NimdaQA

joined 20 hours ago
[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 0 points 5 minutes ago

Perhaps he is attempting to appeal to his ex wife whom ditched him for Donald Trump Jr.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 0 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Gavin Newsom also set his own state on fire, literally.

Gavin Newsom also had an affair with his own campaign manager‘s wife resulting in said campaign manager resigning from his position.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Who would have thought?

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Not really a false flag but I still place some blame on Zelenskyy.

Foreign mercenaries and instructors from NATO countries are often accommodated in hotels. In Krivoy Rog hotel facilities were being turned into deployment sites for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Last year, SBU actually arrested a man and said man was sentenced for 8 years because he stated that there were a lot of military personnel in the hotels of Kharkiv which was confirmed.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -1 points 39 minutes ago
[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Atleast it ain’t bad as X, first thing you see is Holocaust denialism, yikes.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Ukraine followed the agreement and disarmed itself, Russia did not and actually armed up, you skipped that part…

Nothing in the Budapest Memorandum forced Russia to disarm itself.

Russia was also forbidden to continue military actions and they did anyway. (This included the illegal occupation of Crimea, followed by a falsified gun-point referendum. By doing this, Russia completely disregarded its obligations to respect Ukrainian borders and independence).

Such actions were undertaken after US sanctioned Belarus in 2013 in violation of the agreement thus it was already by that point, null and void in its entirety.

It depends? One can argue? Do you want to commit here or just dance around the point

If you want my opinion, the 2014 coup made all previous agreements null and void. I mean the coup happened because snipers part of the maidan movement shot their own protestors as a false flag resulting in Yanukovych's regime's downfall.

The spirit of the agreement? What the fuck are you talking about… They broke the agreement thousands of times.

According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense....

Nonetheless, no Russian actions ever broken the spirit of the agreement. Minsk II was supposed to bring peace to Ukraine by providing more autonomy to regions with large ethnic minority populations, ceasefire violations committed by both sides does not violate the spirit of the agreement.

The entire agreement was Ukraine allows local elections, Russia withdraws then everyone’s happy. Russia can’t do its part if Ukraine doesn’t.

Fuck you, fuck off and fuck Russia.

Again, rude.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Are they? Ukraine had many years to implement the Minsk agreement, Instead, Ukraine proceeded to implement new language laws which discriminated against the Russian language (going against the agreement), continued to imprison and torture political dissidents after the agreement was made as per Amnesty International which was also in violation of the Minsk Agreement which explicity stated that Ukraine was not allowed to imprison or punish people due to events related to the war in Donbas. Ukraine also refused to allow local elections.

"Ukraine insists that local elections can take place only after a complete ceasefire and withdrawal of all Russian troops and weapons.

Clear violation of spirit of agreement as such Russian forces were necessary for protecting the autonomy of the people in the Donbas until Minsk implementation.

The entire agreement was Ukraine allows local elections, Russia withdraws then everyone’s happy. Russia can’t do its part if Ukraine doesn’t

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Migrated here from Reddit. Also spouting anti-Trump statements.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago

It was not “explicitly prohibited” by the agreement. Stop spreading misinformation. This is a quick read to find out how obviously wrong you are.

Yes it was,

"Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind."

Try again.

Meanwhile, “One can argue that Russian actions (passive language) on 2014” for something that was EXPLICITLY forbidden.

It depends if you consider it null and void due to 2014 coup. If you don't, it was in violation of that agreement.

view more: next ›