this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
387 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22087 readers
64 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskX@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, Reddit is a big dataset and yes, Reddit deserves to make some money off that if other organisations are going to scrape that data, for AI or anything else.

That's what they should be blocking and monetizing. Not those few users using 3rd party apps. Those folks (posters, mods) are amongst the ones creating that data set for Reddit, free of charge.

They are right about needing to make money to continue as a successful business. But they are doing it the wrong way and alienating their key assets.

Which is why I'm here :)

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they want organizations not to scrape their content, tough toenails; stopping them is impossible.

It's especially impossible to stop Google and Microsoft from doing it, because they already have a search index full of said content.

Spez is alienating his loyal user base for nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does reddit deserve to make profit from content made by others? They are service provider - they are not entitled to the work of people who used their service.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ok. I'm about to abandon an account that's 17.5 years old. I despise what reddit is proposing.

But, honestly, how do you propose they turn (some) profit so it could last forever? Losing money isn't a long-term recipe for success. I've got no problem with reddit seeking to profit. I've got a problem with their short notice and their refusal to let third party clients be part of the ecosystem they wish to create.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First I don't see why reddit has to be a for profit organisation in the first place, since that's kind of the rout of the problem. Users becoming a product that reddit is trying to sell to advertisers. At the same time if reddit would be respectful to users, creators and mods it would be a different story. But they are clearly not, they don't respect the people who are making reddit work - but feel entitled to the fruits of their labor. That just irks me on a deeply personal level.

My main problem is not even with the API decision but with the way the CEO communicated with the community.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

COMPLETELY agree that reddit shouldn't have developed in a commercial direction, but rather as a non-profit. That would avoided so many problems. That said, even as a non-profit losing money is not tenable.

I also agree that how the CEO communicated is a big part of the problem.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was never truly about them not making money though was it?

The whole thing would not have escalated, if they'd actually reacted to the problems raised, e.g. the astronomical API fees and the situation of mod tools and accessability tools.

Only when shit was already hitting the fan they responded to 3rd party devs, who tried to reach out to them for a month already.

Even if they'd postpone the changes and start listening to the raised problems now, they scorched a lot of earth and very well knew that would happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shufflerofrocks@beehaw.org 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Genuinely don't understand how reddit has failed to make money.

Reddit's entire value is based upon the unpaid contributions of its users- they generate and moderate all the content on the site for free, and these are the things that bring people to the site.

How entitled must one be to think they can ignore all this and be fine?

Also how tf is reddit not able to break bank?

The functionality of their website was relatively simple - not underming the reddit devs here. The costs must've been minimal before the redesign and the dumb ass decision to host their own images and videos. Did they burn up all their money for the redesign and the shitty app?

[–] JZshark@beehaw.org 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They’re bloated. Thousands of employees. Tons of developers. Marketing people. And in the end? The real product is like you said, it’s the users and volunteer mods.

Those developers? Produced an absolutely terrible mobile app and mobile website.

The marketing people? They’re more focused on NYC time square ads than fixing sponsored posts on Reddit.

It’s an absolute shitshow but that’s what happens with these extremely bloated companies…

[–] Cylinsier@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's amazing how much of this fallout could have been avoided if Reddit had just developed a competent mobile app at literally any point over THE LAST TEN YEARS. You had plenty of time Reddit. Posted from Jerboa, a mobile app which already works better for Lemmy than the official app for Reddit works for Reddit and was developed by one tankie in his spare time for peanuts.

And yes I know I am talking from a regular user perspective and not a moderator perspective and I can't speak to the mod capabilities of Jerboa, but I work in IT and have developed apps, it's not that hard to pay someone to make a decent one or just buy out an existing one and don't shit it up. The solution to this problem has been available for Reddit for literally years. Almost like if Huffman was a legitimate businessman instead of a tech bro who fell ass backwards into internet relevance, he would understand the concept of investing in the future rather than just doing nothing until a few months before IPO and then flinging shit directly into the fan in front of him.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AlienBlue was reportedly good before Reddit bought it, so I'd say the official mobile app is intentionally bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noob_dragon@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually sounds like a pretty standard case of feature creep, the bane of all large scale software. A vicious cycle of trying to do too much, failing, and then needing more people to maintain all of the crappy code. All the while they can't make any actual forward progress on things that do matter.

Not sure why they had to blow up like that. At its core Reddit should have been relatively simple to create and maintain.

It’s not “feature creep” when you prioritize ntf avatars over tools for moderators to keep the site functional.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spamfajitas@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't forget about https://nft.reddit.com/, the real moneymaker. Nothing says value-adding like nfts, the dumbfucks.

[–] darkmugglet@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

An NFT as your avatar? Wow, it's dumber than I thought.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superfes@beehaw.org 74 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I don't get it, if 3PA is only 1% of the traffic, why even bother murdering them?

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's possible that this is not about collecting money for third party app use, but instead about forcing people to use Reddit's apps (both mobile and web), which are designed for data extraction and tracking.

[–] Souvlaki@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, if they wanted money from 3rd party apps, they'd have sane prices. The ridiculous API cost was done to effectively kill all other apps without saying they are killing all other apps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madmaurice@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My best guess is they want to fight against adblockers next and can't have people easily switch to a 3PA and avoid ads this way.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ads already exist in Reddit's system as a different subtype of the same entity that a post or a comment is. They could just... Present adds in the API call returns. And they could have someone doing regular checks to ensure that the app developers aren't filtering out ads. This is so fucking stupid lol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] patchymoose@rammy.site 68 points 1 year ago (7 children)

“Reddit represents one of the largest data sets of just human beings talking about interesting things,” Huffman said. “We are not in the business of giving that away for free.”

Wow. Clearly Reddit now believes that they own all of the conversations that people have had on the site. That explains why they've also been restoring comments that people have deleted when leaving the site. That has major implications for data security, privacy, and even safety in some situations.

This episode has revealed Reddit's true colors, and they're not pretty.

[–] araquen@beehaw.org 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When something is free, you are the product. Reddit has been a human farm for ages, using effectively “slave” (free) labor to maintain the herd. That massive data trove is now being sold for profit. That’s why it’s so important that Huffman preserve Reddit and is kicking recalcitrant mods (something I predicted would happen).

I admit, I unsubscribed to Reddit and logged off the day of the AMA, after giving Huffman a piece of my mind about his “double dipping.” I was fine paying him for no ads. I would have been fine paying Apollo a small subscription. There was no way I was going to pay Reddit AND Apollo for the use of Reddit, when Apollo was basically going to be forced to collect the money I was already paying Reddit (using the APIs as a blinder).

I am fine leaving behind a ghost account. And while I get the idea of taking your data with you, frankly, I am not a thought leader in any space, and most of my comment history are stray tidbits across multiple subreddits. Certainly nothing of any value. The only value I have is being someone who could have eyes on to ads, or interact with an ad, and that can’t happen if I’m not there. And I fully believe that there is more harm to cause by being inactive than in not being there at all. Huffman may have 400 million accounts, but how many of those are actively engaged? What if the number of inactive accounts keep growing?

Let u/spez be CEO of a graveyard of rapidly aging data and ghosted accounts. For those who have contributed, I think the best solution at this time is to get your knowledge archived in a searchable format and then just pick up elsewhere. Yeah, there will be work to re-grow the community, but I have found that folks do migrate to where the activity is. As subreddits go quiet, folks will look for where the action is. It’s what happened with MySpace and Livejournal, LiveJournal and Facebook and Facebook and Twitter. Reddit is no different. Nor is Twitter. People just forget and get complacent. Personally, I like to shake things up anyway. It’s time for change.

[–] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I keep my account and deleted every single comment or post I've made. If you have ever follow any thread, seeing a [deleted] comment is infuriating even if it turns out to be insignificant info. I want to maximize my departure's effect and that's exactly what I wanted.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I have been having to rerun my deletion scripts daily. They are actively restoring comments. Even after writing gibberish and deleting. They are now holding more than 1 backup.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reric88@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Imagine if phone companies started selling our conversations without giving us a cent for the content.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, my sweet, summer child. Maybe not phone calls (yet?), but they sell lots of other data they maintain about you. Location data, specifically, is a hot seller.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What I find interesting is this could be avoided by granting exceptions to the existing app devs and being done with it.

I get the api costs money and theres folks like pushshift aggregating data and using it for their own profit. I’m sure plenty of companies are using data for adverts and more. And there’s an argument there Reddit deserves a cut. Especially if they are using the api to train bots or ai to have conversations for their own inventions.

But just the ass backwards way they handled devs of existing 3p apps that constitute value add to their data sets is just…mesmerizing.

And if these users ARENT a majority of the usage or costs, why bother cutting them off and not just granting exceptions to avoid the PR issues.

[–] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think you misunderstood spez. He wanted no 3rd party app at all. RIF was paying Reddit for using their brand name and spez terminated the contract. It's all about control.

It would be much easier to just inject ads into data returned by the API. Apps will automatically display these ads and developers will understand that if they filter these ads, their access to Reddit will be either limited or completely cut out.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Plus_a_Grain_of_Salt@beehaw.org 50 points 1 year ago (6 children)

"Huffman said in an interview that he plans to institute rules changes that would allow Reddit users to vote out moderators who have overseen the protest, comparing them to a “landed gentry.”"

I had to google Landed Gentry, it still don't make sense; "The landed gentry, or the gentry, is a largely historical British social class of landowners who could live entirely from rental income, or at least had a country estate." That's a weird way to describe an unpaid moderator. Either way, there's no reddit to return to if they're going scorched earth on the moderators anyways. This is home now.

[–] bspar@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I saw somewhere that the analogy was supposed to be "whoever got there first owned the land." The idea I guess is that the landed gentry settled down on the land (subreddits) first, and now the subreddit is a dictatorship because the users could never vote on who their "landlords" are.

Yes, that analogy is also terrible, and it also goes to show that spez has no idea why people hate landlords.

Edit: everyone that's replied to me has provided more reasons why it's a stupid analogy, and that makes me happy :)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] walkingears@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Amazing that he can't think of a way to make money that doesn't involve alienating the unpaid people who keep the place running.

I haven't abandoned Reddit entirely, but I'll never use the app...downloaded it once a year or two ago, and deleted it within an hour because it was ugly and confusing. I honestly think maybe the next phase of the protests, for those who still are active on Reddit, should be mass deletion of the app and using only the desktop site/mobile browser version. The API thing was meant to force people onto the app, so mass organizing to delete the app would hit them where it hurts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Imagine looking at what Elon is doing to Twitter and thinking "that's a great idea".

[–] Grimlo9ic@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Joke's on us, that's exactly what he thinks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, a moron continues being a moron. I’ve moved on. Would love to see the rest of the world move on, too, but it’s unlikely.

[–] PlasticExistence@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I deleted ~2300 comments and submissions.. Steve's not going to train AI off of my work while behaving the way he has. That entire company can go pound sand.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The craziest part is these people are volunteers and were the entire reason his stupid site worked to begin with. Why go to war with them? They can just walk away, they never got anything out of this to begin with. And why would anyone new join up if the previous generation is being treated this way? Just super mysterious behavior overall.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just another CEO who is out of touch with his product and his customers

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 38 points 1 year ago

Lol I love how brutal these headlines are getting

[–] Kuroneko@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This man just does not know when to shut up.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“Reddit represents one of the largest data sets of just human beings talking about interesting things,” Huffman said. “We are not in the business of giving that away for free.”

I mean holy shit dude. Do you listen to yourself? Where did that “data set of just human beings talking about interesting things” come from? It came from millions of people who gave you that content for free. And many of them used the site through third party apps because those apps made your site much more useful without charging you a dime.

The entitlement of Huffman is astounding.

He got free content and free app development work and now he’s going around whining about how “we’re not in the business of giving that away for free.”

Yikes.

🤣

also:

Huffman is engaging in the cardinal sin of the internet: trying to charge for something that has always been free. And acting as if he’s entitled to that money, and it’s the people who don’t want to pay who are the problem.

And, again, Huffman seems like all entitlement all the time:

“They need to pay for this. That is fair.”

I mean… the users of Reddit could just as easily turn around and say the same thing to Huffman for all the free labor, content, and data they’ve provided to him.

Reddit is dead

[–] StewieTheThird@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean genuinely if your charging for access to the content I have created then I am I entitled to a portion of your revenue. Same as Adsense on YT not that I want to turn it into a race to the bottom for engagement like those scenarios are conducive to. But if we want to make it about money we can make it about money /u/spez.

If I were an executive and If I was even 2% clued into the effect this is having on shifting the conversation to fediverse type projects I would be shitting myself. Not because this will have an immediately noticeable effect on my bottom line, but that it will continue to grow organically. We already crossed the threshold of momentum needed to self sustain, its all up from here especially as the tools and systems mature.

Just look at the tech literate around us start to question “yeah why the fuck are we leaving social media in the hands of corporations???”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ElysiumXII@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Deleted my Reddit account today, not gonna let Huffman use my content to make money and his attitude is very concerning tbh

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Sal@mander.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (8 children)

“Reddit represents one of the largest data sets of just human beings talking about interesting things,” Huffman said. “We are not in the business of giving that away for free.”

🤮

[–] Crayon8027@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Real Nestlé moment from Spez.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JiminyPicket@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They want to make money while turning reddit into another right wing shit hole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cstrrider1@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

To an extend I understand the lost ad revenue for the 3rd party apps. But it seems like there's a different solution, like requiring apps using the api to either pass through the ads or pay a per user fee, allowing for app users to get all the features they want for free and pay som small monthly subscription to remove the ads...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why isn't he paying users for their content?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›