[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 21 points 2 months ago

Got any more pixels?

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 4 months ago

Better yet, keep it boiling and save the heat as well.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 21 points 7 months ago

$200 + KFC, don't be greedy.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago

Somehow, I dont think that'll matter to much in a Taliban university. May as well just go back to "earth, water, air and fire".

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago

Depends on entirely on local laws. My house has an interesting quirk written into the title where I cannot dig up clay in order to make bricks. No idea how that's enforced, but its there.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Vigilantism is bad because of the slippery slope issue. It starts with solid proof, and then slowly declines towards "vibes", or fabrication of proof.

"Beyond reasonable doubt" is the high bar set by the legal system, and they have the processes in place to ensure that the bar is met before declaring guilt (its not perfect, but it is so far the best system we have).

If the proof is solid, and the law enforcement is functional, its better to hand it to them and let the system do its job. If the law enforcement isnt functional, vigilantism is all that is left, but you should strive to meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" bar. E.g is the evidence good, do you have the right person, could someone else be framing/manipulating the facts.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I thought that was the case tbh, has it changed?

Edit: is-even depends on is-odd.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Imagine Full Self Driving powered by ChatGPT. "There is definitely a road here, and I am turning onto it. That was not a bicycle" :D

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Would be interesting to tally up the negative impacts of removing humans as well.

Culls of invasive species would no longer occur, which would be detrimental in those ecosystems.

A fairly significant number of endangered animals probably only exist today due to human intervention and breeding programs (i am well aware that we probably made them endangered in the first place)

Cross breeds would be done as well, Ligers and Mules require humans for breeding. Although in fairness they are definitely not natural to begin with.

Many animals we have domesticated would be done for as well, most smaller dogs are completely, reliant on humans for food and grooming. Many cats would be okay, but some breeds are likely dead ends as well. Jersey cows would probably have a bad time as well, without milking, sheep might have issues as well?

Interesting thought experiment.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The generic answer is usually that someone hasn't felt the need to create and release one.

Open source basically means you get whatever someone else felt like creating, and they'll usually create it to suit themselves first and foremost (which may mean having a poor user interface, or certain limitations or performance quirks).

~~BlueStacks is cross platform, but I have never used it so no idea what the performance is gonna be like.~~

view more: ‹ prev next ›

CameronDev

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF