this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
278 points (100.0% liked)

196

16714 readers
2595 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry for two new pinned posts within the span of 24 hours. after coming back I figured some of the rules needed some updating, and it is policy to put any rule change up to vote for the members.

The two changes I currently would like to make, is increased enforcement of the moldy posting rule, and a new rule banning AI generated content.

moldy posting is when you post a meme that you would find on your aunt's Facebook page or Elon musk's Twitter account. I'm talking properly old, moldy, watermarked, painfully irrelevant posts. I think we should remove them simply because they kind of suck, and removing them would raise the level of quality of 196.

I believe we should ban AI generated content because it is exploitative by nature, and I don't think we should be feeding it.

please discuss in the comments, and vote on whether or not you think these changes should be made. vote on each change separately. if there are any other rule changes that you would like to suggest, now is the time.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 58 points 11 months ago

I disagree with the anti-AI bandwagon.

I am indifferent to moldy memes.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Totally in favor in banning AI content.

Sometimes moldy content is funny, often times it just doesn't land. Part of my concern with a moldy ban is that it seems a bit vaguely defined as is.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Agreed. One man's mold is another man's psychedelic substance. It's a subjective line that varies for everyone.

AI is easy because the line is clear.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I'm in favor of the anti AI rule but against the anti moldy posts rule.

Also, could you remove that image from the post, I almost reported the post for "unflagged NSFW" because of it.

Edit: Reported it after an hour for the "unflagged NSFW" maybe that will get their attention on removing the image from the post because there's literally no reason for it to be there.

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 11 months ago

gormadt I would like to remind you of our NSFW rules. skimpy clothing is not considered NSFW, and neither are breasts. maybe if it was just the woman on the left, it would count as softcore porn, but in the context of my macaroni is a lesbian by Chuck tingle it is obviously more funny than "sexy"

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Also agree entirely. The moldy posting is funny because it's not and it deserves to be here.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreed on removing the image. I upvoted because I thought it was a regular post and not a rule change

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I only visited this post because of the image & now I’m performing cunnilingus on a bowl of Mac & Cheese.

Please remove the image.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 11 months ago

I don't like the idea of increasing enforcement against moldy posts, just because I'm not super plugged in to things and I don't always know if something is moldy when I post it. Over enforcement of those kind of subjective rules tends to make it difficult for newbies to post.

Completely on board with a no AI art rule though. Fuck AI.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if there were like a "moldy Monday" thing instead of an outright ban? I agree with others that they're fun ironically.

Absolutely in favor of banning AI generated content though.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Moldy Mondays & Fermenting Fridays for all!

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

i'm not here to contribute to the discussion

i just wanted to say that chuck tingle is treasure to humanity

[–] Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Moldy Mondays as another has mentioned is my vote. Ban ai posts though

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am painfully unaware if a post might be moldy because I don’t social media much and I like stupid things, so let me know if something I post is moldy and I’ll machete it.

Edit oh and these rules are reasonable I’d say

[–] ShadowFox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 11 months ago

Not sure about the first change, but I absolutely support the second one. Fuck AI "art"!

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm in favor of "Moldy Mondays" as some people have mentioned.

And I support banning AI images, but not when it's like a Twitter screenshot that says something about the image.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

I really disliked this feature of many reddit subs where they'd have day of the week themes and posts. This idea in itself is moldy, its just reminds me of a smelly office atmosphere.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've Chuck Tingle posted in the past, so I was concerned that this was going to be an anti-Tingle policy, but fortunately it seems like it's about other things

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

anti-tingle policy
I'd rather die

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I'm indifferent to outdated and AI content.

Personally I don't think it's worth adding more to the rules than needed, especially when there are already people confused about what counts and what doesn't.

[–] S410@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, blanket banning things using logic riddled with faulty generalization and facts proven by assertion. Totally not a bad idea! Totally!

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

AI poster spotted

[–] Maxxus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

I feel like both rules suffer from the same problem of spectrum. We can all point to a bad moldy/ai post and point to a good moldy/ai post. The issue is going to be those ones in the grey space between. It’s like the threshold test for obscenity.

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that." -Justice Potter Stewart

I agree ai generation can be exploitative, but I don’t believe it’s only exploitative. I’m sure there are fine artists out there who can use it responsibly to make genuine art. I think it’s like the Unity game engine. There are plenty of games pumped out that are just trash trying to make quick money, but there’s also gems being made by people with passion.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Most of my contributions are moldy memes so obviously I don't agree with this rule. This would impact the already little effort I put into my posts. And I know effort isn't something we put into 196 but that's my observation. I'm willing to revisit this later.

I support banning AI memes because those require less than zero effort already.

[–] RavindraNemandi@ttrpg.network 11 points 11 months ago

I am in favor of both of these changes. I always feel lowkey like ive been tricked when i realize im looking at AI art, and the moldy posts just feel like mud to slog through sometimes.

[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 11 points 11 months ago

Moldyposts were fun ironically, but i'm fine moving past them. I'm also on board with giving toaster generated posts the boot. Also, this comment counts as my post before i leave, see you all next sticky

[–] flamingos@ukfli.uk 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe instead of banning mouldy memes, there could be restrictions for when they can be posted. Mouldy Monday or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

I'm against banning moldy posting, I agree with banning AI

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

As someone who accidently posted AI generated crap before here without realising it was AI generated:

I'm all for the ban

[–] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this sub should have any more rules.

Ai images can be very funny. And who cares about moldy images? Just downvote.

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Forgot about that, lol.

So stupid.

I wonder what happens if I downvote you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SmoochyPit@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago

I’m in favor of both.

Moldy posting can be fun in sarcastic contexts, but I’m not opposed to a full ban since lots of moldy posts makes the sub overall moldy, too.

Gen ai is plagiarism and discourages creativity.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

I'm curious what the discussions regarding what is or isn't considered moldy is going to look like.

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

I'm fine with banning both of these.

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

don't really care either way about the ai thing but deffo ban moldy posts. we already have !funny@lemmy.world or !memes@lemmy.world for that kinda stuff

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago (8 children)

What do you mean by 'increased enforcement of the moldy posting rule'? I thought we only had one rule? /srs

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

this is me voicing my dissent against the moldy posts rule, including restricting them to mondays. unless presented with a very clear set of examples that we can all (or majority) agree on, i think there’s no real utility to the rule and it just makes me afraid to post an image that i find genuinely funny.

on a level of pure aesthetics, it also just has a gross feel and i don’t want to log in on mondays to the word ‘moldy’ all over my feed ☹️

@moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone please reconsider this rule or provide more information on the kind of content you intend on removing. i believe this choice to be contra to the spirit of 196.

good choice banning AI tho, thanks for that. 👍

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

Eh, yah, think those sound like good rules but I wouldn’t worry about enforcing them to hard unless there’s someone flaunting them repeatedly.

[–] joystick@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Put a chick in it and make her gay

[–] cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

water is sick and gross and chocolate milk is better

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I see someone has chosen violence today

[–] snapoff@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Blocked and reported. Unless you’re drinking chocolate milk with your spaghetti, as Chuck Tingle intended.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Here here!

Also is your lawyer accepting new clients?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

NGL the thing that will improve the quality of c/196 is getting me to follow the rule and encouraging original posts rather than sharing content. What makes a community great is understanding those who are in it.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 3 points 11 months ago

I agree to both rule changes. Thanks for modding!!! And Thanks everyone in m/196 for keeping me laughing!

load more comments
view more: next ›