Calirath

Averroes agrees but recognizes the vast majority of us simply lack the time, resources, and - primarily - capability to acquire the level of demonstrative proofs which grounds understanding hence the necessity of rhetoric and those brilliant enough to do to lead.

The most major change will be how quickly everything moves when Sanderson writes, he has a tempo well suited for the general audience while Jordon can meander - poorly at times.

This is unfortunate news and does not appear to be an isolated incident from their contractors as a cursory search reveals a similar story from their Hungary plant — I was actually looking forward for the second EV to be BYD (or Geely/another Chinese carmaker) once they arrive here and now I must double check every manufacturer.

Is it not ironic this most capitalist behaviour comes from a company in a country with a stated desire to become communist?

Education ≠ intelligence. To quote Berkeley, "Few men think; yet all will have opinions."

I thought it was adequate and my mini review primarily reflects my immense disappointment at its floundered potential to be more than its holistic experience, much like another movie I watched this year, 'Heretic.'

I'm not following how you came to this conclusion, but to give you the benefit of the doubt, I pulled up 'Superman' (2025) on both IMDb and RT as it's the one in most recent memory - and mine also. This is the result:

From my recollection, 'Superman' was serviceable fare and my personal rating is closest to IMDb's critics than any other. My first reaction upon seeing the large disparity between mine and RT's ratings (both) isn't that they're full of bots bombarding RT with perfect scores, but perhaps the people on RT simply has a preference to superhero movies.

I may very well be missing something as you seem more intimate with the working on both sites and would appreciate any insight you can provide.

I disagree as I find RT's "tomatometer" to be completely askew in reference to my personal rating while IMDb to be (more) aligned, in this way I find IMDb to be more "authentic."

Of course, this is coming from a simple watcher who does not gush at each Foley sound, sway at the perfect Dutch angle, groan at another sepia filter; one without aspirations to be yet another critic so my opinion is entirely just that.

It is good, definitely amongst the top 3 films released in 2025 that I've seen (of which amounts to 30 as of this comment).

Initially the intention to reply was vacant until I noticed your username so I'm sure you can (and will) apply most of the themes in 'The Present Age' to Hallmark movies and their audiences, notably sans reflection. Although, I can't properly remember if I have ever watched a Hallmark movie in full, perhaps my preconceived assumptions will be proven false.

I also watched 'De-Lovely' a few weeks ago and "meh" summarizes it perfectly.

'The Battle of Lake Changjin' is based on the eponymous events where the US - under MacArthur - occupies the role of the aggressor nation. The movie itself wasn't noteworthy as it's equivalent to standard Hollywood mediocrity, however my confused mind railed against accepting that the US can be anything other than the protagonist and so served to expand my limited worldview as my media consumption was admittedly US-centric.