Quicky

joined 1 year ago
[–] Quicky@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, I literally said it was Bungie making terrible management decisions.

But there’s no way Halo would have had the same impact on Mac as it did on Xbox. The Microsoft purchase was win-win. Leaving Microsoft let them pursue other IP and give greater creative control, but they also never reached those heights they did under Microsoft either before or after their stewardship.

Edit: don’t get me wrong, clearly recent Microsoft game studio acquisitions have been a bad thing for the industry, but I just don’t think the Bungie example is a good one. I think it’s rewriting history a bit to say that Bungie may have suffered under Microsoft.

This is a company that became industry rockstars with an incredibly successful franchise and were given an inordinate amount of money and support at the time. Them believing they’d be better off on their own was partly a fallacy, and only really resulted in going full circle and letting Sony purchase them.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They became wildly successful under Microsoft. As far as I remember, it was Bungie who were the driver behind leaving Microsoft because they wanted to move on to other IP, as opposed to being “The Halo company”.

I can’t blame them for that, but it’s not Microsoft’s fault that what they did afterwards was a shadow of their former glory.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I reckon that’s less about Microsoft and more about Bungie though. Bungie are primarily responsible for their own downfall with some terrible management decisions.

Microsoft were very good to Bungie from the beginning in terms of finance and support, and Halo on Mac would never have had the same impact as Halo on Xbox.

It’s been nearly 20 years since Bungie left Microsoft. In this case, I think it’s unfair to blame Microsoft for what they’ve since become.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is Portugal’s year (the fix has been in for a long time)

Is it now.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Escape from Butcher Bay was an absolutely superb game. On the OG Xbox, it was astounding how good it looked.

I remember it being, at the time at least, a great example of a video game that’s better than the film(s) from the same universe.

And to be fair, I loved Pitch Black when I saw it in the cinema. Chronicles was a let down for me. The “universe” didn’t need to be expanded in the way that it did, as I thought the character works much better in a compact, tight, structured environment. Something which I guess they realised for Riddick, where they went back to his roots with what I thought was another great film.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 18 points 3 weeks ago

It would probably be easier to answer the intent behind the question, if the question itself wasn’t embellished with wild exaggeration.

 

Fully expect this to just be me, but the way the tall, angular Beorma Tower looms over the curved rear of the Selfridges building is architecturally erotic.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago

I’ve played every mainline GTA game since the first one came out in 97 when I was at university.

I was just looking at the release schedule of the mainline games, and the 3D entries roughly doubled their development time over the years (nearly tripled with the gap between V and VI).

If that trend continues, there’s a good chance that VI could be the last GTA game I get to play before I die of old age.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Toadally weird

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean?

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perfect accompaniment the workplace chat up line:

“If you like my spreadsheets you should see my bedsheets”

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

This looks almost exactly like an Alfa Romeo SZ

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Currently I’d recommend Vernissage over Pixelfed. The former is actively developed while the latter is stagnant.

I’ve been a Pixelfed user for a few years, but I’m in the process of migrating to Vernissage after seeing how responsive and attractive it is as a platform.

 

I've been a PixelFed user for a few years now after having binned off Instagram a long time ago, but I've always kept an eye on Vernissage's development. Pixelfed has had very little in the way of updates in several months despite having the far larger user base, whereas Vernissage has been steadily releasing updates for its comparatively tiny set of users, and not long ago released an iOS app which I thought I'd try out, which turned out to be superb - it's so much better looking and performant than the official Pixelfed app. The downside for most (I imagine) would be the lack of an Android app.

Whereas Pixelfed is geared towards being an Instagram replacement, Vernissage seems to be tailored more to the Flickr/500px proper-photographer type crowd. While I was in the market for an Instagram replacement, Vernissage is the platform I've found myself increasingly using simply because of how well presented it is.

I was wondering if anyone else who is interested in photo sharing has tried both, and what their opinions are of them. There's tons of chatter on Mastodon around Pixelfed, but a lot less about Vernissage.

Links to the main instances:

https://pixelfed.social/
https://vernissage.photos/

 

Pretty old apple tree in the garden which produces hundreds of not-great-tasting apples every year looks like it’s in a bit of a state. I had to cut back a weird branch that had been cut before, presumably because it shot out horizontally, and there’s a ton of rot.

It’s not in danger of hitting any buildings if it ever does fall, although could maybe take out a distracted child or two if I’m lucky.

Is there anything I can do to save it?

 

I’ve often heard that the reason Windows has suffered from bloat and so much has been built on top of ancient underlying technologies, partially to ensure compatibility with old software.

If something like Windows 11 requires specific hardware in order to install it, why does it need to accommodate compatibility for archaic devices/software?

Would it not be preferable for Microsoft to start from scratch with an OS that is considerably more efficient and cut-down for newer devices, similar to something like Apple’s MacOS transition from Intel to Apple Silicon, and just provide security updates for the legacy operating systems that would be in use on un-upgradable hardware?

 

I have a Logitech K860 keyboard that I use with a work Windows laptop and a personal M4 MacBook Air, both via bluetooth. I'm constantly switching between the two devices during the day, and the bluetooth switching buttons are great for that. Switching to the Windows machine is instant, but when switching to the MacBook there's always a 2 or 3 second delay before it connects. Is there anything I can do to improve the device switching speed to the Mac?

 

It snapped and wound itself back inside the mechanism inaccessibly, and I became the freak wandering round with a belt attached to his dog, trying to make it home before his trousers fell down.

43
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Quicky@piefed.social to c/dull_mens_club@lemmy.world
 

I have a 2014 Volkswagen Touran. The Touran isn’t even a particularly big vehicle - it’s built on the same chassis as a Golf. On a long solo drive today, it occurred to me that the car has a ludicrous amount of cup holders.

I have the 7 seat variant, with two fold-down seats in the boot. There are 15 cup holders in total:

2 in the glovebox lid. 

1 in the driver’s door. 

1 in the passenger door. 

3 in the centre console at the front. 

2 flip-out ones in the centre console at the rear. 

1 in the rear passenger side door. 

1 in the rear driver’s side door. 

1 in the rear passenger side tray table. 

1 in the rear driver’s side tray table. 

2 above the rear wheels for the boot passengers. 

Bearing in mind the only cup holders accessible to the two rear-most passengers are the ones above the rear wheels, there are 13 cup holders for the 5 other passengers. I’m not sure what to think about this .

13
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Quicky@piefed.social to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
 

Props to this small indie developer who’s worked tirelessly to launch this relatively unknown app promptly on Apple Watch

 

We’ve been an Xbox household forever, but recently I stopped paying for Game Pass due to the price increases. Last night my daughter was complaining that there was “nothing to play”.

There are 416 owned games available for download on that Series X which have been accumulated over the years through purchases or Xbox Live Gold or whatever, and she’s barely scratched the surface of them.

For the total life of my PS1 ownership when I was her age, I owned 5 games.

“In my day…”, etc etc

 

Took this photo this morning while having breakfast at the Lake Vyrnwy Hotel in Powys, Wales, which has incredible views of the lake.

view more: next ›