53

Title. :)

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

If there is one thing you shouldn't cheap out on imo it's the storage.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 14 points 2 years ago

There is probably some iron triangle to be found there; cheap, large capacity ,reliable ; chose two.

[-] Overspark@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

You can have all three of those, but you won't get great performance. The Samsung QVO SATA drives are a great example. I wouldn't use those for an OS drive but they're fantastic for NAS or media use.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

So not fast. Which means the original still holds true.

[-] Overspark@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

Oh I agree with your post, but I was responding to Valmond who used different criteria.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 years ago

Personally I have focused on fast SSD storage and utilized the vast, cheap, slow storage available with mechanical drives for backup.

At the end of the day, if an SSD fails, you're effectively just screwed. If a mechanical drive fails, there is some possibility that the data is recoverable. But moreover, mechanical storage is so cheap by volume that you can just have redundant backup and never worry about it, really.

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.

[-] Postcard64@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there's another failure before that, it's likely a full failure.

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

To my knowledge, that isn't a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).

[-] liori@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago
[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Someone convince them to move to lemmy

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 years ago

They’ve at least created a website that houses the SSD tier lists, buying guide, etc: https://borecraft.com/

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The point is to run TLC drives. SLC drives of that capacity are too expensive and are thus not recommended.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

WD Green /shrug

I’ve been using all Red Pros since I first built my nas, but it started with a couple of green 2TB that where in there for like 7 years before being replaced (didn’t die yet)

[-] ReducedArc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Same, we're ones of dozens I'm sure but I've been running a mix of WD greens and Seagate barracudas in a hardware RAID5 array for over a decade. Only had 2 drive failures over the entire time with no data loss. But yeah... would advise against that if possible

[-] asbestos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Your local network is probably 1Gbit or 2.5Gbits so you’ll be good with SATA as an aux drive, say a Samsung 870 QVO. I’d recommend running a smaller NMVe as your main one.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Or even USB 3+, should that be cheaper.

[-] asbestos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I’d recommend the QVO for storage needs, and I’ve seen 8TB versions go for $400 so I’d say it’s insanely cheap considering it’s still an SSD and saturates the SATA protocol.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Soon SSD-based RAIDz1.

[-] code@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

I have 8 of these in 4tb. They are wonderful and ive not had a single issue

[-] ArtikBanana@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Transcend ssd220s (4tb SATA) can be found for really nice prices.
Even had a thread about this one on Lemmy cuz I wasn't sure how good it is (it's great).

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Perhaps running a mirror or a stripe array would be more important than selecting drives that don't fail. Then you can pick whatever that's not complete garbage. That said, it would likely still be more expensive overall.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Been using Sabrent Rocket SSDs for awhile. Been reliable and fast. They aren't the cheapest SSDs, but they perform well and don't break the bank.

[-] Hatecoach@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

My only Sabrent Rocket SSD i had started failing within 6 months. Got it in Jan, cut it into pieces and threw it away in June.

[-] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
NAS Network-Attached Storage
NVMe Non-Volatile Memory Express interface for mass storage
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

[Thread #356 for this sub, first seen 14th Dec 2023, 22:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A SATA ADATA SU800 died on me after 4 years of use. (Luckily I had a weekly harddrive backup so I lost almost nothing! :D)

Samsung, WD, Lexar, Kingston generally are known reliable name brands (but Samsung warranty doesn't work well in Canada). If you watch !bapcsalescanada@lemmy.ca like a hawk (Canada's PC part sales mirrored from Reddit) you may find the occasional deal that is at or under $50/TB Canadian (roughly 36 US$, 35€)

E:I noticed it hasn't posted in a couple days, wonder if it died or got banned

[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Used enterprise SSDs is what I'm running, bit of work to filter down the results on eBay though.

[-] randombullet@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

I use enterprise drives because they're cheaper and more reliable.

Got some 4TB enterprise NVMe for 150 each. They only had 3TB written, basically brand new.

[-] bestusername@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

I've been running a couple ADATA Nvme drives since 2019. No issues and they're fast.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

While it doesn't see much use (sporadic), my 'value' Adata nvme drive has been solid and performing as expected in my gaming laptop; also from 2019.

[-] bestusername@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Running 2x ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro M.2 NVMe, 500Gb for OS and VMs and a 2Tb for games and documents.

I figured it was worth the gamble on this cheaper brand since everything important is synched/baked up to my server.

AAANNNDD that server is synched to my old NAS.

[-] CazRaX@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

ADATA nVme, SATA m.2 and SATA are my go to for cheap upgrades for laptops and have had no problems with them. Even have a few in external USB cases for large capacity, fast, portable storage and they work great.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

buffalo, SanDisk, Samsung have all done me well.

[-] tagginator@utter.online 1 points 2 years ago

New Lemmy Post: Please recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal) (https://lemmy.world/post/9575456)
Tagging: #SelfHosted

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I've heard good things about the netac n7000, (not the n7000t!), but I have not bit the bullet yet on buying one

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
53 points (92.1% liked)

Selfhosted

62096 readers
125 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS