...Huh... I didnt even think about the reality that allowing non-males the right to divorce actually decreased the abuse and homicide rates that those non-males faced against males until I saw this video. But it makes complete sense. We cann all easily pull out like 5 different true crime videos right now that show when a 'husband' (if you can even call those manchildren that) where they were embittered cause of some tiny , almost meaningless thing that their spouse of children did in which they end up beating up and threatening to prevent testimony from their spouse or children. Or sometimes both! ...

R.I.P and condolences to all those affected by male violence l throughout the centuries. 🥺🫂

#JustConservativeThings

Whenever I hear one of these tech bro oligarchs say something like this, all I can think is "What did your parents do to you?" Like, what broke you? Why aren't you in therapy? Straighten your shit out and become a decent human.

That's absolutely fucked

These tech-bro white supremacists are determined to reduce women to walking incubators

That this can be said out aloud in america without this guy becoming an INSTANT social pariah is just... your country is sick.

Proof he's never satisfied a woman. Oxytocin is released after orgasm.

Barely disguised fetish

The conservative brain now demands legal roofies to rape men, women, and children at will as their gods intended. Release the papers.

Some fucking abusive asshole husband out there is doing this right now. I'm sure of it.

Though you probably can't dose someone orally

Ok, I had a couple of coffees and am choosing violence this morning.

Slavery was just a fact of economy for most of human history. Then Americans got a hold of it for a century and the world, pretty much collectively, said: that's fucked up, we should stop this.

America, faced with European armadas, decided not to import humans, but to make their own. Thus was born the rape based economy of the Southern slaves states. The plantations were actually able to increase the number of enslaved persons by no small margin.

As the Northern states. Industrialized and fostered a religious"middle class", this idea became more and more unpalatable. However, this was also eugenics and justification of slavery times. The church represented the progressive arm of politics at the time as it wasn't hindered by the economy. A brave few freed slaves had a lot to do with that as like was able to recognize like.

However there wasn't a mercy for African Americans that drove the general distaste of slavery, it was the economy of rape that made it so odious to Mr and Mrs Joe America who may or may not have had opportunities to interact with a segregated population, but generally could read.

Compromises eventually broke down via a fear of western states falling into slavery and the degredation of morals would destroy the country. This occurred in the backdrop of ethnic cleansing the native population. This was not a racially enlightened population, but a people, and economy, now motivated by family values.

Enter in the Civil war to put the kibosh on the progression of the institution of rape-slavery. Some of the enslaved populations were able to leverage uprising and the emancipation was sort of the only next logical step.

Reconstruction wasn't super successful and the slavery class was able to sink into the shadows, but still remain at the wheel. The culture of rape had already taken hold and was able to creep around immigration via racism and segregation became the new battle cry.

This is where a lot of prejudice against the South comes from. Think incest jokes, child bride, shotgun marriage, and wife beating general "family values" related criticism.

This economic power struggle leads right through prohibition and the enfranchising of women, marriage equality, feminism and is culminating in the anti-trans pedophilia fuelled fervor of the day.

Palmer Luckey should be doped with laxatives. Every single day.

I'm a dude, but if wasn't, carrying a child and giving birth would be on the absolute top of my "shit I will never fucking do" list.

"Sociopathic Autistic Mega Virgin wishes women liked him"

So I'm reading After Nations now and the author describes how the first nation states didn't recognize women as proper citizens and denied them voting rights because the agrarian economy and colonialism required high birthrates. Those states consciously delegated women to just giving birth because that was what the current system required. After industrial revolution the state had better use for women as workers, consumers and taxpayers so it was possible to grant them more rights and allow them not to have kids. Now it looks like people in power want to go back to the old ways but not because the state needs it. It's just their racist, sexist, psychopathic believes. Crazy stuff.

A lot of people who get divorced still love their partner but understand their partner is not a good or healthy person for them to be with. “Love” is in fact not all you need.

I’d take a free oxytocin prescription if there was such a thing; it sounds funky. But I’m also a lesbian.

In the game Death Stranding, the remaining population of what was called the United States had to move underground following an apocalypse which devastated the entire world. Many, many people became depressed. A single suicide could destroy an entire city in an antimatter, nuclear-bomb-sized explosion, so oxytocin is delivered regularly to help people from killing themselves or others.

Sometimes, I wish I could have more oxytocin for myself.

Department of Redundancy Department — Right-wing Tech-bro

Oxytocin, the new fluoride. They will add it to the water supply to make compliant women with rotting teeth since they will remove the fluoride.

Cuck fetish

I tried to find more information about her claim about divorce and female homicide rates. Over that time period, male homicide also dropped considerably. I am wondering how she knows that there's a causational relationship with divorce and not other factors?

Welcome to Giliad.

"Yes I met my wife on Skid Row why do you ask"

Unless she demonstrates an absolute need for humanity that we make more kids, there would be no reason to set a protocol to reach that aim.

Also, intoxicating people in order to reduce their freedom and force a given behaviour up to them is quite a thing. It is usually accepted as a justice decision for some dangerous offenders, but the classical moral stand on it is to accept it when there are no better available solution ; as a lesser evil.

But so doing evil on half human beings to try to reach a non needed aim? I am quite sure we can find a better use of the ressources we still have...