People have been using country TLDs as cute URLs for years, and somehow it almost always ends up as a problem, or it furthers harms against the countries who own the TLDs (.io for example). Sure .tv or .io or .af sound fun, (anyone remember del.icio.us?) but it's just not worth it.
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37738 readers
599 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?
That's a horrible thing the British government have done
I'm not sure that's a good reason not to use the domain though, if we didn't use anything that horrible people had a hand in making we wouldn't be talking here right now
They're two separate(ish) issues.
But it's still a bad idea to use national TLDs for stuff that has nothing to do with that nation.
Granted, is ICANN wasn't just a money-grabbing machine with no forward thinking they wouldn't give nations clearly "generally desirable" gTLDs, but since they did already that doesn't mean they should be misused.
It's really frustrating in general how TLDs have been misused and abused over the years. They used to have very specific meanings and usages. Now anyone can register a .net or .org, and don't have to prove they're a network service provider or a non-profit.
People also forget that URLs designate a hierarchy, reading from right to left. For example, take the URL app.foobar.com This designates
. -> There's an understood period at the end that's not typed. But it designates the root (or, well, top in this case) of the hierarchy
com -> The commercial space (hence top level domain)
foobar -> Company named Foobar in the commercial space
app -> The app site/service/etc from Foobar
If you're using a domain like foobar.tv, you're saying you're an organization called Foobar based in Tuvalu. There's still plenty of restricted TLDs (.gov and .mil e.g.), but everything has been thrown to the wind for the sake of cleverness, and spammers have ruined anything else that's not .com for your average user. Your personal info site generally isn't a commercial page, so .com doesn't make sense. But other gTLDs get blocked by default by so many admins, it's pointless to try.
do they really get blocked? It doesn't make sense to block all tlds except for a whitelist imo. As of spammers can't just buy a .com domain
Yeah, loads of them get blocked. Here's a site with discussion on some of the big ones: https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/
Perhaps I just don't see why countries need their own extensions anyway (other than ones reserved for government websites to avoid scams, but at the point of being available for public use that kinda falls down)
Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.
To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.
Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?
Yeah that makes sense I suppose.
I still think for the vast majority of io websites I've seen they probably wouldn't clash with any companies that need portals in those regions
There's also a large amount of first come first served with domains regardless of what extension they're using though, if there's no legislation around who can use what extension I'm still not convinced it's that big a deal
As I understand it, this isn't a resolved conflict in the past but rather an ongoing one. So yes, it does matter if you decide to give an oppressive British company or the Taliban money. And apart from that, as a German, I'm very much aware that we are not responsible for the wrongdoings of our ancestors but are responsible not to forget and thus repeat them. People who were victims under colonialism or any other form of oppression deserve at least recognition and compensation. Just continuing to live with the current condition shaped by oppression means supporting the oppression.
By living in the UK I am giving the British government money, there's not much I can do about that short of moving to another country
Unless the people who conquered that island and are keeping it conquered are also the ones directly responsible for the domain name?
And if they are are they really keeping that area under control just for the extension? Can't imagine it makes nearly enough money to pay for the military occupation there
load more comments
(1 replies)
There are other reasons for choosing certain TLD's. I remember back when, the .tk domain was very popular, because it was completely free.
And because of that .tk ccTLD is completely disreputable now. Everyone and their mother had one back in the day, which included all the spammers/phishers and their mothers. Now no one trusts .tk domains. Or at least they shouldn't!
Remember goatse.cx ?
Almost always? I have some strong doubts about that. It's just that you don't see articles about "Nothing is particularly going wrong with redd.it"
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml...
Do not use 2 letter country TLDs!
Well, there's another one!
It's not lost on me lol. The news site is also a .CO domain.
I think it makes a huge difference which 2-letter country. I have a couple of .au domains, and I am not stressing about that.
You'll be stressing about it when the emus take power.
Sir/Madame, I think you are confused.
The Emus won the war... Australia has been run by an Emu shadow government since 1932.
When the Emus finally reveal how much power they have been amassing we are going to have more to worry about than the .au TLD.
Need I remind you that Australia produces 8% of the worlds uranium.
There will be hell to pay when the Emu finally show themselves to the world.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I doubt my .at domains is going under, and if so I'll have bigger problems to worry about.
The headline is misleading. The Taliban did not shut down queer.af. The team behind the instance decided to move away from the domain so as to not support the Taliban through domain fees. Source: https://wedistribute.org/2024/01/queer-af-is-shutting-down-due-to-taliban/
The article explains that, yes, they did plan to move...in April. The Taliban government did, in fact, shut them down ahead of that schedule.
'idiots sign domain over to government, confused when government shuts down domain'
They knew it was risky AF (pun intended) but went for it anyway. It's not like they were confused, they expected this
Damn! Using .af for a LGBT+ site is insane! The country could have redirected the domain to their own servers and started learning the personal details of those on the site who I imagine wouldn’t be terribly thrilled having an anti-LGBT+ government learn their personal information (namely information not displayed publicly). Specifically, they could put their own servers in front of the domain so they can decrypt it, then forward the traffic on to the legitimate servers, allowing them to get login information and any other data which the user sends or receives.
Would they care enough to do all of this, though?
Why not use two letter country tlds? I have a few .uk ones.
Presumably you’re a UK citizen using .uk in accordance with the controlling entity’s terms and conditions. These folks weren’t in the same boat.
No. I LARP as being British.
How are you liking the Brexit expansion? I felt like was overhyped and overrated.
I unironically agree
I thought .uk was Ukraine?
Edit: .ua is Ukraine, .uk is the UK. It seems like the register hates the ISO...
In the ISO, UA is also Ukraine. UK is reserved because it would cause confusion with the United Kingdom, which has the code "GB".... Even though "UK" would make more sense as GB on the surface seems to exclude Northern Ireland as well as a bunch of outlying islands. Apparently they didn't like the use of "United" and "Kingdom" as they are two standard nouns. Then they proceeded to give the USA "US" so.... Yeah, it's stupid.
Yeah, but the US is all about its exceptionalism, so it gets to be the exception.
As far as I understand it, the US invented the internet (possibly through the divine inspiration of Vice President Al Gore), so it makes sense that they can make or break any rules they want.
Talking about the ISO. Not the internet.
Some other Central and Eastern European ones are weird as well.
South Africa is .za from Zuid-Africa, the dutch term for the country
At least it makes some sense, as they are mostly based on ISO 3166, as well as:
the international vehicle code for South Africa has been "ZA" since 1936. ZAR serves as the ISO 4217 currency code for the South African rand. South African aircraft registration prefixes also start with Z.
SA is the country code for Saudi Arabia.
load more comments
(1 replies)
lol