195

A Republican California sheriff must return more than a half-million ballots he seized for an investigation into unfounded voting improprieties in a special election last year, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco in February seized approximately 650,000 ballots from a November 2025 special election on statewide congressional redistricting favorable to Democrats and pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom. The measure easily passed statewide, and won in Bianco’s county by roughly 80,000 votes.

The court called the ballots’ seizure “unlawful,” saying California law requires voted ballots to remain in the custody and control of election officials, even during a criminal investigation. Bianco must also “refrain from further handling of the ballots except as necessary to comply with our order,” the court said in an unanimous decision. Bianco did not immediately comment on the ruling.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Tomorrow we'll find out he accidentally used them as kindling in his fireplace.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 71 points 6 hours ago

So… was that the test run to see how long the ballots could be witheld before they actually get released?

Because that was half a million ballots last year, and he’s still got them.

Sounds an awful fucking lot like that was precisely the intent.

[-] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 9 points 6 hours ago

I doubt it

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco in February seized approximately 650,000 ballots from a November 2025 special election

It isn’t good or okay but seizing ballots after they’ve been counted, tallied and several months have gone by wouldn’t do much against the initiative would it?

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 hours ago

No, but they could be disappeared so that when the vote tally is changed after the fact, it can't be verified or recounted.

[-] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 9 points 6 hours ago

Sure, but a couple of months after? And if that was th le case it backfired because now there’s case law precedent that shows:

The Court has now made clear that this kind of defiance cannot stand, that the Attorney General has the authority to intervene when sheriffs take improper action, and that voted ballots belong in the custody of elections officials

And

Newsom on Saturday signed a bill that would prevent anyone from seizing ballots, as Bianco did.

Seems more like a MAGA targeted campaign stunt:

At the time of the ballots’ seizure, Bianco was one of two prominent Republicans running for governor in a crowded June primary. He did not advance to the general election and later announced plans to run for reelection as sheriff in 2028.

If it’s tried again in California it’ll be interesting to see if charges/penalties are applied.

[-] funkreddit@lemmy.zip 27 points 5 hours ago

What are his consequences?

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 2 hours ago

Not much yet, he isn't in contempt of court yet, but the laws have been changed in Cali specifically because of this so if they do it again then they're getting charges written up by the State Attorney General.

[-] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

A promotion likely...

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago
[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

It's always the ones you suspect the most?

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

What the hell, that's not just election interference, that's treason.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 hour ago

Well technically it didn't interfere with any elections, they were already counted and the election ended a month before he took them.

It just interferes with record keeping and if he shares the records then he violates the constitution and opens himself to lawsuits.

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

Ah Riverside, the asshole of California

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Makes orange county the taint, which tracks.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
195 points (99.5% liked)

News

39282 readers
1989 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS