281
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 56 points 4 days ago
[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

"Is it"?

Proofreading is dead.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

should have used AI.... tsk tsk

/s

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

What a mistake-a to make-a. :(

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Good moaning!

[-] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

A-Mario, is that-a you?!

[-] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

it's almost like there should be dedicated modules for each purpose, rather than the GPU being the one-stop-shop for high-demand computing.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

I don't understand. The GPU was created as a dedicated module. It just happened that the parallel tasks needed for rendering games could be used first for crypto and later LLM's.

The problem is factory capacity. It doesn't matter how you divide up the components based on purpose if one company prepays all factories to only make components for themselves.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today -3 points 3 days ago

Specialized AI chips are coming.... AIUs lol or SIUs (is you're stupid as F)

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

That's even worse. It means there will be no left over GPUs for gaming. Factories will produce AI specific chips and nothing else because gamers won't pay $10k for a GPU card.

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

NPU are kinda useless

[-] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 51 points 4 days ago

Lmao calling it a "crisis" like it's some natural phenomenon and not just ten assholes hoarding everything.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 39 points 4 days ago

I looked at HDD prices last week for the first time in a few months. It legitimately fucked up my mental state for a few hours. They were charging the same for 2tb that I paid for 8 last time I bought them.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Its an incentive for me to only take good photos and delete photos I don't like.

[-] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago

$200 for 8TB back in 2022

$545 for the same damn drive now.

I'm actually glad I went a little crazy buying storage back then, sitting on 40TB locally, but I recoil at the thought of replacing any of them.

[-] valkyre09@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Friend of mine has an ssd fail. Amazon refused to replace and instead gave him a a refund. He only got half of what it now costs back. Insane.

[-] qaeta@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

That itself should be fucking illegal tbh.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm pretty sure $15/TB for HDDs was considered the standard not too many years ago

Edit: the last time I bought an HDD (2023) it was 20 TB for $280, so $14/TB.

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Before the world firmly settled in the bad place, deals multiple times a year put shuckable external drives at $10/TB. I have a few left and am just hoping I don't run out before Pop+2 years, which is probably how long it'll take to make drives anywhere near affordable.

[-] amgine@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I had to decom a bunch of hardware for work last year. I decided the well-used but not bad enterprise storage needed to come home with me. Sitting on 40tb of spinning disk and 15tb of flash (in raidz2) with spares. Only worry I have is my parity drive is a 12tb and larger than the rest.

[-] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I went crazy buying storage and other products before the US president took office because of tariff threats.

There was a short period when AI led to minimum ram offerings increasing like the MacMini going from 8 gigs to 16 gigs. That was shortlived as AI vacuumed up all the ram and storage.

[-] Ertain@feddit.online 2 points 3 days ago

I sort of know the feeling. I got some good memory and storage a few years ago.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I seriously doubt the can confortably control that bias.

It's the memory crisis AND the massive fucking layoffs in the tech sector who actually buy fucktons of pc's/

[-] myyass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Aside from popular headlines; I think people are realizing they don't need the latest hardware to do tasks or play video games.

[-] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

AI won't just kill you-- it'll make sure you're broke for a while first

[-] Damage@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 days ago

Thing is, I'd like to never buy memory from these three asshole companies ever again, but right now it looks like that's an impossible proposition.

[-] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Imagine just throwing away your consumers like their trash.

What a business model...

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's the thing. We aren't their consumers. 70% of memory right now is going straight to AI. 30% is to normal people

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Raspberry Pi foundation looks wistful

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

Who ever would have seen that coming? It's almost like the poor decisions of dickheads made an important commodity prohibitively expensive.

[-] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

These aren't mistakes. They want to sell you shitty tablets and stream your computer to you for a monthly subscription. That's the endgame.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

I was referring to the mistake of the heavy investment into 'AI'.

[-] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

It isn't a mistake; it's the excuse to consolidate and take the monopoly on compute power.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, I know it's on purpose, but doing something stupid without it being an accident doesn't make it not a mistake for everyone else involved.

[-] schwim@piefed.zip 6 points 4 days ago

I've got to say I do enjoy reading about the billionaire overlords eating their own in their pursuit to find profitability.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

eventually there will be infighting.

[-] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

infighting or... tenderizing

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Thanks captain obvious.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Off topic, but about the article: Are the articles getting shorter and shorter? The rest of the page has more content than the entire article body. I've seen some longer Lemmy replies. :D

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago

I, for one, am happy to see an article where they simply get to the point and don't unnecessarily fluff the word count.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I just wish the posts were not bloated otherwise too. Edit: But fair enough and good point. At least its to the point, which is definitely a plus point.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Off topic as it is not gaming related:

I figured this was coming so I bought four System76 Meerkats with AMD processors, 4TB nvmes and 96GB of RAM. Each actively runs six to seven Win 11 VMs on ProxmoxVE, with many more on standby (each VM takes 128gb of disk space). Each VM runs large chunks of the client workloads that caused us to have to constantly upgrade our laptops. Now, by offloading the majority of the workload to these self-hosted virtual desktops (VDIs), we can extended the life of our "daily drivers" by years. My main PC is a 2019 Thinkpad andnat this rate, I might easily get another five years out of it (barring hardware failure). When we do need to replace, we no longer have to buy laptops with top tier specs.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 days ago

A lot of the DIY PC market is already under pressure. I worry that this will further strain the component makers (like cases and power supplies and such) and builders.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

Hmm. The Ars Technica article from earlier wasn't willing to lay the blame so wholly on memory prices. I wonder why this publication is.

[-] SpikedIguana@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Year over year. Okay

Last quarter... What

[-] thatOneGuy@aussie.zone 10 points 3 days ago

Q3 2026 sales were 20% lower than Q3 2025 sales .

[-] SpikedIguana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Just a bizarre way to phrase it then

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 days ago

Not due to "Windows 11" forcing users to buy new hardware if they want to continue their windows experience? I think a lot of the old "Windows 10" computers are now Linux machines. But you're saying it's because the tech bros billionaires are artificially creating demand for RAM? Okay then.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
281 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

15659 readers
1495 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS