They'll find out soon that there are other search engines out there.
Good - you'll be doing those kids a favor. And there's certainly more and better search engines out there. Google can go outside and play hide and go fuck itself.
Don't theaten kids with a good time
I see they're well into the "Are we out of touch? No it's our customers that are wrong" stage.
They know exactly what they're doing.
Google search is too embedded in most things for schools to forego it. They're strong arming the schools to use AI, while giving the illusion of choice
Why would google search be embedded? Like change the bookmark to ddg and you're done right?
do Chromebooks even allow changing the homepage? also many schools use search "by Google" for searching their websites.
Google Workspace/Education tools might be, but search is a commodity now and Google's is terrible now.
But yeah, I still think you're right upon reflection.
hah, do it
Seriously - do you want an entire generation who knows how to live without Google search? Because that's how you get an entire generation that knows alternatives to Google. This is a huge opportunity for the likes of Bing, DuckDuckGo, StartPage, etc...
This is a huge opportunity for the likes of Bing, DuckDuckGo, StartPage, etc...
Ah yes, Bing, Bing, and Bing
I am sorry, Bing?!?
As a realistic choice for an educational partner? Yes, absolutely. I'm not saying you should use Bing or that it's all that great, I'm saying that Microsoft should absolutely trying to eat Google's lunch on this.
Hey Google, did it ever occur to you that people will leave your ass over forced AI? I'm on GraphneOS now, out of Google Drive, and I'd like to be even further from Google.
Only a small percentage of people are willing to think and put some effort in, the zombie population continues to grow. That is one of the reasons why large corporations hardly even bother with customer service any more, customers are now expendable, every one that leaves, is immediately replaced with another.
You're one of the few. If I ask 10 people out on the street what they use, it's Google. I'd sooner find a vegan than even a duckduckgo user. Also, veganism didn't change the world either, meat industry going strong. This thinking isn't helping your cause, you need to consider what would actually change things.
This thinking isn't helping your cause
What thinking are you referring to, from the comment to which you’re responding?
The meat industry is not just "going strong". Tge meat industry owns the vegan industrie. Every major vegan brand is owned by a major meat company.
Every major processed plant based brand in the usa is no doubt owned by corpse lords, but they don't own food itself... although monsanto has been trying to do just that for decades.
Exactly... that's why I think this commentary "I vote with my wallet" is tiresome. I think we are long past that as something that can be weaponized against corps who are basically as powerful as the government now.
That is a terrible attitude, apathy is evils best friend.
Oh no! Now students will have to... checks notes ... use a good search engine.
I grew up in the wild west days, and we were explicitly told never to just trust one search engine and to try a couple and pay attention to differences...
Like, Google is seriously shooting themselves in the foot here, and we need to understand the reason they're willing to do this, is getting kids hooked on AI means they're always going to need AI.
It legitimately changes how brains work, and shoving it down k-12's throat in school is doing a lot of damage
That is what google et al want though, they want zombies, they do not want free thinkers. None of this is by accident, and the userbase/population is so large now that they are unlikely to fail in creating dystopia. The very wrong people are in charge.
I legitimately don't know how you read my comment and missed that it implied everything you "added" already...
Gemini suuuuucks. It's barely better than copilot. You'd think Google, of all companies, would have seemless integration with their main apps, like maps or Google search, but they don't.
They've copied the hamfisted shoehorning of Microslop and are just trying to force people to use a shitty product they don't want.
I see this as a win. They'll learn how to research the manual way.
I know Google's competition has a tiny percentage of their market share, but do they really think people won't find the competition if they have a good enough reason?
Some will, most won't (in general)
A large issue these days is that things often need to 'go viral' to change, and unfortunately (due to marketing) they often tend to go viral in the wrong direction
I have no idea why anyone would continue to use google now, but so many do
The stupider children are, the easier it is to brainwash them. This is what religion has been doing for decades. Intelligent Humans are a danger to con men.
Thats some balls. Was that really a threat? Your offering services to students and got hurt when they don't want to be forced into using something they never wanted and something that will just give the company more info on them.
I kind of love when they get to this size, because this is where the things come out that contradict who they say they are and you really get to see what they care about. I just hope people see this and find new tools to use.
Honestly, I support this
Just note that online life is so embedded in everyone, including your life, that taking away google search from a kid is like taking away transport that isn't horse, just for the 21st century. Like wouldn't it be funny if a company said that they won't sell you a car you liked/could afford because you didnt want AI in it? You can't board this bus because there's an AI security bot in it? That's what's going to happen with this precedent. Be careful what you celebrate.
No
taking away google search from a kid is like taking away transport that isn’t horse, just for the 21st century.
Bullshit.
Plenty of other search engines (such as Duck Duck Go) are sitting right there, waiting to go. It's debatable whether they're quite as good as Google's search ... but they're good enough for 99% of what you need, at least.
To fix your analogy, this is like taking away transport that isn't a Tesla. Plenty of ways to get around without getting into a Tesla.
Of course, they are probably going to use something like duckduckgo - I am glad at least in 2026, search engines are still not monopolized. This is not the point.
I am still concerned of this precedent being set "we will punish you from everyday life if you choose to opt out". For now we have Toyotas, and Fords, and BMWs. We have Lemmy as an alternative to the Reddit monopoly. In 50 yrs, the biggest companies will get eaten up, bought out, or become an illusion of an "independent company", say how Hummer is now owned by GMC. One day duckduckgo will either shut down or be forced to be bought out by Bing. Starting your own becomes prohibitively expensive, and I dont refer to having a team building your search engine itself I am talking legal, red tape. Can you believe in almost 30 yrs, I cant have an open source linux mobile phone that passes cryptography checks required for banking apps? In this phone monopoly, when we lose a new personal right every month? Are you gonna tell me "just go into the branch in person bro"? For how long is that building going to be there?
To use another analogy, you're pleased you have a packet of 100 bandaids to fix an open wound when we are actually hemorrhaging on the inside. We should not see the school to use a non-AI search engine as the end of the story, that's bad strategy. Need to look whats NEXT from here
say how Hummer is now owned by GMC
lol, that's a particularly lame example, though. Hummer was always owned by GM (GMC's parent company), from the very first Hummer that ever rolled off an assembly line. (Okay, actually, there was a space of a few years there after the 2008 recession where the Hummer brand was actually owned by a Chinese company, before GM bought it back.)
Edit: This wasn’t meant to be as creepy as I now see it is given the context of the article, but was meant to be aimed towards Google ruining their business model, which I welcome. I love watching them ruin their business by trying to force AI into everything to compete with OpenAI or Anthropic. Screw Google, I hope they fall from grace hard.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.