this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
421 points (93.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
96 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably should've just asked Wolfram Alpha

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It is correct. Half is 3/6 a third is 2/6. So a half is one third larger than 1/3

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

You dropped this: /s

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 155 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not even moderately helpful for printer questions.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 74 points 1 week ago

What, your printer doesn't have a full keyboard under its battery? You've gotta get with the times my man.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It sounds like some weird ritual that someone scratched into a notebook.

𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿?? under battery, m͟u͟s͟t͟ f͟i͟n͟d͟ k͟e͟y͟s͟

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 9 points 1 week ago

Most desk side support is exactly that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wilmo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

80 year old grandmas trying to find the Ctrl and Alt buttons on her printer...

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Did she look under the battery?

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Google's AI seems dumber than the rest, for example here's Kagi answering the same (using Claude):


edit: typoed question originally

Perhaps Google's tried to make it run too cheaply - Kagi's one doesn't run unless you ask for it, and as a paid product it'll have different priorities.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

this is why i like the DDG approach: don't have the LLM try to reason, just have it pull information from sources you've checked aren't completely insane, and summarize an answer from there.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There are two meanings being conflated here.

"1/3 more" can mean "+ 1/3" or "* (1 + 1/3)“.

So "1/3 more than 1/3" could be 2/3 or 4/9, but not 1/2.

Instead 1/2 is 1/2 more than 1/3, not 1/3 more. That's the meme I've seen go around recently.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

~~Yes, and the Google AI response is correct (and quite clear) in what it says.~~ edit: Thanks Batman. I mean that Google's understanding of the question is logical (although still the maths is wrong as you say (now I've re-read you)) and its answer explained the angle it was answering from.

However, I think the reasonable assumption for the intention behind the question is relative to a whole. I had third of a pizza, and now I have an extra sixth of a pizza. It's subtle, but that's the kind of thing AI falls down on.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I agree with your assessment regarding the intention of the phrase. We're back at the silly arithmetic meme that hinges on not grouping terms explicitly and watching people yell at each other in the mistaken belief that there's one authoritative interpretation of an ambiguous string of symbols.

Still, the actual mistake remains. Why an extra 1/6 of the pizza? 1/3 of 1/3 is 1/9, not 1/6. That's 1/2 of 1/3.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought we were finally agreeing fully! My understanding of the question is "what is the difference between a third (of a pizza, say) and a half?"

1/2 - 1/3 = 1/6
1/2 = 1/3 + 1/6
a half is one sixth more than a third.

btw, I fixed my Kagi screenshot since I'd missed a word from the question (reading comprehension's clearly not my strong point today)

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Aha, yes. Somehow I forgot the difference interpretation for a moment. Oops!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Kagi has Claude built in? I've been using it for a year and didn't know that.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

It tries to auto-determine when to trigger, but you can explicitly trigger it by putting a question mark after your query.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

one third plus one half of one third is one half.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Sure, but, what does that have to do with the AI answer? Wait.. Are you an AI?

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think thats an issue with AI, it has been so much trained on complex questions that now when you ask a simple one, it mistakes it for a complex one and answers it that way

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

The issue is it's an LLM. It puts words in an order that's statistically plausible but has no reasoning power.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's auto-complete. It knows that "4" is the most common substring to follow "2 + 2" in its training. It's not actually doing addition.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now ask it if a Third-of-a-Pound burger is bigger than a Quarter Pounder

[–] quant@leminal.space 5 points 1 week ago

Did Google train Gemini on American dataset?

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically the one thing computers are normally good at.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

(1/3) +(1/2)(1/3) = 1/2

Math checks out from this end.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"a half is one-third more than a third" should mean either

1/3 + 1/3 = 1/2

Or

1/3 + (1/3 × 1/3) = 1/2

Neither of which is true.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like 'a half is one-third more than a third' is ambiguous and same as in 'X is N% more than Y' one may use X or Y as 100%

I'm sure that one interpretation is more common, but I don't think that it is exclusively correct

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

1/3 more than 1/3 is 4/9. What you wrote is 1/2 more than 1/3, not 1/3 more of it.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is very clearly an example of bad AI, but maybe it was trying (and failing) to convey this?

Basically, 1/3 + 1/9 + 1/27 + 1/81 + ... + 1/3^n = 1/2.

Probably not. But maybe.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m thinking it’s trying to say:

(2/6) + (1/6) = (3/6) = (4/6) - (1/6)

But either in “colloquial English for those who want to give other people aneurysms” or “colloquial English for those trying to sound smarter but aren’t”

Basically that the degree of difference between a half and a third is the same degree of difference between a half and two thirds- and that degree of difference is “one part”.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not trying to say either of them.

It's just guessing what word to say next, given the previous words in the context.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Definitely true, of course,

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Or ⅓ + (⅓*½) = ½

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 4 points 1 week ago

1/3 is 1/2 of 2/3

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LLMs are really fucking bad at math. They're trying to find the statistical close answer, not doing computation. It's rather mind-numbingly dumb.

[–] kahnclusions@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately a shockingly large number of people don’t get this… including my old boss who was running an AI-based startup 💀

[–] deadbeef79000 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"42"

"The answer to life the universe and everything is 42!?"

"Yes, I checked it quite thoroughly."

...

"But what was the actual question?"


Alternatively, garbage in, garbage out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe the intent is to make people even dumber. It’s just misinformation all the way down.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't even be surprised at this point. It seems the system is intentionally designed to discourage critical thinking and apparently knowing how to do math properly is too close for comfort now.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Someone I know had an old friend on their Facebook timeline say that schools should be reformed and don’t need classes like algebra. Then they proceeded to list fields kids could receive training for instead… and all of them required math of some sort.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh. I just noticed the extraneous word in the search, which might be throwing off the LLM trying to understand it.

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I asked ChatGPT these questions and got sensible answers.

How much more is one half than one third?

[subtraction answer: 1/6 more]

That's one possibility, but what about the other way to interpret that question?

[ratio answer, but expressed as "1.5 times as much" rather than "1/2 more"]

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I read it as “A third of a third plus a third is a half.” Which makes sense to me. What an I missing?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's wrong. 1/3 + (1/3 * 1/3) = 3/9 + 1/9 = 4/9. It's close though.

However, one third plus one half of a third is correct. 1/3 + (1/2 * 1/3) = 1/3 + (1.5/3 * 1/3) = 1/3 + 0.5/3 = 1.5/3 = 1/2

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›