422

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/71145919

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Saudi Arabia is evil, but perhaps this is the only way to teach Americans the error of their ways

They will betray us

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I dunno, the only way they could seemingly betray paramount is to put watchable shows on it.

Last week on Muhammed's wives

[-] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Queer eye for the Sunni guy

[-] myyass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Will? Did auto-correct not fix it to have?

[-] FE80@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It's OK, the other 50.5% is owned by Israel.

[-] BrownSugarBits@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

is it truly any wonder why the u.s. is car pilled? our culture is being controlled by oil tycoons

[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 107 points 1 week ago

We're putting AMERICA First by giving the ARCHITECTS OF 9/11 CONTROL OF OUR NEWS!

-LITERALLY Republicans!

[-] blackshirt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

A transactions for the architects of 9/11 to the architects of 9/11, sweet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fonix232@fedia.io 90 points 1 week ago

Because of course nothing can go wrong with that.

[-] codydodd@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

On the one hand we could imagine them clamping down on riske material and promote islamicism, but to be real having lived in the gulf for many years they care more about money than anything else. So prepare for more neoliberal enshittification.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Saudi Arabia and UAE are absolutely not going to be promoting Islamism (Qatar is more complicated). Islamists are the biggest enemies of entrenched authoritarian regimes in most of the Middle East, so even ones with a veneer of religion are trying hard to gain legitimacy as secular nationalist dictators. For example remember that one story about the UAE being like "Britain harbors dangerous islamists? The translation here is "this foreign liberal democracy is harboring enemies of my authoritarian regime." If anything both of them (but probably not (Qatar) are already pushing for more bellicose US policy in the Middle East, because they're vassal regimed whose survival depends on the continued interest of their imperial masters.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] blackshirt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

At least no more Arabs as the bad guys in Hollywood, right? right?

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago

This has been going on for awhile. I’ve said it a few times. Saudi Arabia has been quietly buying up a ton of companies along with various Trump allies and sometimes outrighting funding those Trump ally companies.

They invest in many Trump related companies as well as partnering with Russia’s Soverign Weath Fund.

Everyone is so worried about China, they are letting Saudia Arabia buy up everything behind the scenes.

I would trust a government that kills reporters, hangs out with Epstein, or likely helped fund 9/11 terrorist attacks.

There’s a list of PIF investments in Wikipedia. PIF

[-] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

It is honestly pretty funny that they are currently incapable at protecting themselves even with top of the line equipment. They've also spent way too much money on completely useless megaprojects, failed to buy up large swaths of Arizona land for alfalfa, and haven't built any large internal industries to transition them away from their status as a petrostate aside from a few luxury electric car manufacturing plants.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Recommend Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948-1991 (Studies in War, Society, and the Military) by Pollack

There are many reasons; one of them is that Arab forces often lie to their commanders so that they have very poor situational awareness, leading to a cascade of further poor decisions in war.

This is because you can and will be executed for failure.

Unfortunately, you can also be executed for being too competent, which can be seen as threatening to your superiors.

Also, maintenance. And sand. I hate sand.

There are many other factors and exceptions, depending on when and where.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago

The Gulf States are (IMO) facing the problem that they need a way to stay relevant as oil (or their geopolitical position where they get to buy security with oil) becomes obsolete but putting large-scale productive capital in their countries is going to automatically empower the people manning, operating, supplying and otherwise getting actual production out of said capital (which is to say the bourgeoisie and the proletariat). For a petrostate largely run along aristocratic lines that's a problem, because the new economic forces created by this transition will demand a political voice and Saudi aristocrats absolutely don't want to give them that. Industrialization was (with some twists and turns) good for European countries, but look what it did to European nobility. This is also why they don't create an effective army; without a strong, popular civilian authority (which none of them have) nothing will stop it from seizing power. Their big problem here is that you can't modernize in half-measures; you have to go all-in or not because the first step will drag you the rest of the way, probably violently if you resist. Other third world dictators for the most part have this problem too, but while they are forced to deal with it today Gulf monarchies are buying time with oil so they get to deal with it tomorrow. Fundamentally their behavior makes more sense when you realize that they're trying to thread a needle through a hole that doesn't exist.

And that's enough Karl Marx for one day I think. Remember, the answer is always communism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 37 points 1 week ago

Why do people who complain about Muslims want to give our industries away to Islamic countries?

[-] boonhet@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

They only dislike Muslims who aren't billionaires.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

They dislike everyone but their own, but they still get hard-ons for billionaires.

[-] Master167@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Because there's money to be made by looking the other way. The "revolving door" is open to high level government bureaucrats and they want their payday after their "public service"

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Power is the only real religion.

[-] Tiral@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's like making billions of dollars changes your point of view. Weird.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

I’m so happy everything in the world is gonna be owned by 5 people and 2 countries.

They are going to run this into the ground. They have no idea how art works other than they want to buy the stuff people are watching.

[-] axus@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

MBS is Trump with more murder and less term limits

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago

*Fewer

Sorry had to do it.

[-] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

More murder only because we know about it! And only if you don't consider the people murdered by Trump's regime (like ICE murders and the Iranian school bombing).

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

I’m glad I cancelled paramount plus a while ago

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

I suggested boycotting them in a previous topic and got replied "whoa you want us to stop watching movies and tv??"

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Same. I'd like to cancel again though, to show them!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

America's most defining characteristic is selling out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bedwyr@piefed.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Where is reuters on this? This is right up their alley, I have to think the omission is on purpose as this is news.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DukeNukem@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Saudi Arabia also bought EA, which wasn't a great company to begin with.

[-] 13igtyme@startrek.website 1 points 6 days ago

Imagine if the didn't back out the Embracer deal when they were buying up all the indie companies. They could have rolled it all under EA and killed close to 40% of the market.

[-] teslekova@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Can't be worse than the Ellisons. Changes nothing.

[-] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 14 points 1 week ago

Sure it can't. Team Bonesaws And Islamist Petro-Monarchy can't possibly be worse.

[-] NEZ27@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Team Bonesaws is definitely worse than the Ellisons, but they're both in the Blight Against Humanity Hall of Fame.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reporting you did last week on us was kind of poor, we require you to update your passport and come visit us so we can discuss it all in person...

[-] cinoreus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lmao, wb agreement did make Ellison's go broke.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
422 points (99.8% liked)

World News

58397 readers
2308 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS