Id be worried they tried to bug her place as well
We are all already bugged.
Sure but at least I know the bugs. I throw my phone in the closet and unplug the Ethernet cable. My car is stupid so no problem there.
Your TV is always listening.
I don't have a TV newer than 04 anywhere near me ans none of them are plugged in.
If they really want you can detect audio through walls and window vibration and some keyboard and computer activity from power line.
I'm aware but there are still ways to if not counter then dilute the ability for said connection, thick enough curtains for example or even a battery powered surge protector for example. But rarely are such things needed, you've basically got to get to Soviet vs US levels of bullshit spycraft to do that. Mind you Ilhan Omar should probably be factoring that in but it's probably not priority.
I'm worried that this is just them testing how far they can go.
January really worries me.
They know that if they lose power in 2029, they are all going to prison. Possibly worse, for some. So they can't allow an election in 2028. In order to do that, they will have to employ serious violence against the American people.
They will either crush us, or they will be crushed. MAGA understands this far better than Democrats, and they are prepared to do whatever it takes.
Going to prison... Ha ha fat chance that will happen. We all hope that will happen but I feel like that is a pipe dream in this country. There won't be any accountability or consequences for these people. Love your optimism though.
As the others have said…who’s gunna put them in prison? If people actually get out there and vote progressive then MAYBE, but as it stands the GOP is just chasing power for the power, that’s all.
Trump is literally guilty of dozens of felonies and a judge said “yea but he wants to hold the highest office in the land so I’m gunna let him go.”
Nah, the democrats will come out with some shit about how they're not going to prosecute anyone from the previous administration in the name of reconciliation and bringing the country together, or some such bullshit. Wouldn't be the first time.
Conservatives need to be removed from our country. Every. Single. One.
MAGA is a Domestic Terrorist Organization (by their own admission), and a serious, ongoing, enthusiastic National Security Threat, with a record of violence and treason. As such, they can be prohibited from existing without violating the 1st Amendment.
Further, those who participated in the January 6 Insurrection, are prohibited from holding office per the 14th Amendment/Section 3. That would include anyone who has ever claimed the 2020 election was stolen, since that was the premise of the Insurrection.
Therefore, all those MAGA elected officials must resign their posts, and they can't be replaced by anyone who has ever shown loyalty to MAGA. A new conservative movent will have to begin, one without any connection to MAGA or the Insurrection, and a strong party commitment to avoid MAGA tenets. Good luck with that. We will be busy for the next half century, forcing the right to behave themselves like actual citizens, instead of pirates.
I like the cut of your logic! This is exactly 100% what I expect from a progressive administration who wants to fix this shit.
It would REALLY behoove the citizens that we reminds them that liberals have weapons too, we need more Panthers standing around casually and armed.
I am guessing that she would end up living in NYC or California, strongholds against the MAGA menace. That way, when the straw finally shatters the camel's back, Omar will be able to continue being a leader. If she stayed in neutral or unfriendly territory, she could be captured or worse.
We know what ICE does to little girls and women in their "care". There is no question what they would do to her, if given the opportunity.
Here's hoping that Omar will be the Winston Churchill of our time, in the best ways.
She can't represent her constituents if she doesn't live in Minnesota. It is a stronghold of people just like her, that is why they vote her in.
She is a leader and will continue to be one but she can't be a Winston Churchill because she can't be president that can be a good thing though, a president with good ideas only stays two terms if they are lucky. She could be a senator one day and keep in power for as long as terms limits allow. Term limits she would impose on all senators and congresspeople as they should.
No longer feels safe in her own home or her country.
Probably a good idea also because I wouldn't trust any longer that the DHS or FBI wouldn't plant listening devices during the raid, based on some unconstitutional legal theory in a memo written by a first year MAGA law student using ChatGPT.
I would definitely trust that the will have planted listening devices, or other mechanisms for collecting data.
A big chunk of this administration openly worships Richard Nixon and they're not terribly creative, of course they're planting listening devices everywhere
Yep, and if watching "doge" was any indication, the younger and the dumber and the less qualified and less experienced the person, the more authority they will give them.
Also once a trumplet gets inside, the effluvia is impossible to expunge.
That is especially important for any ladies reading this.
I mean that was the point. It was obviously for intimidation and it worked. So... Mission accomplished....
That was only one of the goals. They really do want to find a way to arrest or deport her.
Technically I think the rules say that if you make the tiniest error it could invalidate it. The SCOTUS rulings don't say that but if sent to them now they could change that. That's usually based on discretion and a judges opinion, why having fascist toadies in all the steps is a big deal. There's multiple steps with different judges having opportunity to pause it, so this probably won't happen. But it's enough to wreck a regular person's life even without final denaturalization.
Not just her. It starts with the immigrants...
Sure but in this case the goal is attacking his enemies and the deporting thing is just seen as an easy approach.
Which is easy partly because they've proven there is almost no pushback to them pursuing it recklessly
I would worry they bugged my home if I was her. I'm not sure the move is over intimidation, but lack of trust/security in the current place.
Yup, this current administration would 100% take a page out of Nixon’s playbook and plant listening devices everywhere.
Why not both?
I don’t see how it’s not intimidation as a main point. She was granted citizenship at 17. Even if we suppose the claims true, she was not an adult: any mistakes would be on her parents
I mean, the assault on her citizenship is an intimidation tactic, I'm just saying her moving isn't necessarily her giving into the intimidation. It doesn't sound like shes backing down from the fight in any meaningful way, so moving seems more about control than anything else.
They're trying to argue that her father (deceased) committed immigration fraud by misstating her age, making his citizenship invalid, and therefore hers also, as it resulted from his fraud. It's an absolutely idiotic argument for many reasons, and would never stand up in court, which leaves intimidation as the main point.
Right, she shouldve stayed and remained in fear of her home being invaded again. Or firebombed by brainwashed MAGA cunts.
Get Dubya back on that aircraft carrier!
What even would a search be good for? Lets just play with the scenario here, and assume they have good intentions. They don't, but now we're in make-believe-land for a second. The dipsshits think she did something wrong years ago filing paperwork wrong or whatever the excuse is. Who would keep the proof of their wrongdoings for years afterwards? "I better save these documents forever, that could undeniably get me deported due to my wrongdoings".
Even under the most generous of circumstances, raiding her home makes no sense.
I think it's worse than that. She immigrated to the USA at 12 and naturalized at 17. She doesn't have any reason to be searched under the pre-tenses they've given. She was a minor when she immigrated and a minor when she was naturalized.
They want to: 1) Intimidate her and 2) Find some unrelated "gotcha" to remove her from Congress.
LegalEagle has a pretty good video about the charges. They are batshit. https://youtu.be/3zVpaHS6YD8
They are currently looking into such a gotcha. One of the avenues is that they want to find some sort of criminal conspiracy in her father's status, revoke it posthumasly, then strip her citizenship over a technicality.
Then she’s not eligible for congress again until she’s been a citizen for 7 years. Assuming they don’t immediately send her to some unrelated country the minute it’s been stripped.
I hope the Dems win, and have the balls to actually stop this shit. Or we’re all even more fucked than now.
They have been sending innocent people to foreign hellhole prisons....
Oh right, the guilty ones just get meaningless titles or at least pardons.
The conspiracy theory is that she was 18 when her father was naturalized and he lied about her age. He claimed she was 17 so she would also get citizenship. If they can prove she was 18 she would lose her citizenship. My guess is they were looking for some birth certificate or other documents that would show her "true" age.
It makes no sense because they don't have good intentions. If you assume they have bad intentions, then the search is obviously part of their method of intimidation and harassment of a political opponent and makes perfect sense from their twisted and disgusting perspective.
Lets just play with the scenario here, and assume they have good intentions. They don’t, but now we’re in make-believe-land for a second.
It makes no sense because they don’t have good intentions.
Why is it so hard for people to go along with a hypothetical?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News