Ava

The person you're responding to is pointing to a common corruption in politics, where politicians can receive money (read:bribes) and then shape their political messaging because of it, usually without much actual difficulty or official scrutiny. They're not saying that the exclusions are actually valuable to the general public.

Yeah, but that's only because everyone in Maine keeps getting killed by Stephen King monsters, and those are tracked as accidental deaths.

You could determine this pretty easily by uploading an unlisted video and then checking on an unrelated device that is blocking the domain.

For the curious, this is clearly an AI-tool and this cannot be trusted to report the factuality of anything.

Perhaps less relevant for you on Linux, but for any using Windows, WizTree is a hugely faster alternative to WinDirStat in case that's a pain point.

Also... who's gonna be attacking Canada with drones?

On the other hand, I suspect that some people with high-end PC specs might be more on the "privacy inclined" side of the spectrum, and might prefer not to share data on principle.

Though, if I were to guess, yours is probably the larger influence.

Well, there WAS that thing a couple of months ago where Kilmeade said the quiet part out loud, suggesting we should execute them.

Right, but the issue here is that nobody agrees on who is at fault. Nobody is given reason to change their minds, because it's "the other side" causing it, regardless of which side they're on. It's a problem that is definitely affecting real people, but "we're not the ones causing it" is an easy way to ignore responsibility.

That's not to say the shutdown should end, or that it isn't obvious that the administration isn't willing to come to the table, but I don't think I agree with your above point that there's anything undeniable to be found.

You're considering it from a partisan viewpoint. Future administrations would do better to add more robust protections against this form of political intervention. The DOJ should be independent, and welcome to investigate or charge any politicians they can make a case for, past or present, regardless of which colors are hanging in the ~~halls of the great leader~~ Trump Ballroom.

Nobody is seriously saying we should never prosecute a political opponent. They're saying that political opponents shouldn't be charged by partisan actors.

One of the wonders of being an adult is that our peers stop being limited to people who are the same age as us. Now in my late twenties, I have friends 10 years younger than me, and 20 years older.

Dating is different than friendship. But it's not so fundamentally different that I'd feel weird about dating an adult in those age brackets. Is it more likely I'm going to date someone closer to my age? Sure. On average, they'd be more likely to be in a point in their life that I'm looking for, but it's not a guarantee.

I'm a bit above your age bracket in question, so I'll comment on what advice I might give to a friend in that age bracket. Were a friend of mine to be thinking about getting involved with someone 20 years their senior, I'd tell her to think carefully. She should spend some time thinking about what she wants from a relationship. If she's still interested in going out late and drinking, or she likes raves, I might say she should consider whether her potential partner is still looking to have those things in their life. The opposite too, if she's the "comfy book and a movie at home" type of gal, is she wanting to be with this partner who's super into going out adventure biking all the time. I'd tell her to think carefully about why she's interested in this person, but also what this person sees in her.

On average, people gain some level of "maturity"/"wisdom"/life experience/je ne sais quoi about them as they get older. On average, people tend to date people who are similar to them in some ways. On average, partners will have similar levels of this vague term for aged distinction that I lack a term for. Relationships that don't follow this pattern are, then, unusual. Not bad or wrong, necessarily. My left ear is substantially asymmetrical from my right. That's unusual, but not a problem, except I have to be careful when finding earbuds that fit both ears properly. Similarly, those who date with large age gaps like this are unusual. Not inherently bad, but with some things to look for. It is more common that these sorts of relationships have some sort of unhealthy dynamic. Maybe that's a predatory power dynamic, or financial inequality, or just some skeevy 40 year old who thinks "coeds are hot sex toys, especially when they have daddy issues". Or, maybe they just both REALLY like boats. Like, they met when they both learned they were building a to-scale hand crafted replica of Viking longships, and it was a wonderful match for them. Or, maybe they both have a kink for plastering lizard scales on themselves, putting on goggles, sunning themselves on the patio, and then fucking like rabbits. The reasons they can find love for one another are many, and are not mine to limit, or to judge. I can judge them, mind you. If their relationship is based on how much they both love drowning puppies, they're awful people. But that's who they are, not who they love. That's different.

"Here's an Onion article" isn't a response to what I said. Most Americans also don't like the situation we're in. We agree with you on that point. But "I don't like this version of events and you people are disgusting for letting it happen" is a pointless observation when nobody has laid out an actual plan that could change things more than what's being done.

I ask again. What do you propose we should be doing instead?