I'm pretty sure it's a known strategy of a handful of billionaires (the richest man in PA comes to mind, though I forget his name) to back moderate dems to shift the board to the right.

I so deeply want Tesla to release automated vehicles with no drivers or observers in them. I'm sure that a company that has had it's dealerships get attacked will have no problem with cars on the road unaccompanied.

I've heard similar takes resolved with "this person is venomously sexist, but straight." Once their sexual needs are met, the one thing they want out of a partner is done, it's back to absolutely loathing women.

Sounds like a nightmare, tbh.

Land ownership, entrenched wealth. The economy already started to shift towards selling a few exceptionally expensive items to the rich over selling a ton of cheap items to the poor years ago, and we're going to see how far it can go into "if nobody has money who's going to buy everything" before a collapse. The examples I'm most familiar with are in video games. Gacha games target whales while, in the worst cases, using free players as content for those whales who are spending thousands or tens of thousands a month. Meanwhile, the price for individual releases keeps going up to the point that there's speculation that the coming console generation the switch 2 is heralding will be the first one that isn't affordable for the average american household.

The top 10% of US earners are already behind half of all consumer spending.

This is the correct take. As someone well endowed, I get to either be real real careful and avoid a lot of positions, or date exclusively masochistic girls who want it to hurt. As a result, I have had the thought "I'm not sadistic enough for this girl" during sex before.

Recently had a talk with hospital employee friend about ED and how it's exceptionally preventable and 9 times out of 10 caused by sedentary lifestyle resulting in poor circulation. Pass it on to bro, I guess.

What, you guys didn't have penis inspection day in gym class?

So, forest spirit seeks tribute and those paying tribute review it on their own, sure. Someone eventually brings this up while paying tribute, alright, I'm still with you. But "the spirit of the deep woods has a smart phone with a data plan and the means to keep it charged" is where I start to get real worried.

So jealous. So very, very jealous. "If a poor man steals, it is so he may eat. If a rich man steals, it feeds only his greed. Which, then, is the greater crime?" Should be a consideration in legal systems, on top of the whole "the rich do damage in the billions, the poor do damage in single digits" thing.

It is illegal in the EU. This was announced specifically for the US

Danger to pedestrians is why they're illegal in the EU, no?

It's hysterical how he compares the US to a department store, a kind of store that is all but dead in 2025.