In before courts rule that cops arent liable for following false "evidence", similar to how they arent liable to "protect and serve"
They clearly didn't even consider checking for an alibi. Didn't consider that the AI could be wrong.
Didn't even consider "has she ever been to the state?"
The only way we can stop this mass surveillance system building is by suing the ever-loving Christ out of these corporations in court and make it to financially stupid to put AI in charge of the surveillance state.
These greedy cretins oligarchs only speak in money, so you have to make their money the lesson.
We're kinda going to need a revolution for corporations to be held accountable.
France had it right. chop, chop
U.S. News
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.