734
I'd prefer a headline that reads convicted instead of charged.
By the end of June 2023, about 700 defendants had been found guilty (most by pleading guilty, the rest convicted at trial), and over 550 of them had been sentenced. Hundreds were still awaiting trial or sentencing.
Give it about two years
I wish this didn't feel so true
The DOJ conviction rate puts the numbers at nearly the same.
load more comments
(10 replies)
💀
Carefully coordinated is a stretch. It was haphazardly coordinated at best.
I'm sure the planning was done in a highly coordinated way. But project execution always comes down to your resources, and .. well .. the rioters aren't exactly the yummiest crayons in the box.
It's was as carefully planned as a bunch uninformed, violent, gullible traitors coulld get
I suppose we have to be thankful that collectively they couldn't outwit a potato. It's also fortunate for them as well because if they had actually succeeded in their objective they'd probably all been shot.
Eventually, but not right away I suspect.
Hey man, they did the best they could with the minds they had available.
Coordinated yes. Carefully? Questionable.
As carefully as trump supporters are able.
Insurrection.
load more comments
(7 replies)
"I ransacked the Capitol, and all I got was this striped shirt.”
Orange is the new black (and white striped shirt)
Just a bunch of enthusiastic tourists /s. GOP terrorists.
I'm always curious when I read a thread and see that one downvote over and over on sane comments that have many upvotes. If you're a conservative-leaning, elornmuskrat-apologist, conspiracy-minded type, why do you stick around here, on Lemmy, where you are clearly in the MEGA-minority, where peopler clearly dislike your views? Who are you, you dumb fuck?! Why are you here?
curious if your 1 downvote is for irony or not..
but back to the subject at hand... they get off on anger. it's addicting. they're addicted. if they leave, they won't get high.
They are desperate for the attention that being a contrarian invites, so of course they aren't leaving.
You can see who downvotes on kbin. Votes are public information in the Fediverse, Lemmy just chooses not to display it.
Maybe they're being downvoted because they're uninteresting comments that add nothing to the discussion?
Not that I am that downvote but do you think it is a good idea to create an echo chamber?
Personally I think it is a very bad idea and while I don't agree with many posts, I prefer alternate views more than a bunch of people telling me how right I am.
What client do you want that shows the upvotes and downvotes?
Desktop and Jerboa do.
Glad so many have been charged.
Seems low
That's great, but it's the former guy at the top that needs to be tried for treason. And they aren't quite doing it.
Lot of Felony Counts on his name right now. I don't particularly care if he goes down for Jaywalking as long as he's gone.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The number of people charged for their connection to the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the Capitol surpassed 1,100 earlier this week, the Justice Department (DOJ) announced.
The DOJ announced that as of Aug. 6, more than 1,106 defendants were charged in nearly all 50 states and Washington, D.C., for actions they took during insurrection.
The announcement noted that 372 people were charged with assaulting, resisting or impeding officers and employees, including 112 people who were charged with using a dangerous or deadly weapon or causing serious injury to an officer.
Eleven individuals were also arrested in connection with assaulting a member of the media or destroying their equipment.
The DOJ said that about 64 people were charged with destruction of government property, and 51 with stealing it.
More than 310 individuals were also charged with “corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so.” Forty-two defendants were charged with either conspiracy to disrupt a congressional proceeding, obstruction of law enforcement during a civil disorder or to injure an officer.
I'm a bot and I'm open source!
"Nearly all 50 states"
Good news, there's a number for that.
I kinda wanna know which states didn’t have any… and if that’s more of a “couldn’t get there” (Hawaii? Alaska?) or a “we just don’t have nutters” (I dunno where that would be.)
"A good start"
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
734 points (97.8% liked)
politics
31007 readers
2232 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS