There’s a lot to probe and arrest but make it work. You go after everyone. Have have to do it all while you work on your campaign promises and fix what Trump broke. All of it.
Tier 1:
- affordability efforts
- universal healthcare
- end Iran war
- end military support for Israel
Tier 2:
- abolish ICE
- prosecute the corrupt
- codify body autonomy
- reform the supreme court
Tier 3:
- end Cuban blockade
- end the electoral college
This is by no means an exhaustive list, but they need to get results on Tier 1 ASAP in order to maintain progressive and MAGA turncoat votes.
The EC will quite likely be effectively ended by states before Congress gets to it. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will make the EC follow the popular vote, not the stupid state-based voting currently being done.
People need their food stamps back too, the ones Trump kicked off. Disabled people kicked off other aid too.
Not putting SC reform in tier 1 is an immediate L
SC reform can't happen until 2029, so no it doesn't belong in tier 1 on pragmatic grounds alone
If there is a 2029 lmao
... Sorry, off topic, but why is your icon the buc-ees mascot? Those guys chug maga cock like their life depends on it.
Irony. Think punks and John Lennon rocking Mickey Mouse tees. Buc-ee's is the height of MAGA brain rot culture. A gas station treated as some sort of cultural identity.

That said, they are great rest stops...

My husband brought me bucees sweat pants from his business trip to Austin, we both had a laugh. Then we read up on the owners 😳.

The fact that they won't sue him means we should all be able to safely use this.
Put it on a bunch of gas stations.
She really blew it when she decided to announce that she wasn't going to back anyone else against establishment "leadership."
She's on a tightrope.
She has a lot of people whispering in her ear to primary Schumer in 2028, and calling for someone else to be the majority leader would essentially be a declaration of intent when she's still weighing her options between that, running for President, accepting a VeeP nomination, or maybe joining the cabinet in 2029.
That's not a tightrope. Those are just different ways for her to personally respond to the same problem. She could say Chuck and Hakeem suck publicly and all of those options are still on the table.
If she doesn't persue Schumer's seat in 2028, she'd be making a powerful senator from her own state an enemy needlessly. She has no vote in the Senate leadership, and she's not going to change the mind of anyone who does have a say in it. Her strongest allies in the Senate are already going to vote against him. What good does publicly chastising him do?
It lets her constituents and supporters know that she understands and shares their position. That's the whole purpose of having a representative in the first place. They are supposed to say things on your behalf, and not only when it benefits them personally. In fact, I would argue that you can't be a good representative if you aren't willing to do that when it doesn't personally benefit you.

Jeffries represents the Epstein class. Anyone voting for him is dead to me.
can you make them dead for everyone instead?
Too bad Fungus Con can hand out pardons faster than Congress can indict his henchpeople
Accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. In doing so they wave their 5th amendment rights and can be compelled to testify. Which they should all be. Everything thurroughly investigated and documented. Hopefully re incriminating them and others with state charges.
Ya, none of them will actually pay any really consequences. Very good argument for limiting the pardon power of the president.
Probably a better argument for making guillotines
Ooh, how scary! Well luckily Hakeem Jeffries who she endorses is going to do nothing about it.
Well luckily Hakeem Jeffries who she endorses is going to do nothing about it.
You've twisted her words, and she's already explained it.
The Speaker selection takes place in roughly three weeks via a fixed ballot. There are no write-ins. Candidates who want to be considered have to write a letter to the entire Democratic house caucus announcing their intention.
Right now, today, there is no one other than Jeffries on that ballot.
So explain to the rest of us how she -- or any other House dem -- can elect a different candidate for Speaker when there is no other candidate currently running.
Does she? The best endorsement I've heard generally is "well, no one else is stepping up..." which is lukewarm at best lol
NGL kind of wish some of these congresspeople would stfu so the criminals have less time to prepare before January.
The ones that are smart enough already started preparing as soon as the map started to go blue.
The others are too incompetent to actually hide their crimes.
Criminals are going to do what criminals do. The election results were a warning, they'll prepare for things even if everyone was quiet about it. I say keep talking, pump up their anxiety. Get Trump pissed off more, he tends to fire people then.
I find it hilarious that you think Republicans do or don’t do things based on how much we talk about them doing it lmao. Very gullible thinking.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News