this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
551 points (98.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21126 readers
890 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    all 27 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 91 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Meanwhile on Windows: "That's just my antivirus. Yeah... I won't be very productive for the next 20 minutes."

    It's a real problem. I think there's a Firefox bug where Firefox will freeze while checking for updates while the CPU is under heavy load.

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    It's fucked-up that Firefox even checks for updates itself (instead of letting the package manager do it) in the first place. It wouldn't have the bug if it didn't have the unnecessary functionality.

    [–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 9 months ago

    Just invent a physical package manager where you get all your software packages in the mail every week :D

    [–] johnassel@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Interesting. On which distro? I don't have this problem on Fedora. Here the update check is disabled by default.

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    In context, my comment was really more about dunking on Windows for not having proper package management. Firefox only "needs" that feature because it's working around Windows' deficiencies.

    [–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 3 points 9 months ago

    I'm pretty sure it's disabled on the M$ Store version.

    Also, on macOS it's so annoying that literally every app checks for (and even wants to install) updates while I have the Brew package manager installed.

    [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago

    You can disable it, but yeah... You shouldn't have to if it's being handled by the package manager

    [–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Any chance this could be disabled? I'm realizing I may run into this problem quite a bit

    [–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Yeah, probably easiest & best to uninstall and reinstall with a package manager. Anything that manages updates will likely have Firefox configured to not check for updates

    If you are a GUI kind of guy try your OS's app store.

    Otherwise apt, yum, homebrew or winget should do the trick :)

    Heres an informative forum post about it: https://superuser.com/questions/1370165/disable-or-control-upgrading-of-firefox

    [–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

    I thought the problem was that they WEREN'T configured to not check for updates. Will look into this

    [–] furycd001@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

    I can make Firefox use way too much resources simply by visiting an Instagram profile & opening the toolbox on a few posts to inspect the code....

    [–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Finding: It’s our new intrusion detection software deployed across the enterprise that reads every byte read or written to disk and memory.

    Check for updates and maybe, just maybe, the vendor, fickle gods that they are, will release an update that doesn’t mistakenly triple scan everything.

    [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

    Then the intrusion detection software ends up being the entry vector for a virus and the company doesn’t learn its lesson

    [–] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Someone has worked for the DoD...

    [–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

    Corporate experience

    [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

    Department of the Delta Quadrant?

    [–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    We've had one virus scan, yes, but what about second virus scan?

    [–] GluWu@lemm.ee 42 points 9 months ago

    That moment when you hear the fans slowing down, realize they shouldn't have been running high, and you have no idea how long they were. I'm hardware, not software, so I just assume my robot master has artificial constipation.

    [–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    A testing lemmy instance with no users just did that for 24 hours before I turned it off. The fans woke me during the night

    [–] marcos@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

    Last time I got a scare like that, it was the monitoring agent that had some code with a performance that depended o the number it measured.

    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Debian, at some point, had updatedb scheduled as a cronjob by default. Nearly shit my pants thinking I was hacked when it started up on my computer out of the blue haha.

    [–] kuneho@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

    deluge 👌

    [–] autoexec@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    From a what?