72

Genuinely can't believe this mate of mine. Either he is blissfully ignorant or has been living under a rock.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

And this "Only Fans" you speak of, Naked pictures of people on the internet? Fascinating. mf doth protest too much.

[-] groet@feddit.org 13 points 11 hours ago
  1. They knew who she is. they just clarified to avoid confusion.
  2. We associate things by contexts. If you were talking about history or civil rights, your mate would most likely have confidently known who Rosa Parks is.
  3. https://xkcd.com/1053/
  4. When confronted or put under pressure we tend to question everything. You think the name is funny. He doesn't. So obviousltly his understanding must be wrong. Its not "civil rights" + "porn", there must be something else he is missing. It can't be the obvious thing he is thinking about because that isn't funny ...
[-] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club -4 points 6 hours ago

The civil rights movement, segregation, Rosa Parks are all things that are often taught on the UK school curriculum, well they used to be, not sure about the last 25 years. A 40 year old person who has even a modicum of historical intelligence should know who Rosa Parks is (and by extension) everyone should really. There shouldn't be any questioning it. Also, if someone was unsure I'm certain 5 seconds searching it would help them.

There are some things people SHOULD absolutely know. To not is just ignorance and in this case, part of the problem. Its like we are giving excuses to people for lack of knowledge. Sorry, that may seem harsh, but its the way I feel.

[-] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not a lack of knowledge mate, your friend was giving you the benefit of a doubt that you didn't find "Rosa Park's OnlyFans" so funny that you messaged him about it. As you've said, she's a civil rights icon, so it's pretty reductive to make a porn joke about her, especially when that... doesn't really riff off anything specific about her. If it was at least a joke about "Harriet Tubman getting railed" (which would still be in poor taste) or something, you could call it dark humour, but the joke you shared is essentially "hehe girl nekkid" targeted at Rosa Parks. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if the person who had that username was a racist and being dismissive of Rosa Parks intentionally. Probably not, I know how multiplayer lobbies can be, but it's not a good look regardless.

He clearly knew who she was, he told you when he asked for clarification, and the timestamps suggest he didn't have to look it up either. To be overly blunt, you don't look the brightest that you're so confident he's an idiot for giving you the benefit of a doubt, when if you'd given him the benefit of a doubt, you wouldn't be publicly embarrassing yourself trying to shame your friend. I'd assume that's the cause of nearly every downvote you've received on this post.

[-] KarfiolosHus@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 18 hours ago

After hitting up the wiki/reading the comments, I still don't get the joke/issue. What am I looking at here?

[-] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club -3 points 11 hours ago

There is no joke, its that my friend wasnt sure who Rosa Parks was and what Only Fans is. I can forgive not knowing what Only Fans is, but everyone should know who Rosa Parks is.

[-] crandall@lemmy.today 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

But he did know who she is

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

Maybe he's just not confident in his own knowledge, and the context of talking about an OnlyFans convinced him that he'd misremembered the name.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 9 points 17 hours ago

Or he's using the gray-rock technique to confront pretty blatant misogyny.

[-] Venator 3 points 14 hours ago
[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, would this joke have worked as Malcolm X's Only Fans? Would anybody have bothered to message a friend to share that Warpigs username? There's no connection to what Parks is known for, no parody or subversion of expectations, other than the transgression of presenting a respected, famous person as a low-status sex worker. And it only works for a woman.

(OTOH, Henry Kissinger's Only Fans might work based on the incongruity of anybody thinking of such a ghoul in a sexual context.)

[-] stefenauris@pawb.social 13 points 21 hours ago

Some people are just dense

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -3 points 21 hours ago

Most people are self-centered (which makes sense... to a point), & often don't much care about things that don't directly affect them - it's just the degree to which they are like this that varies. Now you know just how bad your "mate" is in that regard.

[-] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 19 points 20 hours ago

Not understanding a joke and not being sure about only fans are not traits i would describe as self centered. Sex jokes about historical figures may be funny if your are into that humour but if you have never encountered it yet they are quite strange.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

Like this one:

You’re just about as useless as JPEGs to Helen Keller
It's all about the Pentiums!
...

[-] toofpic@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

So if I'm a history buff and a nice person, I have to laugh at "Rosa Parks' OnlyFans" because hah she totally suck dicks? Or what? I still don't get the joke, it's just that bad.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
72 points (76.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42443 readers
4824 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS