122
Native Linux is coming to our phones much more easily (Xiaomi Mi Max 2) (lemmy.nz)
submitted 8 hours ago by sv1sjp@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AI can speed up a lot of the manual labour needed to bring even an almost dead, 10-year-old device back to life. My Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (oxygen, MSM8953) was dead. With AI help and my own knowledge, I ported/rewrote the missing drivers, and it now runs Nura (postmarketOS) with working camera, torch, SIM, phone calls and SMS. Only the loudspeaker is still broken.

Everything is up for anyone who wants to install it, or to understand the changes and manually write the patches for mainline: https://github.com/sv1sjp/mi-max2-oxygen-msm8953-nura-drivers Testing, feedback and PRs welcome.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] myusername@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Good work !

[-] erebion@news.erebion.eu 21 points 6 hours ago

"AI" can also speed up the process of making a code base buggy and hard to debug, when the people that generated it do not understand the code.

Nura will not accept generated patches, by the way. It might run your own version of Nura, but will not run upstream Nura with your patches.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

On one hand you don't know what the code is doing but on the other hand it's impossible to write so much code by hand and do any amount of testing for projects this big

LLM code is getting less sloppy and you now have the choice between generating open-source projects which you will never read the code of, or using an artisan coded buggy project.

Nobody has the time to test every single communication protocol manually to see when a camera is able to take pictures or a microphone records audio. LLM's can do this driver development and even check when the result looks good. There's soooo much tedious labour which can already be automated.

OP managed to revive an abandoned phone with working drivers thanks to LLM development. That's a massive win.

[-] liberatedGuy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

LLM code is getting less sloppy and you now have the choice between generating open-source projects which you will never read the code of, or using an artisan coded buggy project.

If nobody understands the code, then I might as well use proprietary software, at least somebody will understand that code.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Too bad Android is locked down and the android versions on these devices don't support a lot of modern apps.

You can use Nura (PostMarketsOS) and have the LLM write the hardware drivers for your own phone which are missing from the project. This is often a pretty custom for most phones. Once you get the drivers you can use the rest of the OS like normal.

You can now revive obsolete devices and get them useable. There's probably some slop in there but the slop is really getting a lot better it would be great if people were more accepting for using LLM's for extremely labour intensive tedious tasks which nobody would else do anyways.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 13 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, I personally prefer the bug-free old version:

On a more serious note, we're still in a period where people are figuring out what AI can/cannot be used for and what the best practices are. Ironically, since it's better at reverse engineering and bug hunting than developing when compared to a human, it is more useful for hacker and open-source projects than enterprise.

[-] erebion@news.erebion.eu 0 points 4 hours ago

Well, we know the best practices for the Nura project:

We forbid the use of generative AI tools in Nura.

It's literally the first sentence of their policy.

since it’s better at reverse engineering and bug hunting than developing when compared to a human

Citation needed.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It’s literally the first sentence of their policy.

Yes, but what about the 2nd sentence?

The following is not allowed in Nura:

  • Submitting contributions fully or in part created by generative AI tools to Nura.
  • Recommending generative AI tools to other community members for solving problems in the Nura space.

As you can see, it says nothing about researching, troubleshooting, reverse-engineering, etc. As long as you write and understand the code yourself AI is allowed for everything else. As long as you're not using generative AI it's fine.

Citation needed.

My personal experience working with AI over the past year. And if that's not enough, here's also Linus Torvalds himself.

The arguments regarding resource use and profiting off of theft are valid. The arguments regarding the nature and capabilities of the tech are not. Developers ARE responsible for the code they submit, regardless of how it was created.

[-] erebion@news.erebion.eu 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's not a good tool for research, it will just generate a hallucination and you end up doing something which does not work or just works somehow, but is not done correctly and will break in the future.

I talked to quite a few people recently at the postmarketOS and Alpine Linux conference, it definitely was noticed that more contributions are now coming in that do things wrong or in a subtly broken way and the submitting people have no clue.

If you rely on a lying computer for research, then your code will lie to you.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I rely on it to scour the docs, the forums, the codebases for any and all potential solutions and neatly present them to me. I then validate and evaluate myself. Just going with the first thing the AI suggests is lunacy and is exactly what I meant by "people are still discovering best practices".

[-] erebion@news.erebion.eu 0 points 1 hour ago

Or just use Ecosia or DuckDuckGo.

A search engine find you places to look at and doesn't hallucinate incorrect details.

I know it's perfectly possible to do mainlining of a device and work on the kernel stuff simply by reading stuff, asking people and bouncing ideas while strengthening the community in the process and having fun with other phone hackers.

[-] sv1sjp@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

Υes good luck finding solutions with closed source drivers by using only Search Engines and not at the end of the day...reverse engineering... I mean, technically feasible, but I cannot understand why we skip the HUGE AMOUNTS OF TIME that this kind of work needs to be done. And expertise.

The repository is here with an auto-installer script for anyone interested, the research is here for anyone to study and try to manually implement them to main-line. That's the beauty of open source.

All in all, The device is alive again, so I would need to consume less new electronic devices in the feature so I will protect more the planet with not needing a new phone/smallserver than some data centers that I do not control!

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

Unless you're doing something extremely common with well-established patterns, search engines have sucked for the past 14 years and been unusable for the past 8. For most of that time I would just refer to official docs, and official code examples, avoiding stackoverflow and other forums since they were just filled with outdated or plain bad info.

Search engines like Kagi might still be decent, but they are few.

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

What a genuinely antithetical stance to take on a project meant to keep otherwise dying hardware alive, but that's the beauty of open source. You don't have to give a damn about upstream, just fork and rebase into your own little niche and move on.

[-] lenni@news.erebion.eu 7 points 3 hours ago

You should read the reasoning for the AI policy that explains very well why the use of LLMs is the actually unethical thing here: https://docs.nura.eco/policies-and-processes/development/ai-policy.html#reasoning This thread by Casey goes more into the impact that allowing LLM usage would in her opinion have on the community/project: https://social.treehouse.systems/@cas/117347732017118902

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

The reasons stated are not immediate granted fact, nor are they all logical. Again, fork it and move on. Nura can have whatever policy they'd like, but it doesn't make sense not to use a tool, that it should be obvious by now can accomplish the prototyping work of entire engineering teams. In a good enough fashion to create software for revitalizing what would otherwise be ewaste. To me that doesn't sit well with their goals, at least as applied to this reality. You can have whatever opinion on it you'd like, I know there's a cult of anti ai on lemmy and in open source software, and I do sympathize with some of their viewpoints and the legitimate concerns.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Can ai get past the AT&T fuckery on my galaxy s5 active?

[-] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

HUZZAH!!!!

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
122 points (89.1% liked)

Linux

67960 readers
432 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r