4
submitted 1 day ago by Osm@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/55185832

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for recommendations on free (or freemium) AI assistants that meet these criteria:

✅ Strong capabilities – Can handle complex questions and research. ✅ Privacy-respecting – Doesn't train on user data, preferably E2E encrypted. ✅ Ethical stance – Not complicit in oppression or human rights violations (Palestine, sudan, uygur, etc). ✅ Not on BDS list – Companies that aren't supporting or profiting from occupation.

Which AI tools have you found that respect both privacy AND human rights?

I'd really appreciate honest recommendations and experiences. Trying to find tools that align with my values without sacrificing functionality.

Thanks in advance! 🤝

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

If you ahve a mid range or above GPU you can run local models. You can even run them in a VM or firejail so they do not get any network access.

But please use llama.cpp, not ollama. Ollama has a storied history of poor behavior toward the OSS community. It used llama.cpp as its core tech, while trying to conceal that it did. It refused to disclose that, despite being required by the MIT open source license. It took venture capital money as it concealing its reliance on llama.cpp. And layering closed source components on top.

Many users argue that Ollama is merely a wrapper around llama.cpp and that its developers make no contributions to the core library, effectively exploiting Georgi Gerganov’s code while failing to acknowledge his actual contribution to the success of their product.

Lots more info here, and many other sources. It made bad technical choices and acted sleazy toward OSS projects. Pls don't reward this kind of behavior. It's better to directly use llama.cpp. Also there is less obscuration that way, since ollama insists on misleading renamings, etc.

Friends Don't Let Friends Use Ollama

Under the hood, it was llama.cpp doing all the work. For over a year, Ollama’s README contained no mention of llama.cpp. Not in the README, not on the website, not in their marketing materials. The project’s binary distributions didn’t include the required MIT license notice for the llama.cpp code they were shipping. This isn’t a matter of open-source etiquette, the MIT license has exactly one major requirement: include the copyright notice. Ollama didn’t.

[-] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Private, it is not, but there is an endeavor in India to outsource the computations to users, using whatever computational power each user can spare from their smartphones and laptops during low to no usage hours (nights, for instance). The idea is that with a population of the size of India, it would be possible for such a "p2p model training" to contend with big tech's unethical data centers.

[-] Osm@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Crazy idea. Can you explain more

[-] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

I think your only actually privacy option is to run Ollama locally. Any 2-3b parameters model with Q4 quant will run okay on a decent laptop

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
4 points (60.0% liked)

Privacy

52018 readers
658 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS