264

A new poll shows Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico leading Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) by 5 points over a month before the November midterm elections.

The Texas Public Opinion Research (TPOR) poll released Friday showed Talarico with 49 percent support from voters and Paxton with 44 percent support, with 3 percent saying they are undecided. This new poll is the second in a monthly series of polling results released by TPOR. Last month's poll showed Talarico's ahead by 6 points, 48-42.

Independent voters favor Talarico by double digits, 58-26, with 5 percent who say they are undecided. Paxton holds the lead among white voters and voters 55 years and above. Talarico leads among Latino voters, Black voters, voters under 55, college-educated voters, men and women, the poll stated.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] funkreddit@lemmy.zip 97 points 3 days ago

Polls mean nothing!!!!! Get out and vote!!

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It is insane how inaccurate they have been this midterm.

I think it is the increase in voter participation.

https://uspollingdata.com/news/voter-registration-2026/

[-] funkreddit@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago

I think it’s all fake news for dems to get complacent. Just another dirty trick from the Rs

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

All of the polling institutions are pretty aligned this time around, so that kind of discredits the “fake news” argument. Too many independent sources are saying the same thing.

That said, polls are based on historical data. And polls might not do a good job of trying to account for the abnormal fuckery that has been happening this cycle. Off cycle gerrymandering, purges of democratic leaning voters, scares about mail-in voting, etc.

People shouldn’t assume this is a lock. People need to show up in high numbers.

[-] Sir_Gkar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

People also forget that most campaigns want to be able to claim they are ahead in the polls. Strong poll numbers can lead to the bandwagon effect, while trailing poll numbers can cause people to give up.

Too many people remember Hillary losing in 2016 but fail to consider the specific context of her being an unpopular candidate. Believing that your side is going to win isn't normally a reason to stay home, unless you have some objection to the turd sandwich your side nominated.

So be encouraged by good polls, don't be discouraged by bad polls, and then get off your and vote no matter what the polls say.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

IMHO, Clinton v Trump is also the perfect example of normies not understanding how statistics and probability works.

Trump had a nearly 30% chance of winning. That’s a legit possibility of winning. If powerball had a 30% chance of winning, everyone would be running to buy a ticket.

People saw Clinton at 70% and seemed to think that was a lock. 70% odd isn’t a 100% chance of winning. It’s 70%.

[-] starik@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

That was just the FiveThirtyEight model. Most other models had Clinton in the high 90’s.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Which was wild because a lot of the polls were Clinton around +4 with about a +/-4 margin.

I remember Silver shitting on those high 90’s models because they clearly weren’t baking in enough room for the margin of error.

[-] aproposnix@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

Only 5 points. Texans are fucking stupid.

[-] Pratai@piefed.ca 21 points 3 days ago

Vote as if this were conservative propaganda designed to make you stay home.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 days ago

If Texas goes blue this year, I’ll cream myself..

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 days ago

Let's be real, you're gonna cream yourself sometime this year regardless of how Texas votes.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

Perhaps. But it’s usually unrelated to Texas.

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Usually... 😏

[-] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago

If Texas goes red this year, he’ll become abstinent.

[-] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

Do it for lilypip

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 days ago

I have doubts that piss baby won't meddle in this election. People in Texas need to track their votes, if the state allows it.

[-] treesquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Not enough to feel remotely comfortable a little over a month out from the election.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

That's easily erased by a phone call from the crooknchief during Marshall's law.

[-] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Only 5 points? Wtf Texass.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Well within the margin of fuckery. Make it 15.

[-] T3xas@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Can only hope it stays that way.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Maybe he shouldn't have stolen that pen.

[-] RaoulDuke25@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I love how something that pales in comparison to his major corruption, is so effective.

[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It makes it “real” for people who will never have 17.5 rental properties, nor bank accounts with 7 digits, or maybe even a 401k.

But everyone knows what a slight that small tells you about someone’s character. Pretty genius angle

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I wouldn't even call it small. That pen was worth $1000 and would be classified as a felony in many states, although not Texas.

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

If Texas goes blue I’d actually consider moving there lol

[-] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just remember, California was a Republican stronghold until the 90s when it suddenly wasn’t.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

There are a lot of great things about Texas but politics ain't one of them.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I am absolutely wanting to believe. The Reckoning is far too long coming. And will never be adequate. But at least seeing those dumbasses ejected from Power after decades is still something. Now if only we can do the same with ours here in Missouri.

[-] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Only 5 points? WTF is wrong with Americans these days?

[-] starik@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

It’s Texas. If Talarico wins, he and Ted Cruz will be the state’s 2 senators.

Is there no hope for a progressive candidate to win?

[-] Nonprophet@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
264 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS