[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

Almost all the changes are to ensure it still builds. This is purely a preservation effort.

That said, the move to make it compatible with systemd is interesting. Did not see that coming.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago

Because CEOs in general lean pretty right?

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

It is lots of modules but not really that modular. There is little concern about working with anything else.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

I was very excited for COSMIC but I have kind of moved on the Niri now. I am not sure it will lure me back.

That said, I have been using COSMIC Term and COSMIC Panel with Niri. So they still have their hooks in me.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Get a cheap desktop and run Windows on it. Remote Desktop into that machine to run your app.

You can use TwinGate or Tailscale to access your desktop from anywhere.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

As good as this comment is, neither has the range or targeting capability that the US does or that the USSR did.

The security council veto was designed to keep the US and the USSR at the negotiating table and off the battlefield.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

All Canadian pipelines need to go east / west now and terminate at a Canadian coast.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most compatible is FAT32 which is also the most limited.

I am not sure I would trust the WinBtrfs driver with anything important. What problems are you having with NTFS?

Linux has two NTFS stacks: NTFS-3G and NTFS3 ( in the Linux kernel since 5.15 ). NTFS3 is faster and more feature rich I think but that said it also lacks a few things. NTFS-3G is more mature and some people still report it to be more stable.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

There is some good stuff in there

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

1 in 2 professional developers use Linux ( many of the others probably use Macs ).

If you are working with containers ( the cloud ), Linux is the native environment. So Linux provides a great environment for most of what is headed for AWS or Azure. If you are building websites ( eg. React ), Linux is the nicest environment to work in. Node is best on Linux. Java and Python IDEs work great on Linux. C / C++ work is often embedded with is often Linux and again the tooling works great on Linux. The more offbeat your platform choice, the more likely it is to be Linux first ( Gleam anyone? ). Even the .NET experience is great on Linux ( maybe better than Windows depending on what you are building ).

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good for you? I guess.

I do not really like them either but I am not sure what point you are making. Their point is that these images result in more viewers, even accounting for your absence. What are we meant to do with the information that you are out?

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

I would certainly benefit if more hardware supported Linux out-of-the-box.

Many people will benefit if that one key application they need is supported on Linux.

We all benefit from the paid developers working on Linux. The number of such people are linked to the profitability of Linux for companies which is a function of popularity.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

LeFantome

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago