Onomatopoeia

joined 1 week ago
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 10 points 8 hours ago

Oh, wow.

Looks like some of it was filmed in a back yard, some at a RenFest site. Lol, gotta love it!

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 21 hours ago

I've worked for very large organizations (30k+ employees) that didn't use crappy paper.

All depends on the company.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 22 hours ago

(In Sydney's voice) "are you sure, or is that just what you want to see?"

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ooh, good Ole malicious compliance.

Make it a check.

Even better, pay with visa. The processing fee will be more than 23¢

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

You mean probably the most popular pics of her?

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

Those gals are probably 60 today

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 day ago

That was an extra, I wouldn't worry about it.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So I know whether to waste my time

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sadly I think we'll have to take the water to them.

My current approach is building a media center for me, as a model for one I'll send to my siblings/friends.

Besides being a media center, it'll enable replication between them, with some backup services for laptops and phones. And some replacements for things like facebook/photo sharing, etc (and have a chat mechanism, most likely via XMPP).

And...it'll have something like PiHole that I'll manage centrally.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 91 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

"Devitio"

I expect no less from AI garbage, haha

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago

"raw dogging the Internet"... I chuckled out loud

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One day, after I am done with -insert reason here-, I will have a bad ass, well thought out backup solution.

For some reason you're "insert reason here" was dropped by lemmy. I guess a sequential less-than/greater-than messes with it.

1
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe to c/guns@lemmy.world
 

Totally off the wall question, which I realize probably isn't very meaningful, but I was watching a movie where a character was using a suppressed rifle. Looked like an AR/.223 (I assume).

Well it got me thinking - how much can a given gun be suppressed (decibel reduction) before performance is significantly reduced (I assume it must impact performance, even if just a little since it's attenuating sound waves, which are energy, but what do I know?).

I'm sure it varies by round/load, barrel length, etc, so let's assume a subsonic .223 round in a 14" barrel (is that a common lenth?). Or if you know a specific case that's fine too.

Surely there are reasons why a given suppressor is chosen for a specific use case, and I don't know enough to see that (diminishing returns for length/weight?)

I tried asking chatgpt, but it just returned generic suppressor info.

view more: next ›