On a Boeing, they're zip ties holding them together
// this is bollocks, delete it
That's almost certainly from a Brit.
// this looks like I'm being a fancy arsehole, but this is all because // the window shows up white for some reason when first opened, and this // disguises it.
Could be either.

chefkiss.png
Google's AI seems dumber than the rest, for example here's Kagi answering the same (using Claude):

edit: typoed question originally
Perhaps Google's tried to make it run too cheaply - Kagi's one doesn't run unless you ask for it, and as a paid product it'll have different priorities.
Patrick Delaney's salute:

I know News Corp are evil, but this pic looks more mocking than heartfelt.
I felt the same when reading that book, and I never finished it because following the rules he suggested produced horrible code.
If memory serves, he also suggested that the ideal if statement only had one line inside, and you should move multiple lines into a function to achieve this.
I once had to work on a codebase that seemed like it had followed his style, and it was an awful experience. There were hundreds of tiny functions (most only used once) and even with an IDE it was a chore to follow the logic. Best case the compiler removed most of this "clean" code and the runtime wasn't spending most of its time managing the stack like a developer had to do.
I love fungi facts.
It's a weird time to be alive.
Some frequently cited statistics—that cases of wrongly assigned paternity make up between ten and thirty per cent of all births—are misleading, since they are often based on data from tests requested by people who already have doubts about paternity. When the data are based on studies done for other reasons (for example, to look at inherited predispositions to conditions like cystic fibrosis), the rates of misattributed paternity come in at between one and 3.7 per cent.
That answered my question, quoted in case it answers others', too.
I think of a lurker as someone who doesn't post - I guess your definition is someone who doesn't interact at all (besides making an account and subscribing, I assume). But yes, I mean users who only vote are now counted (it's not using views afaik).
“Quest was originally designed as a demonstration project to prove (carbon capture) technology and overall has met or exceeded our expectations,” said Shell
So they knew it wouldn't work, but they got the government to subsidise it at least.
So Tesla gets that $56 billion back? Kinda funny that that causes their share price to drop.
Deebster
0 post score0 comment score
Is that meant to say reviewing? Either way, I can't see how this would lead to good results, even with a comprehensive test suite. Security? Scalability? Maintainability?