this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
517 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2471 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven't gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers' salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy's ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract "credible people to run for office."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 213 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Let's just build a big congressional dorm with furnished studio apartments and make them all live there when Congress is in session. It would save the government a fortune in cost of living reimbursements and security costs.

[–] Dukeofdummies@kbin.social 73 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

You know genuinely I don't understand why this isn't a thing. It's expensive to have two homes, especially when you aren't even sure you'll have the job for more than four years. It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

Shoving someone into a land full of surprise expenses seems like a perfect recipe for corruption.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

It sounds like you understand perfectly well. Politics is for rich people to get more power, and get richer by granting favors to their friends. "Public servant" is the lie they tell to make us feel good about it.

Yes, I know that there are the few modest politicians, but it's the exception to the rule.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 137 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they should skip their avocado toast or drink less Starbucks?

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 10 months ago

Something something bootstraps

[–] teft@startrek.website 126 points 10 months ago (6 children)

If inflation has eaten away at your 6 figure salary that hasn’t been updated since 2009 imagine how the plebs making $7.25/hr feel.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 102 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Tie their pay to a multiplier of the minimum wage.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 39 points 10 months ago (5 children)

And don't give them the authority to change the multiplier number.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 93 points 10 months ago

Id be significantly more open to this if you assholes hadn't spent the last 50 years helping steal money from the poor for billionaires.

[–] brennansv@sfba.social 81 points 10 months ago (9 children)

@MicroWave @steinbring We should not increase their pay. Instead we should simply provide housing connected with public transit so members of Congress can cut some of their costs and actually experience what it is like to live this way. They already get great healthcare and access to a fitness center and cafeteria.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I understand what you're saying but I think you can't get elected to a national house or senate seat without being wealthy or very connected to wealth.

The income is mostly just a joke. There should be an equitable way for people without an income or wealthy connections to be elected on merit and opinions rather than by virtue of giant funding.

Personally I vote for election advertising bans by 3rd parties and to make all election advertising done through a collective pool of funds shared by all candidates. These fucking PACs are a big problem today and they are everywhere

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Most of us don't have wealth

Reality disagrees. While over half of Congress are millionaires, the highest credible number for the US population in general is 12%

In fact, the 100 highest earners in Congress more than doubled (https://ballotpedia.org/Personal_Gain_Index_(U.S._Congress) their personal wealth in a single year, with the top 10 "earners" increasing their wealth on average 422% in a single year!

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hey, everyone: he just said 12% of the United States population are millionaires. More than one out of every 10 people. Think about that.

Guess how net worth looks for the bottom 88%.

Wealth disparity in this country is insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Congressional pay rate should be tied to national minimum wage rate. In order to raise one you have to raise both by the same percentage.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 64 points 10 months ago

If you can't live on 170k a year, you probably shouldn't be making decisions for those on 30k.

[–] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 58 points 10 months ago (5 children)

If they're struggling, then maybe they should pick up a second job, maybe cancel some of those subscription services?

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Stop buying Starbucks and avocado toast

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I am completely down with paying Congress a shit ton of money, but we're going to need a zero tolerance policy on bribery and lobbying.

You're not going to get CEO payment and tips.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Funny how they cry about not being able to live on almost 200grand a year, yet they expect my grandmother to live on 12k a year from social security.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 49 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The equivalent of $83/hr if they worked 40 hrs a week for 52 weeks. I think their pay is fine just where it is.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Clearly he just needs to buy less avacado toast and get a third job.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] t3h_fool@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Federal minimum wage in 2009: 7.25. Federal minimum wage in 2023: 7.25. Cry me a fuckin river.

[–] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Maybe congresses salary should be a multiple of minimum wage so they always get increased together.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No joke, but many of them do essentially bunk together, especially the ones that aren't horribly corrupt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Hey Buddy, most of us don't have wealth, either.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago (12 children)

This isn't as wild as it sounds.

A family friend was elected to Congress, and he had been an HVAC contractor prior to his election, and the move to DC was financially difficult because DC housing is very expensive and they still had a mortgage back in their district.

How did he work things out? He started accepting donations, and that's as slippery slope. He's become as corrupt as they come and I'm ashamed to have been his friend.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd be happy to have tax funded basic housing for them in DC.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (13 children)

To be fair, they need a house in their hometown and a house in DC. That can be extremely expensive. You want congressmen to be financially independent so that they don't need to accept bribes and such.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (5 children)

They'd still accept bribes if they were paid 5 million a day.

Its not about the money.

its about the position, and power.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 38 points 10 months ago (8 children)

are you fucking kidding me. if my salary had kept up with inflation, id be making 250k. if average people dont get that benefit, why the fuck should they.

on top of that, they have rules specifically allowing them to game the stock market with their insider knowledge.

if you cant make money being a congresscritter, youre just not trying.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 37 points 10 months ago

'Most of us don't have wealth'

Welcome to the fucking club.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

while i agree that it's probably hard since you essentially have to travel and live in two places id have a lot more sympathy if they also didn't continually push for tax cuts for billionaires while opposing minimum wage increases, or voting against single payer while having government funded healthcare, or voting against the inflation reduction act...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly that’s more fucking money than they deserve. They spend more time bickering than working it seems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They should give up their avocado toast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] calypsopub@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

It should be tied to federal minimum wage. You want a raise? The rest of us get one, too.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Seriously guys when do we start burning shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Then. What. The. Fuck. Do. You. Think. Life. Is. Like. For. Your. Constituents.

These idiots are literally building their own gallows to be strung up on. Mind boggling lack of foresight.

No, no, no. Calm down everyone. No one has ever died from revolutions triggered by oppressed populations...

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They need to stop whining and work harder on pulling themselves up by the bootstraps.

Hmmm, not so fun when that bullshit refrain is thrown back in your faces, is it Republican politicians.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 27 points 10 months ago

As others have said, tie it to minimum wage increases.

Also... I would trade paying them ten times as much for a prohibition on them owning or trading in the stock market in a heart beat. It's inherently a conflict of interest that puts them at odds with the majority of their constituents.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's equivalent to 24,000 hours at the federal minimum wage.

There are only 8,760 hours in a year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Encode1307@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago

This is why only rich people that don't give a shit about normal people end up in Congress. Regular people can't afford to be in Congress.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] WeeSheep@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If they're whining about making over twice the median income, they should consider making moves to lower the cost of living for everyone else. If it's not good enough for them, why should the rest of us suffer?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Maybe there can be dorm rooms for congress

load more comments
view more: next ›