IMO micro plastics is the latest socieital “Boogie man”.

Yeah just like global warming right?

The main thing is that group by gives you a smaller number of rows than the input, collapsing the data from individual rows into the group rows in the output, while a window function does not change the number of rows - it just allows you to use data from other rows for calculations in each output row

Society doesn't have to work that way.

That is such a gross oversimplification it is ridiculous. It works with the assumptions that

1. people can pick whoever they want
2. Politicians don't lie about what they'll actually do
3. There isn't all kinds of financial fuckery involved that corrupts the whole system

I'm sorry to say that overwhelming government corruption is happening the world over.

Have security vulnerabilities

Kate, my beloved

I'm not the one who told you to flip burgers, but making an appeal to authority where the authority is yourself and you've already repeatedly said things that destroy your credibility is a new level of pathetic.

Your point? Climate change has the potential to affect every living thing on the planet. Even the horrors of world war 2 didn't have that kind of reach. Additionally, humans eventually have to stop fighting when enough of them are dead. Climate change is a threat that humanity can unleash but be potentially unable to stop. Like I said, a different kind of beast.

If what you mean is unpaid internships, they're great ways to perpetuate elitism because they select for people with rich parents.

You either haven't watched or are making up headcanon to justify your opinion.

You know damn well they were referring to nationality rather than race.

The way that rust attempts to prevent this class of error is not by making an implementation of free that is safe to call twice, but by making the compiler refuse to compile programs where free could be called twice on a pointer.

Anyway, use after free doesn't depend on a double free. It just means that the program frees memory but keeps the pointer (which now points at memory that could contain unrelated data at some future point in time) and if someone trying to exploit the program finds a way to induce the program to read or write to that memory they may be able to access data they are not expected to, or write data to be used by a different part of the program that they shouldn't be able to