Swedish teenager jailed for attempted murder, rape and assault committed online, with victims in Germany and Australia (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 days ago by Jonawan@lemmy.zip to c/world@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] rollin@piefed.social 28 points 3 days ago

The article seemed sparse on the details, so I googled it and here's the key details, taken from a couple of other articles I found:

The teenager was between 15 and 17 when the offences were committed

The Swedish case was also being watched for another reason: whether someone sitting behind a computer could be held responsible for violent crimes physically carried out by somebody else.

The court decided they could. Senior prosecutor Jenny Ostling said that finding could become important as authorities deal with similar cases.

The now-18-year-old is being convicted, among other things, of orchestrating a high-profile knife attack in the Stockholm suburb of Hässelby last year, when another young person within the 764 movement attacked an older man.

He has been jailed for more than 10 years for attempted murder, rape and other violent crimes despite carrying them out from behind a screen.

The 18-year-old, known publicly only as “Chai,” targeted young people online and pressured them into harming themselves and carrying out sexual acts.

Among his victims was a young person in Germany who was harmed so severely that they nearly died. He was also convicted of sexual and violent offences against a teenage girl in Australia.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

How do Swedish courts feel about this? I'm sure that in the US this would be overturned on appeal. While he might have caused the crimes to happen, he himself did not commit them. He committed extortion.

If there was a murder, a felony murder rule would mean he could be charged for that, but unless Sweden has laws covering more indirect crimes I don't know how this conviction would stand.

[-] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 3 points 3 days ago

Extortion explicitly makes you culpable.

[-] rollin@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

a felony murder rule would mean he could be charged for that

I'm by no means an expert, but there is also a more general legal principle of accomplice liability that could apply in such a case: "Accomplice liability is a legal doctrine that holds a person criminally responsible for a crime they did not directly commit but intentionally assisted, encouraged, or facilitated. This liability is often equal to that of the principal offender".

[-] emigu@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Apparently there are supreme court decisions on these types of sexual crimes from before (from what swedish public service says) that they used, and further claimed the same rulings should apply to violent crimes. I have no doubt this will be appealed though, and might also go to the supreme court for ruling.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

How do I read the article?

[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Don't tell The Guardian, but their block is very easy to bypass: open link in firefox, press reader view button. There you go.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

How do you commit violent crimes online?

[-] cyberfae@piefed.social 18 points 3 days ago

They extorted the victims and forced them to egage in sexual and violent acts

[-] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Extortion.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026

68 points (95.9% liked)

World News

58132 readers

1770 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.