What is the advantage of this over launching all from a big site in the us desert?
Having a chain of launch sites around the globe would enable downrange booster landings, which would require less propellant reserves than return-to-launch-site booster landings. The extra propellant could be used to launch heavier payloads.
I still don't see how this scheme is superior to a landing ship that can be anywhere on the ocean.
The superheavy has no landing legs, so it can't land on any old droneship. The only way to recover the booster to catch it with the chopsticks.
well, lol, there was never 'any old drone ship'.
come on, do you think it's just a dumb barge with nothing on it? no telemetry, no guidance systems, just a chunk of shit floating in the sea?
so build a gantry, put out some outriggers for stability and stick yo silly fuckin chopsticks on these.
this is nearly as silly as orbital data centers.
you think it’s just a dumb barge with nothing on it? no telemetry, no guidance systems, just a chunk of shit floating in the sea?
Definitely not just a "chunk of sh*t", but I'd wager it's significantly easier to position a flat metal surface downrange than it would be to do the same with a massive tower + chopsticks.
so build a gantry, put out some outriggers for stability and stick yo silly fuckin chopsticks on these
That was actually kind of the plan for the former oil rigs, Phobos and Deimos, though they were eventually sold off a couple of years later.
this is nearly as silly as orbital data centers
Well, this is !spaceflightmemes. Silliness is kind of how we roll here :)
"0-degree inclination orbits preferred"
SpaceflightMemes
A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.
Related communities for serious posts and discussion:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
FAQ: