this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1943 points (97.9% liked)

memes

10411 readers
2357 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 129 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Basically that's what they did with Ocean's 11. The original Frank Sinatra version was shit. But it was a good idea, a crew of super cool dudes get together to rob a casino.

They remade it and it was very successful.

The Thing has a similar origin.

But it's rare things like that happen because Hollywood execs usually need an existing property with good numbers to greenlight a movie.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

For a second I thought you were trying to say that The Thing (2011) is a better remake of The Thing (1982), but then I remembered that 1951 version exists.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 9 months ago

Funn enough Ocean's X is also the opposite example since they didn't stop just making more of the same.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 92 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Ghost in the Shell was an unnecessary remake of a fantastic original animation that was improved by the series that followed it. There was never a need for a live action version.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Ghost in the shell was decent. They paid incredible attention to the art direction and casting ranged from perfect to acceptable. I can’t remember a single scene but their rendering of 90s retrofuturism sincerely blew me away. Maybe modern cinema has tainted me but it really wasn’t terrible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 83 points 9 months ago (8 children)

You mean take actual risks?????

No, none of that for my profit margin

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Word War Z.

Have it actually be a mocumentary with interviews. Once people start talking switch to the scene. It is a collection of short stories. Would be fun.

Or make it a mini series.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Personally I thought the book was good, but I don't think an adaptation to a movie format is the right move. Maybe a mini series would be best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Yeah I've never read the book but I've heard the movie was literally just a generic zombie movie that had nothing to do with the book.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 67 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Virtually every single bad adaptation can be directly traced back to studio interference.

Movies like LoTR only happened because the studios thought it would be a colossal flop, and so left the directors and producers alone.

If you want great movies, the studios need to leave the producers and directors the hell alone.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Counterpoint: Game of Thrones. The studio would have been happy to give them a few more seasons to develop a better ending. It's the creators who gave up and phoned in the ending we got.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] StThicket@reddthat.com 16 points 9 months ago

Also, low bugets makes the directors extra creative. They need to make the most of what they have. In my opinion, a well written plot trumps special effects every time.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 56 points 9 months ago (24 children)

I'd go one further. Do longer run remakes for good source material that ended up with a bad movie.

Golden Compass Movie = bad

His Dark Materials limited series = fantastic

[–] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, there are so many movies based on media with a deeper and richer source material than can be presented well in a 2-hour movie format. For example, the Ender's Game novel spent a significant amount of time on the progression of Ender's career at the Battle School and the movie only spent as much time as was necessary to show that he was good. A TV series could tell the parallel story of Ender's Shadow as well in the same season.

A counterexample is that sometimes the TV series may over milk the source material and drag out which should be a shorter story. The first season of American Gods was awesome, but they kept dragging out the series way too much by stretching out the stories of minor characters and fumbled in the end.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Just as long as we avoid giving money to Orson Scott Card...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 9 months ago (9 children)

They have. Dune would be one example.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Shut your pie hole! The original with Sting was amazing!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (5 children)

This is how we've ended up with 17 different attempts at the fucking Fantastic Four. Each one is shit, and EVERY director thinks that they've got the chops to make it work.

Hollywood...please....fucking stop. It doesn't get better. It's a cursed movie. Stop fucking trying to get the Fantastic Four to work. Just....put the poor thing out of its misery and let it sleep peacefully.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Ehh, some of them were to maintain Fox license from Marvel. They were contractually obligated to put out a movie every X years or they lost control of it. Mostly they just wanted something cheap or weird out of the door.

Now that Fox entertainment and Marvel have been gobbled by the mouse, it may not be a problem anymore. They sure got Reid Richards right in that doc strange film, even if he got obliterated on alternative earth.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 44 points 9 months ago

Your aim: logic.

Their aim: capitalism.

:-(

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't care what anyone says, the worldbuilding that was done for the 1990s Super Mario Bros. movie was awesome and if the movie had lived up to it, it would have been great.

Remember that when the movie was made, Mario was a plumber that jumped on mushrooms and turtles to save a princess and he had a brother named Luigi that did the same thing. That was pretty much the entire storyline they had to work with.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Video game movies in the 90s were always shit.

We had studios seeing green with franchises that had significant canon (remember, SMB, Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat all had significant backstory in their manuals, but writers/directors who knew nothing of them except that it was something their kids/nephews were obsessed with.

MK was the only one to actually use a good portion of that canon, and it was by far the best of the three. Though the soundtrack did a lot of work for it too.

Super Mario Brothers would’ve been a fun movie if they didn’t try to tie it in with the game. It wasn’t canonical at all, and 8-year-old JasonDJ was quick to realize it.

I’m more optimistic of video game movies now, now that the Gen X and Millenials that were molded by video games are in the directors chairs, and these are now major franchises with significant investment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Battlestar Galactica is a great example of something mediocre that was made great by a remake, but also something that might be greatly improved by another remake because the second half was so flawed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (12 children)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I can't believe we're in the universe where there's a Dark Tower film with the incredibly talented Idris Elba and it was so stupidly bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] crackajack@reddthat.com 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stanley Kubrick never really had an original screenplay. His movies are based from an already existing story. He reasoned that it's better to adapt a story that is good but not considered classic, because it means there is plenty to improve from such story.

I see you're emulating Kubrick's idea 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Dragonball Evolution was so shit that it drove Akira Toriyama out of retirement, which led to Battle of Gods, Resurrection F, Broly, Super Hero and an entirely new anime/manga series titled Dragon Ball Super.

It even technically is leading to Dragon Ball Daima, which looks like a serious effort to try and do the whole 'Goku is a kid again' concept that Dragon Ball GT fucked up 25 years ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I decided a few years ago to simply stop watching anything that was a remake, reboot, update or 'franchise'. Too many of them have used nostalgia and familiarity to compensate for shortcomings in storytelling. Even more cynically, leveraging intellectual property is all about money and business, whereas for me storytelling and art are about the human experience and spirit, so it's no wonder these IP films are usually so poor.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's also that Disney own almost all the known IP, and will roll it out time and again as a safe bet with predictable returns - art by focus group simply isn't a thing.

Capitalism, baybee!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Well they are taking another swing at Fantastic Four

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Some older movies that come to mind: Enemy Mine. Great sci fi premise that was ahead of its time. Just plagued with bad effects and limitations.

The Last Starfighter Not bad even for the day but I think it's a solid enough concept that could use a refresh. Set in the 80's to get the retro video game vibe. I think it could even be a multiple movie property.

Masters of the Universe It was a goofy premise with some interesting characters that were wasted. Even the updated animated series didn't do great. Or even go off in a space Western and do a Rio Blast movie.

Krull was really missing the visual elements to tell the story and it ended up cheesy and stilted (still holds some nostalgia for me though). It could still be a fun space fantasy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How are our corporate overlord supposed to know what a good story is other than the success of a movie based in them?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ironically capitalism does not like to take much risk, nor do the large companies who are best able to take them. It also sucks that many things are switching to being ads supported, so there is further limiting of creativity. For example, Love, Death, and Robots is a really awesome animated anthology. It is something that does not try to have the broadest appeal; however, the customers are now advertisers who may not want to run ads on something with a narrower audience. Oddly it seems Netflix will be going down the path of YouTube battling that to keep the content adverts will buy space for, and YouTube trying to be independent of it with its premium. Strange world.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Love, Death + Robots is amazing and everyone should watch it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darko8472@feddit.uk 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I would love a proper remake of Eragon. That movie felt so rushed, like they just chopped the meat out of the story and gave us the bloody mush instead of the whole thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

They just make the same mistakes again or do something even worse, as proven by the Resident Evil 3 remake.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (8 children)

The live action GitS? It was aight, but could've been better. As a huge fan of the story I wasn't that upset. I just didn't like what they did with Major (made her weak), and also didn't like that Section 9 was getting cucked, no one cucks section 9

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (8 children)

In the case of Dune that is just happening, which is an exception.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nayminlwin@lemmy.ml 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 18 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Dredd was fucking awesome and didn't get the justice it deserved.

I'm not a comic book guy by any means but that movie is great.

Equally so is Constantine. (And the TV show!)

Either of them have reached the levels of the worst, most generic Marvel movie.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I’m assuming you’re talking about the live action movie and I would agree. I had such high hopes for it and they (Hollywood) dropped the ball. I think it’s also a lack of understanding the source material and trying to adapt something to have a wider audience and western audience. When you involve those two things you know you’re going to be kind stepping in it. That being said I do think the props and effects done by Weta Workshop really were definitely highlights of that movie. They far exceed the casting and story. I would love to have it redone but Hollywood is gonna Hollywood and at the end of the day they (Hollywood) will shit all over source material if they think it’ll make them a buck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fantastic Four: nth Time's the Charm

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trslim@pawb.social 14 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Event Horizon but I feel that it would be a lot more in your face horror if they made it today.

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Excuse me? Event Horizon is perfect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] domin8r@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Please don't touch that movie. It is great as it is.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›