this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
32 points (97.1% liked)

3DPrinting

15629 readers
210 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi everyone!

I'm curious to know which slicer you guys use.

I've been using the Creality slicer, but it seems like it pretty consistently crashes, and I've tried Cura but the print seemed stringy despite using the same settings.

How are Orca or Prusa?

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

PrusaSlicer. I like the settings better. It's a good slicer.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

I had some issues early on with Cura and switched to Prusa, and it's always worked well for me.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

I use Cura for no reason other than it's simply the most popular, and easiest to find help with 🤷

Also Prusa only provides an AppImage, which is incredibly inconvenient.

[–] wfh@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's also a community built Flatpak if you're ok with that

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago

Welp. I see it now but when I looked it up through Gnome software, it showed me nothing. Guess I should know better by now.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

There's also Orca and SuperSlicer which are forks of the same code as Prusa.

[–] Thanks4Nothing@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

Basically an executable package of an entire application for Linux. It doesn't integrate with package managers meaning you'll have to update it manually.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea. It's like a program that Linux doesn't recognize as a program.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago

I use the Flatpak version.

[–] sumpfsocke@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaykay@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Preach, best of all worlds

[–] charmed_electron@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

Another vote for prusa here. The recently added organic supports are really awesome. It’s enabled me to print some things I previously would not have attempted.

[–] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Prusa slicer, partially because I have a mk3s+ but also because I tried to use cura many times but always several minutes into using it, my entire laptop just shuts off, like the power was pulled, no logs written to disk, no error message. It's the only program to do that and I can't even report an issue because there's no logs I can submit. I assume it's related to taxing my GPU in a way that causes a power related fault.

[–] na_th_an@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I used Cura for a few years, then I tried Prusa and my print quality dramatically improved for reasons I have not figured out.

[–] Rakqoi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Haha this is exactly my experience. Pusaslicer/superslicer just make such better prints for me and I have no idea why. Despite putting so much effort into my Cura settings, Prusa just prints better out of the box with so little effort.

[–] DefiantBidet@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

SLA: Lychee free version bc fuck renting licenses

FDM: prusa slicer bc open source ftw

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cura, I've gone back to Prusa periodically but it has too many features hidden behind simple buttons or percentage sliders for me.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I used Cura about 5 years ago and my experience then was actually the inverse, especially in regards to slicing settings. There were tons of settings buried all over the GUI and you really had to dig for them.

I used KISSSlicer for a while and got into PrusaSlicer. They all seem to have their struggles from time to time. Maybe I'll try out Cura again the next time I run into a wall.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

By default all the settings are hidden, it's annoying, but you can show all of them in the settings and then it has a bunch more that I can find equivalents to in Prusa.

[–] lapis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Another OrcaSlicer user here. Started off with PrusaSlicer and switched over at a friend's recommendation, and honestly am so glad I did (it has a much nicer UI and some really neat features ported over from SuperSlicer).

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] BOFH666@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

SuperSlicer, nightly builds from GitHub.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Nightly builds with commits that happen sporadically every few months it seems 😭.

That said, it looks like some action happened since my last build. I'll have to see if the cone slicing thing is fixed...

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Cura and my self programmed vase mode slicer

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

I've almost always used PrusaSlicer just because the only printers I had access to were mk3s+.

I've started playing with Cura though because A. i wanted some more complex prints that PrusaSlicer struggled to support, and B. We also got some creality cr-30's functional at my college again. So far I still feel Prusa is easier but that's likely just familiarity.

[–] EMPig@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Cura. Works for me.

[–] u000@lemmy.wtf 3 points 11 months ago

Prusaslicer

[–] atocci@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Cura has always been my go-to because we used it back in my high school drafting class and I haven't tried anything else since then...

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Whichever one works. I switch between Cura and PS. I'm not skilled enough to figure out the differences. I make small adjustments here and there, but IDK what I'm doing. My last print had over extrusion on the top surface, but not the walls, so I switched from Cura to PS and it works now.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Cura but only because I haven't tried the others yet.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

Makerware. Been trying cura but it's not cooperating with my printer entirely.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've only used cura (no particular reason, just what was shown to me and I now know how to use it

However, I've heard good things about both prusa and klipper

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Klipper is not a slicer. It's a replacement firmware for the printer.

[–] Sir_Fridge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Prusaslicer. For resin I combine it with UVtools

[–] tagginator@utter.online -4 points 11 months ago

New Lemmy Post: Which slicer do you use (https://lemmy.world/post/9450344)
Tagging: #3dprinting

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md