries, looking at the furry community from the outside.
There's that rabid furry hate. Lol
Just because he's called "beast" doesn't mean he can't consent. This is just furry.
Dogs aren't hot. Consent with a furry beast, however...
They wanted beast cock.
All jokes aside, this was probably necessary in order for Patel to be employed.
Belle kinda hot
Belle didn't mind a bit of rollplay to spice things up, but she was not impressed by Beast's suggestion of how she carry out her investigation. That wasn't standard issue equipment at all.
kash is into dogs, not MAGICAL BEASTS.
Kash has been in a happy relationship for 6 years now
dont let dogs near KRISTI noem.
i thought this was referring to how police marry immigrants despite voting against their rights
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
