143
Recognizing that their brand is cancer, AIPAC halts public endorsements and traceable direct contributions to candidates
"as per executive order, we are now SuperIntelligencePAC"
Now they'll be secretly donating through subsidiaries and shell companies.
"We have examined our political impact, and discovered that we are just as toxic as the nation we represent."
The KKK is known to put their public facing support towards those who they wanted to lose. That is at least before Trump gave their ideology enough cover to give real endorsements. I guess that's where we're heading with AIPAC
The best part about this is that their new policy will still bribe politicians with millions in cash, but will now enable those politicians to state they do NOT take PAC donations or money from AIPAC. They’re publicly stating they will do the same bribes behind closed doors now to give politicians cover on the incredibly unpopular policy of Israel First. Truly absurd.
In other words, they're going to hide their donations and influence from the public.
This. Their brand is toxic af. There will be other shell orgs dumping money in.
I suspect Chuck took them aside and said, “Fellas, we gotta work something else out here”
But yes. Donating via many individuals now, instead of as a PAC. Is what the PAC will be doing.
Yes, through individuals, but still doing via PACs but either a super PAC (United Democracy Project) or many smaller PACs with inconspicuous names.
https://toddtipton.substack.com/p/partial-list-of-groups-that-are-actively
Also, AIPAC is one of many pro-Israel PACs
JSTREET, JDCA, AIPAC, DMFI, JAC are some of the big ones.
So they're obfuscating it more now.
Task failed successfully. All donations now routed through proxy organizations. Initiate shadow war.
#SelfAwareWolves
They still own Bari Weiss
Start the clock in January, Democrats will have 6 years maximum to legislate away the Citizens United loopholes and enaxt long-overdue court reform as well.
Trump will veto for the next 2 years, but making him do that will help set the stage for a president who won't.
Well that's just too bad. I enjoyed watching them waste money while simultaneously telling me who not to vote for.
Is it because they know it would be akin to organizing deck chairs on the titanic or do they know the fix is in? 🤔
Nah, they've just realized that their brand is toxic with a lot of voters, so now they're going to be doing their 'donations' in secret.
Ahh so a rebrand is coming lol. AIPACv2 lol
All this means is they’re going to donate through Shell-PACs (donation made by “Totally-not-from-AIPAC-wink) to hide their direct influence.
Since disclosure laws only go one level deep, it’s trivial to do.
Because they see maga is starting to fail. They want to start bribing democrats now. But they know they can’t do that openly.
But they do contribute to Democratic candidates. They spent over 30 million just in Michigan against El Sayed.
This seems like a big deal in a good way
It's moderately sized deal. AIPAC actually only started doing direct contributions a couple of years ago; before that IIRC they had their members and subsidiary PACs give ~~bribes~~ donations instead. Still, presumably they made that switch for a reason, so backtracking like this is basically them admitting that nobody likes them. I'm admittedly not as sure about the endorsements part.
If nothing else, it's a sign of the Overton window shifting and the US population growing more frustrated with the USA's relationship with Israel.
They're just gonna change the name and keep donating.
Excellent, keep it up forever please
Israel needs the money more for weapons
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2026
143 points (100.0% liked)
politics
31522 readers
2077 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS