329

Apparently WD and Seagate stock have already taken a hit at the announcement.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Nice. I switched from WD to Toshiba in 2024

[-] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 hours ago

These numbers feel unreal. How long does zeroing a 65TB drive take?

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

would probably take like 2 to 3 days to write zeros across the entire disk. but hardware or software based full disk encryption can make 'erasing' a disk (make the data irretrievable) very fast.

[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

How computing a result from a ?4096?bits key for each byte goes faster than writing 0 for each byte?

[-] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

If the disk has built in encryption, so the storage controller on the disk handles the encrypt/decrypt cycle but presents as an unencrypted disk for all intents and purposes to the user. All thats needed to wipe the disk is to delete the encryption keys. Its a pretty common feature in enterprise disks and i quite like it. Saves a lot of time when decom time rolls arround

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 91 points 22 hours ago

I just want affordable storage again in the single digit TB drives, maybe low teens. I waited too long to build a multi drive nas and now I have regerts.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 32 points 19 hours ago

When my 4 TB drive died ~15 years ago I thought to myself I'd just wait a few months and replace it with 8 TB for the same price. Then the floods happened.

Then prices almost were finally at that level again. And then AI started gobbling everything up.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, 2TB SSDs are honestly fine for everything except bulk storage.

[-] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

From my perspective the older slower ssds are fine for bulk storage, you just can't get them. My ideal would be a 4-8TB SSD that is as cheap as an equivalent SSD, as marginally faster than a HDD

[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 140 points 1 day ago

Good that Toshiba saw the increase in demand as an opportunity to increase sales volume, rather than price gouge their customers. Hopefully they gain market share.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

sales volume

[-] boonhet@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

There's more competition in the storage market than RAM. Someone was going to do it, might as well be them.

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 41 points 22 hours ago

IDK, it's pretty risky. Doubling production means youre taking a bet that the bubble is not going to burst.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 53 points 20 hours ago

Hard disks will always have demand, we need more every day and they have a limited lifespan

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 13 points 18 hours ago

Great point, quintuple production!

[-] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 18 hours ago
[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

??? I thought it was a risk free investment! You got this!

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It may be risk-free, but you still need money to spend money. That's what the asshats called 'investors' are for.

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Should be an easy sell, someone on the internet found an infinite demand glitch!

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

I’m pretty behind what I want for drives, and modern dev practices of storing tons of intermediate container build artifacts, and a resurgence of arrrborists will probably soak up drive demand even if prices fall.

[-] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

That is a fair point, especially with things that are very hard to set production for like processors.

[-] limer@lemmy.ml 9 points 22 hours ago

Why not both ™ ?

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 21 points 19 hours ago

Toshiba are the real ones.

[-] Kjell@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

The good, more HDDs and bigger drives.
The bad, they will directly to data centers.

[-] RxBrad@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago

Straight to the datacenters. And once they get their five years out of them, straight into to the shredder.

Wouldn't want any normies getting their hands on them, and having ideas of not using whatever subscription cloud computer bullshit they've forced on us by then.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 18 points 20 hours ago

Consumers aren't buying large drives like this, those are intended for data centers. And if they're increasing production aimed at those capacities, that means smaller capacity stock opening up for consumers.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 day ago

I hope it alleviates the pressure. I need to upgrade the 4TB in my array, badly. It’s all on borrowed time.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 20 hours ago

I have 4x8tb drives that have way too many hours on them

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 15 hours ago

I don’t want to look. I think mine might be getting towards 10 years old.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I don't hoard video files, so 1TB still seems unimaginably vast. I was shocked when I learned my entire CD collection, ripped to FLAC, would fit on my phone. 100TB is like a billion dollars, my mind has difficulty understanding numbers that large.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 24 points 21 hours ago

You get games that are several hundred gigabytes these days - high resolution art assets are big.

Filling up a 1TB drive is easy. 100TB, yeah, that's a lot of space.

Don't count bytes, look at what they can store: 1TB will hold like four to eight recent AAA games.

[-] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 25 points 23 hours ago

Even if you do need 100 TB of storage, I feel like it'd be a lot better to have multiple smaller drives rather than one massive one. To be fair, though, I'd expect such large drives to be targeted mostly to commercial customers.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 24 points 23 hours ago

My 116TB pirate ship could use a few more 100TBs to keep afloat.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 5 points 21 hours ago

I'm in a smaller, but similar boat with my 40TB. A few of the drives are pretty old now, and i would prefer swapping them out before they die.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 22 hours ago

Large drives are convenient for 3 2 1 backup. Not all your storage needs or even should be ssd or raid 5.

[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 1 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, if get a few bad sectors suddenly you're spending most of a day backing things up.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 23 hours ago

You should've been backing things up already.

"If you have one, you have none".

Without proper backup your data is just waiting to disappear at the first unrecoverable failure.

[-] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

And it can be fairly invisible in day-day use with 4 drives set up in RAID5.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 9 points 21 hours ago

Really depends on what you store. If you archive videogames like i do, 100TB is a good place to be, and redundancy means you need more than one.

[-] scallisto@retrofed.com 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Larger storage is good for videos (think Blu-rays, 4K videos are very big! Security camera feeds could also take up lots of space), and you might also want to host for multiple users (for family, friends, or a business)

But yes, _100_TB is a lot. 8-24TB (before memory became super expensive) was reasonable for most consumers, usually in a RAID configuration for redundancy. Multiple smaller drives are more reliable and modular than a single big one!

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Without going into video media, I've got around 2-3TB of photos (in RAW format) and my ripped/downloaded music collection is about the same size. Probably got about 5TB of device backups and a similar amount of retro games ROMs/disk images

I think between my desktop PC and server I've got about 70-80TB of storage (though not all of it is usable for redundancy)

I could see myself building a new NAS in a couple of years that would make use of a few of those drives if the economics work out

[-] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I've had good reliability from Toshiba in the past few years. I hope they can keep it up.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
329 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

15567 readers
1064 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS